Speakeasy forum

General discussion

When I saw this

by JP Bill / January 18, 2013 8:27 PM PST
Post a reply
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: When I saw this
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: When I saw this
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
and of those human shadow images
by Steven Haninger / January 18, 2013 9:16 PM PST
In reply to: When I saw this

how many would not be there if the current suggestion of restrictions had already been enacted, enforced and (most importantly) obeyed? Guesses acceptable.

Collapse -
All the accidental deaths and all the kids would be alive.
by Ziks511 / January 20, 2013 5:36 PM PST

Which is why I find this issue compelling and important. That's a lot of families scarred for life.

It seems to me that accidental deaths by themselves are a compelling argument for stricter rules about guns and their storage. The Canadian Gun Registry was cancelled by the Conservatives, but the regulations for firearms storage and the secure storage of ammunition are still in force, I believe (but I'm not sure). Separate locks and keys. I also don't know what the rules are in England, but do know that France's gun laws are less restrictive than Britain's.


Collapse -
Did all these accidental deaths come from
by Steven Haninger / January 20, 2013 5:44 PM PST

military assault rifles with large capacity cartridges or guns purchased by mentally ill persons who had not received proper background checks? I think not. The current proposals don't cover accidental deaths caused by the discharge of legally owned and available weapons.

Collapse -
they like to use
by James Denison / January 20, 2013 10:52 PM PST

unusual events to create unusually bad laws.

Collapse -
Show me numbers that would be saved above current progress
by Steven Haninger / January 20, 2013 11:56 PM PST
"The accidental gun death rate has been falling since 1930..."

If the article is correct, the majority of young people killed by guns happen as a result of gang activity related to drugs. What will the new gun control measures do to curb this threat? and how many of these deaths are otherwise innocent ones caught in the crossfire, sitting in their living rooms, etc? Find a way to stop this from happening and you'll make a significant impact on gun related deaths. Make more laws? That doesn't seem to work.
Collapse -
for the purpose of debate on gun control
by Roger NC / January 18, 2013 10:21 PM PST
In reply to: When I saw this

I wonder how many were killed by pistols vs rifles.

I also wonder how many were killed during the commission of crime. It does identify one drive by shooting because a child was killed.

Even if every non-criminal citizen in the US agreed today to eliminate guns, it would be almost impossible for years.

I'm not advocatng that BTW.

Collapse -
True. Any un-baking of this particular political cake will
by Ziks511 / January 19, 2013 10:51 AM PST

take decades, but that's not a reason not to try. The Australian experience is instructive though not easily directly comparable, because gun ownership and gun violence was not nearly so ingrained there nor enshrined in an ill-conceived founding principle. If the Founding Fathers could see what guns have cost the American people in the past 230+ years, I don't think the Second Amendment would be so ambiguous or so absolute. I'm quite sure it would still be there, just worded differently.

Stokely Carmichael (not a preferred source but even an idiot can get one thing right) said "Guns are as American as Apple Pie." While true, Apple Pies are not generally as lethal.


Collapse -
(NT) apple seeds contain cynaide
by Roger NC / January 19, 2013 10:54 AM PST
Collapse -
by TONI H / January 21, 2013 1:01 AM PST

>>>>>>If the Founding Fathers could see what guns have cost the American people in the past 230+ years, I don't think the Second Amendment would be so ambiguous or so absolute>>>>>>>

And if Henry Ford knew how many people would be killed because of his invention, would we still be riding horseback today? BTW........with a speed limit imposed in every state of at most 70 MPH, why is it so important to continue to manufacture automobiles that can go over 100 MPH and nobody says anything about it?

Collapse -
(NT) A lot of people were killed on horseback as well.
by Diana Forum moderator / January 21, 2013 1:47 AM PST
In reply to: Interesting
Collapse -
(NT) Doing things they should, or things they shouldn't?
by Steven Haninger / January 21, 2013 1:51 AM PST
Collapse -
It's all the damned snakes' fault
by TONI H / January 21, 2013 2:45 AM PST

so we have to ban them, too, for causing those horses to rear up and dump the riders on their heads........

Collapse -
And cowboy gunslingers
by Steven Haninger / January 21, 2013 3:02 AM PST

I recently watched an old episode of the "Cisco Kid" and remember the show as a young boy. These guys could shoot a guy at full speed on a horse and he'd be dead before hitting the ground. No horses were ever harmed in these old shows. Pancho (Leo Carillo) was a faithful but somewhat bumbling sidekick of Cisco in that series which, in today's world, would offer a negative stereotype that would cause some to shriek in horror. "How dare anyone air such awful programs!" might be the rant. Yeah...watching that stuff really messed us up. We'd have been better off growing up with today's offerings of non-stop sex and violence. Happy

Collapse -
Memory Lane
by TONI H / January 21, 2013 3:11 AM PST
In reply to: And cowboy gunslingers

"Aunt Jemima", "Amos and Andy", "Sanford & Son", "Jack Benny", to name a few...........

Collapse -
and the horrible thing said by....
by James Denison / January 21, 2013 10:45 AM PST
In reply to: And cowboy gunslingers

...Hopalong Cassidy, when at end of program he'd urge kids to attend sunday school. Roy Rogers did too. Lone Ranger urged belief in the Creator, etc.

Collapse -
Sometimes doing things they shouldn't
by Diana Forum moderator / January 21, 2013 3:23 AM PST

I have an ancestor that went through the Civil War and was killed afterward when his horse shied and he fell off and died.

Horses don't always do what you tell them to. I've been thrown and still have damage to one leg from it.


Collapse -
I'm told there are enough out there now
by drpruner / January 20, 2013 4:38 AM PST

to turn your "years" into "never". Sad

Collapse -
When I saw THIS
by JP Bill / January 18, 2013 11:38 PM PST
In reply to: When I saw this
Collapse -
He had an agenda?
by Steven Haninger / January 19, 2013 12:45 AM PST
In reply to: When I saw THIS

Looks like the Daily News does as well. They chose to use some cell phone photo to advance their cause but without a direct quote or comprehensive statement to support their allegation that the gun was carried as a protest. So while the 2nd amendment is the issue here, it appears that the 1st amendment is working just fine. Wink

Collapse -
Those darn gunowners they also jump to conclusions
by JP Bill / January 19, 2013 3:06 AM PST
In reply to: He had an agenda?
Gun owners: Man's actions hurt us

RIVERDALE — The man who walked into the Riverdale JC Penney store Wednesday with an assault rifle strapped to his back and a pistol clipped to his belt negatively affected gun owners by making his political statement, according to local leaders.

"The guy is an idiot, and I am a big gun right's supporter," said Rep. Paul Ray, R-Clinton.

The man's actions hurt gun owners, the majority of whom are conscientious, Ray said.

It was strictly a political statement, Ray said.

But the person he may have most put in jeopardy was himself, Ray said, by walking into the store with an assault rifle strapped to his back.

Other proponents of gun ownership agree.

"There is no question he is within his rights to carry a firearm. Is he breaking the law? No. But logic would tell you he is creating a situation where others are put in fear," Rep. Brad Dee, R-Washington Terrace.

The man carrying the assault weapon has that right based on the law,

I take it you have absolutely no problems with his actions....Never mind WHY he did it.

Notice, the gun owner referred to it as an "assault weapon".
Collapse -
While it's not something I'd ever do and I would
by Steven Haninger / January 19, 2013 3:49 AM PST

wonder why anyone would, it would be wrong of me to presume what his motive was and then publish it. Apparently, our first amendment doesn't require verification of what is factual before something can go to press.

Collapse -
RE: it would be wrong of me to presume
by JP Bill / January 19, 2013 3:59 AM PST

So, there is absolutely nothing that you would ever presume unless you heard the person say it, hearsay evidence is also out of the question.

Unless you hear it in person...it didn't happen...you know how they can manipulate video and audio now a days.

Since you don't "presume" anything I guess you would have no feelings or apprehension about a stranger with a loaded weapon sitting next to you in church.

You are so full of it....

Good will that is.

Collapse -
I expect that the lady who took out her
by Steven Haninger / January 19, 2013 4:22 AM PST

cell phone to snap the photo didn't feel immediately threatened by the man. Apparently, neither did anyone else...at least enough to call police. The gun was said to have been unloaded and legal to carry in that manner. I'd agree that it may have been foolish. Foolishness isn't anything new in making political statements if that's what it was. People on both sides of the issue, IMO, make both sensible and nonsensical remarks. Enjoy the fun and learn when to duck.

Collapse -
Do you think there will be any people exercising
by JP Bill / January 19, 2013 4:52 AM PST

their 2nd amendment rights at the Inauguration?

Collapse -
(NT) Well...you just might see a few bare arms.
by Steven Haninger / January 19, 2013 5:02 AM PST
Collapse -
I'll bet you won't see anyone "with a set"
by JP Bill / January 19, 2013 5:05 AM PST

as Toni refers to them....

Packing heat at the Inauguration.....THAT'S where you show the strength of your conviction.

Collapse -
(NT) Not a good idea to joke about IMO, JP. Rob
by Ziks511 / January 19, 2013 10:56 AM PST
Collapse -
No one has to grow a set in DC
by TONI H / January 21, 2013 7:43 AM PST

because they would be arrested immediately with or without the inauguration because DC and Chicago *until NYC last week* have the strictest gun laws in the country and still have the highest gun crime rates also in the country. Whereas Utah citizens are legally allowed to carry "unloaded" rifles, including a firearm strapped to their bodies, as long as they are in plain sight......no need for a 'concealed weapon' permit. Just as hunters have mounted rifle/gun racks in their pickup trucks along the back windows.


>>>Utah allows for open carry of unloaded firearms without a concealed firearm permit. "Unloaded" as it applies here, means that there is no round in the firing position (or chamber), and the firearm is at least two "mechanical actions" from firing. As carrying the firearm with the chamber empty, but with a full magazine, meets this definition (the handler must chamber a round, and then pull the trigger), this is a common work around for Utah residents who do not wish to acquire a permit. Without the permit, the firearm must be clearly visible.>>>

It is also a "Stand Your Ground" State........and is one of two states that allows for permit holders to enter a K-12 school with the gun.

Collapse -
what we've give for
by James Denison / January 21, 2013 11:08 AM PST

..... a string of firecrackers? Quickest way to find out where all the SS guys are, lol.

Collapse -
RE: Utah allows for open carry of unloaded firearms
by JP Bill / January 21, 2013 11:17 AM PST

Utah allows for open carry of unloaded firearms

IF they had the Academy Awards and the Red Carpet in Utah, When someone hollers


The response would be?

Bushmaster M4 Type Carbine and a Glock 17 Gen 2 W/4 17 Round.

It's not a weapon....It's a fashion statement.

Popular Forums
Computer Help 49,613 discussions
Computer Newbies 10,349 discussions
Laptops 19,436 discussions
Security 30,426 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 20,308 discussions
Windows 10 360 discussions
Phones 15,802 discussions
Windows 7 7,351 discussions
Networking & Wireless 14,641 discussions


CNET bought a house!

Take a look inside the house where we will be testing connected locks, thermostats and other smart home products so we can tell a complete story.