12 total posts
McAfee did that too.
Not much new here. The issue of the firewall module still functioning after you turn it off is well, a very old issue.
Please. I don't have the explanation and I don't know what's at Area 51 or 52 either.
All I know is I dumped both.
A very old issue?
A very old issue?
Security experts and public don't care? A security application that runs some shady code - that sounds alarming ...
It was well explained ...
in the thread you linked to. VSMON is a part of the APPLICATION and monitors all internet connections so even if you have the firewall shut down it will continue monitoring as you likely have email, and various application updates running.
It is just how it works, NOTHING broken or buggy, just how Zone Labs chose to implement their app.
Some people don't like that and change while others like ZA and find work-a-rounds such as this one by Dianetix (Programmer) at this link - http://www.tek-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=960579
This explanation covers cause and cure and was offered you in the ZA forum:
Running applications that keep a constant internet connection open will create extra cycles to be used for ZA. Your basically constantly pushing data through ZA that it has to analyze so there will be more resources used and 50% and more is not unusual with these types of applications.
Its always been this way with ZA its just how the ZA core technology works and it nothing that can be changed or fixed because its working as designed.
Best advise don't run these kinds of apps all the time.
And while some don't like it.
I've seen this area like this for over a decade.
My question is simple. Why use it if you don't like it?
I think you mix two issues
The text you are quoting
"Your basically constantly pushing data through ZA that it has to analyze so there will be more resources used and 50% and more is not unusual with these types of applications."
answered my post #1 in that linked thread.
But my post #7 (and also this thread) is about a different issue:
ZA doesn't have to "analyze" if all its functionalities are disabled.
Yes it DOES!
it is a CORE process running as a service and this behavior is common in many applications. Super Anti-Spyware for instance continues running SASCORE.EXE after shutting down the application.
I linked you to a "cure" for your specific complaint that terminates the service when you terminate the application.
You may not (obviously do not) like how Zone Labs chose to implement their application but it is their application and there is NOTHING insidious about the service left running.
You choose to ignore the responses you don't like and just want someone to agree with you so I will. Yes it is dreadful so change to a different firewall. Microsoft's native firewall doesn't do this but avoid McAfee because it behaves like ZA. Issue solved (and that too was suggested in ZoneLab's responses).
I don't like the gray sky during storms, I prefer green or yellow but they tell me that is just how it is, something to do with light refraction but it isn't that light. Everyone tells me that is just how it is and if I want it different I will have to move to a different universe where the laws of nature are different and I find that to be "a senseless explanation". (I am looking for mutual commiseration here )
"Yes it DOES!" sounds loud but doesn't bring any explanation
Your "cure" didn't cure my mistrust of the company. I had uninstalled ZA and replaced it by Comodo. So you can see I didn't come here with a question "What shall I do?" but rather with "Why (the hell) ZA behaves that way?"
The fact that a similar behavior is common in many applications doesn't explain things.
I agree there is nothing insidious about the service left running: obviously ZA wants to stay and to wait until it is re-enabled. But it is insidious if it loads the processor quite heavily (apparently by monitoring the net traffic).
You probably know the reason why the sky is grey during storms, but I don't see
any reason why ZA does hard work when it is expected to do nothing.
"Why (the hell) ZA behaves that way?"
Since it's not open source, only they can answer. All I can share is we've see this for a very long time. Over a decade and no deep answer. There are guesses but you seem to want better. Back to ZoneLabs?
Re: Back to ZoneLabs?
you mean confiscate from CheckPoint and return to Zonelabs?
But the question was there when Boris was still around.
may Zonealarm be a part of the PRISM program
... or of a similar surveillance program?
Common sense tells me that any malicious/spying behaviour of a security software would be revealed by independent testers sooner or later ... On the other hand, do testers care about such things? I didn't find such a test, it looks testers only care how security products can manage common threats: an example:
I will complete the info I sent in past:
After I uninstalled Zonealarm Firewall I replaced it by Comodo Firewall. So I can compare the load of my CPU by different security programs on my computer and during a 2Mbit/s download:
Avast Free Antivirus (with the Web Shield on) - AvastSvc.exe takes approx. 4% of CPU
Comodo Firewall (with Realtime Protection active) - takes approx. 0% of CPU
ZoneAlarm Free Firewall (with only Program Control and Basic Firewall set on) - vsmon.exe takes approx. 30% of CPU
ZoneAlarm Free Firewall (with every functionality set off, incl. Program Control and Basic Firewall) - vsmon.exe takes approx. 30% of CPU
(The CPU load caused by Avast and Zonealarm depends on the download traffic, so apparently the both monitor every byte of downloaded data)
The unbelievable point is Avast Antivirus must compare the downloaded data with its databases, and still loads the CPU 7 times less than the ZoneAlarm Firewall.