Storage forum

Question

SATA vs IDE Hard Drive Speed For Backup (External Enclosure)

by Merazomo / September 18, 2012 4:44 PM PDT

Windows 7 64-bit
HP Desktop
3 GB Ram
290 GB Hard Drive

Hello, I'm looking to purchase an internal hard drive for backup purposes only. Somebody mentioned that it was cheaper to buy a used internal hard drive, adapt an external enclosure, and use it as an external hard drive. Taking that into consideration, I would only assume that IDE drives are going for a lot cheaper than SATA drives due to age, speed, and technology right?. Just how big is the difference between IDE, SATA, 7200 rpm, 5400 rpm, for backup purposes only.

Answer This Ask For Clarification
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: SATA vs IDE Hard Drive Speed For Backup (External Enclosure)
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: SATA vs IDE Hard Drive Speed For Backup (External Enclosure)
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.

All Answers

Collapse -
Answer
Re: backup
by Kees_B Forum moderator / September 18, 2012 5:15 PM PDT

Both IDE and SATA are faster than the USB (even USB-3) you use to connect the external to. So it makes no difference.

Kees

Collapse -
So ...
by Kees_B Forum moderator / September 18, 2012 6:10 PM PDT
In reply to: Re: backup

an internal hard drive is much faster. But it's less safe as a backup, because:
- you can't store it at another location (to protect against fire, and theft of the PC)
- it's much too easy to delete or files from it by accident
- there is a risk that viruses or power outage or peaks damage or erase the internal hard disk
- it can be infected with malware easier

So maybe you want an internal hard disk for a fast backup, done regularly (a few times a week an incremental backup = only new and changed files) and an external one to use less often.

Your backup strategy is totally your choice.

Kees

Collapse -
Answer
You can look into...
by Willy / September 18, 2012 11:06 PM PDT

If you buy an ext. case, get one that *maybe* optional for either EIDE or SATA use. While it's still connected to the PC via the USB port, it's usually the way to go. The only other option is use of SATA-e provided you have or install a SATA-e port on your PC. You then need an ext. HD case that offers SATA-e as well. This is faster than plain USB, but generally isn't widely accepted. Your last option if you care to be more open to it, is an ext. adapter setup. These accept various connections and even devices that require those ports. google ADA-2020 or similar adapters that use USB ports. Thus, you get your hands on whatever HD is available.

tada -----Willy Happy

Popular Forums
icon
Computer Help 47,885 discussions
icon
Computer Newbies 10,322 discussions
icon
iPhones, iPods, & iPads 3,188 discussions
icon
Security 30,333 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 20,177 discussions
icon
HDTV Picture Setting 1,932 discussions
icon
Phones 15,713 discussions
icon
Windows 7 6,210 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 14,510 discussions

Big stars on small screens

Smosh tells CNET what it took to make it big online

Internet sensations Ian Hecox and Anthony Padilla discuss how YouTube has changed and why among all their goals, "real TV" isn't an ambition.