Oracle has spent tens of billions of dollars buying companies that give it a diverse, rich product portfolio. Such industry consolidation also, not coincidentally, has granted Oracle significant pricing power and a ready-made bevy of customers to which it can cross-sell its products.
I wonder, however, if this is the best way for Oracle to be attracting new customers in a slow-growth enterprise software market.
I've suggested before that. No, it currently doesn't generate Oracle-worthy billions in profits, but it wouldn't need to for Oracle to make good use of it.
In MySQL,and, as such, it also acquired an excellent on-ramp to a wide array of proprietary Oracle technology, including its flagship database. Open-source purists might not like such a strategy, but it is the before it was acquired by Sun, and which it continued to espouse post-acquisition.
Let's just say that Oracle is likely to get more bang for its proprietary buck than either MySQL or Sun could achieve.
Oracle, of course, isn't alone in standing to reap benefits from open-source "on-ramps" to its proprietary products. its Windows client business loses pace within the company and it seeks ways to spruce up adoption., and to great effect. I think we'll see Microsoft adopting this approach for some of its products soon enough, too, especially as
An open client that feeds into closed cloud offerings seems like a great strategy, and it's one that Microsoft is already mimicking with its SharePoint product.
Yes, these companies could spend billions acquiring competitors and complementary product lines so as to achieve economies of scale and sale, but they could also discover the ease of distribution that open source offers. It's a lot cheaper and could prove equally or more effective.
Follow me on Twitter @mjasay.