CEO is wrong to play politics with Google's brand
Eric Schmidt, whose personal brand is tied up in Google, should have left his corporate logo behind when stumping for presidential candidate Barack Obama.
Google CEO Eric Schmidt has officially thrown his weight behind Barack Obama in the U.S. presidential race. I find it a bit unseemly and unfair to the employees at Google, even though many probably support Obama.
I felt the same about then on her way out of the eBay CEO chair at the time., though at least she was
Google, as a company, has done well to take, inviting both the Republican and Democratic candidates to speak at the Google campus, and providing technology infrastructure at the nominating conventions for both parties.
But Schmidt, as CEO, has done something different. His personal brand is tied up in Google. Just as McCain misused Whitman's name in the second presidential candidate debate, so, too, will Obama (or the media, as it already has) use Schmidt's Google credentials to imply that Google, the company, favors Obama's presidential aspirations. Google employees, meanwhile, have no say in the matter. This is somewhat dubious, even where unions are concerned, but it has no place in a corporation.
It would be different if this were Schmidt espousing a particular political cause that has direct financial ramifications for Google,, but this is not the case, and it's unfair to his employees to tie up the Google brand in any political party, because a political party's platform includes all sorts of issues that have no place in the message of a technology company.
The same holds true for churches and nonprofits. People can have a political opinion on a candidate. Apolitical organizations should not.
Let Schmidt commit his cash to Obama, but he shouldn't be committing the Google brand to either political candidate. This is what he does when he officially endorses Obama.