Networking & Wireless forum


Users unable to connect to wifi (seemingly random)

by gunforhireuk / January 6, 2013 5:27 PM PST

Hi all,

Recently I installed an Asus RT-N66U router to serve a building that houses staff and some guests, in all about 50 people in a given day. By all accounts it's one of the best routers money can buy but we've still been having problems with it. I've been experimenting with it for a while to try and nail down what could be the problem but nothing seems to help.

The network is WPA2 protected and uses the same SSID and password as our company's other wifi networks in other buildings for convenience. Some devices seem to connect just fine - for others, sometimes mobiles sometimes laptops, when trying to connect users are told "Unable to connect to ***". Does anyone have any idea what could be causing this? The router is running on the latest firmware and DHCP is enabled, with a pool of 199 IP addresses. I thought it could be an issue with lease times but whether I put short or long leases, the issue still occurs sporadically.

Any help on this would be massively appreciated because I'm close to pulling out hair.

Answer This Ask For Clarification
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Users unable to connect to wifi (seemingly random)
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Users unable to connect to wifi (seemingly random)
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.

All Answers

Collapse -
In the past
by R. Proffitt Forum moderator / January 7, 2013 1:38 AM PST

We would never run any WAP over a dozen connections. You gone over 10 tens that. Nice idea, if it works but it didn't so if you believe this router can do that many connections then you know who to call next.

You also know that WiFi interference is common but I see no mention of that in your post.

There is a bug that seems to be in many router firmware versions and it's one I encounter a lot. I see no mention of where you tried the latest and a few prior versions.

I'll be honest with you, I would not expect that many connections to work reliably. There are many reasons since you have 50 odd computers and all it takes is one bad one to misbehave and knock others off the air. I mitigate that with more than one WAP.

Collapse -
A bit more info
by gunforhireuk / January 7, 2013 3:21 AM PST
In reply to: In the past

Thanks for your response. I should add some more information, rookie error on my part.

The router is apparently very capable and has highly rated load balance between the 2.4 and 5Ghz bands, hence why I got it. I updated the stock firmware to the most recent which is Version We have two Netgear WN3000RP dual band range extenders at opposite ends of the building from the main router, all of which run on separate channels (1, 7 and 11) for 2.4Ghz connections. Currently the Asus router handles all DHCP requests, although the range extenders are capable of doing this as well. Would you recommend that I offload some of the DHCP requests onto the extenders (which serve a significantly smaller number of machines)?

If not, I have some old Linksys WAG200G ADSL routers that could probably be pressed into service, although they're obviously only B/G devices.

Collapse -
by guitarplayer360 / January 7, 2013 6:14 AM PST
In reply to: A bit more info

"all it takes is one bad one to misbehave and knock others off the air"...not sure what this means. If one machine misbehaves, how would that affect the wireless network? Unless that machine has access to configuration of that router, then there is not much that machine can do.

Based on what you said, there are a few possible reasons this isnt working, but I don't think proffitt is going to help you here...some of those answers are balogna...

Wireless interference is not your problem. This router has been configured as somewhat of an access point to your building's network, correct? It is always reccomended that DHCP should only be done centrally, in one place, as near to your NAT device as possible. Is your router now serving DHCP your entire network? Having multiple DHCP servers is a horrible, horrible idea...don't offload DHCP to your extenders either. You want one single DHCP server, no matter how large your subnet is.

The best way to answer your question is for you to tell us a little bit more about your company's network. Is this router now serving as a gateway? Or is it simply routing packets internally (which I doubt) mention your company has "other wifi networks" in other buildings, but are these buildings connected to yours? Like I mentioned earlier, I doubt this is a physical issue (interference, overload), but a logical issue...

Collapse -
Nice extra info.
by R. Proffitt Forum moderator / January 7, 2013 6:34 AM PST
In reply to: A bit more info

But first, I will not intentional take a swipe at others that want to help you. I'm only an embedded systems designer that wrote some router code in the 90's so my view is from the inside out and recently an incident with Netgear has me wondering about them.

On to work.

At the office we removed all range extenders as they created more trouble than they solved. We moved to WAPs or "routers configured as a WAP." That did wonders for connection issues.

However we did have to find a misbehaving machine in the lot. The neat part was that with only 15 or so connections per access point it was easy to figure out it was in that group. In your case I read all the machines connect to one access point and now extenders.

You may have to think how to get some off loaded onto another access point to figure it out.

And here's a lesson from the field. Ban the 802.11b devices. Your less seasoned networker may not know to do that.

Collapse -
explanation please?
by guitarplayer360 / January 9, 2013 6:30 AM PST
In reply to: Nice extra info.

Can you explain how one bad machine will affect your entire network? Youre answers do not seem to try and solve the user's problem, but rather try to demonstrate your own technical competence...

Explain why he should "ban 802.11b devices" please.

Collapse -
It only affected the one WAP.
by R. Proffitt Forum moderator / January 9, 2013 6:37 AM PST
In reply to: explanation please?

Your posts seem to want to engage me in some other topic about credentials and more. Let's help this member now.

The bad device/PC was easy to find since only that WAP was showing connection issues. We used the old binary search method to find it. As a seasoned tech you may know this one. You install a WAP in the area and you put half of the users on one and the other on the new WAP. If there is a troubled PC it will be in that WAP that has troubles.

So from 15 or less PCs we're down to 7 or 8 and we only have a few more moves to find the machine. Then we can swap out that machine and see if we got it.

Collapse -
PS. About why we banned 802.11b.
by R. Proffitt Forum moderator / January 9, 2013 6:43 AM PST
In reply to: explanation please?

Since the WAPs can't stay at full speed we lose a lot of possible bandwidth. If we did encounter a need for 802.11b it would be a simple matter to put a WAP in for just that area for the 802.11b device.

For the time that an 802.11b spends on air, the 802.11g devices could have moved about 5 times as many bytes as the 802.11b device.

I don't want to upset you but has anyone told you about this?

Popular Forums
Computer Help 49,613 discussions
Computer Newbies 10,349 discussions
Laptops 19,436 discussions
Security 30,426 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 20,308 discussions
Windows 10 360 discussions
Phones 15,802 discussions
Windows 7 7,351 discussions
Networking & Wireless 14,641 discussions

CNET Holiday Gift Guide

Looking for great gifts under $100?

Trendy tech gifts don't require a hefty price tag. Choose from these CNET-recommended useful and high-quality gadgets.