After much fretting over prices, we can now wrap up our 3D card coverage, at least for now, as we post reviews of the
Prices became a concern for us in this roundup, as our target was initially $300 and less. The GTX 260 fits the bill, but the 2GB Radeon HD 4850 X2 we received from AMD didn't at first, hovering around $340. We thought about aiming lower, but the distance between $250 anddidn't feel wide enough.
We asked for the 1GB version of the 4850 X2, but by the time we received it it seemed to have disappeared from retail availability. Fortuitously, as the 1GB version disappeared, the price on the 2GB model also came down to $299 at Amazon, and for a day at NewEgg, where it's currently about $319.
For Nvidia's part, the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 started at $299 when we first acquired the product, and then dropped to about $260 by the time we finished, about a month and a half later (holidays, CES, etc.). We also saw that the GeForce GTX 280 started to hover around $320 or so. Thus, our spread here of $260 to $320, between three different cards.
You'll notice we don't include the $240 1GB Radeon HD 4870, nor do we have scores for the $375 Geforce GTX 285. We wanted to stick to the middle ground between the $150 low end and the. Deviate too far and the lines between categories get blurry.
It's frustrating for review purposes, but it's also extremely confusing when you go to make a purchase. Until you hit the very high end, someone can always suggest that you spend just a little bit more for the next card up. We tried to pick the sweet spots around certain price points. If AMD and Nvidia's incessant thin slicing of the market falls victim to our decisiveness, so be it.
So. Our review of the Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 X2 is
Of the three, the Radeon card gets the nod, not least for its performance, but also because it's the only card with four DVI ports, enabling the pictures in our slide show below. The GTX 260 Core 216 also has some promise, as it was the most power efficient of the bunch. Enjoy.