Computer Newbies forum

General discussion

Ram ??

by Mac252 / July 20, 2004 4:50 AM PDT

Trying to install windows XP only 32mb RAM , says you need at least 64mb RAM. Does this mean I have to get another mother board or can I just get more memory??

Post a reply
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Ram ??
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Ram ??
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
Re: Ram ??
by LarryD / July 20, 2004 4:56 AM PDT
In reply to: Ram ??

You need at least 256 and it runs best with at least 512.

Collapse -
Re: Ram ??
by matted / September 20, 2004 11:32 PM PDT
In reply to: Re: Ram ??

Actually, it runs perfectly fine on 128MB...but I would definately recommend a minimum of 256MB.

Collapse -
With 32MB RAM, you need an OS that fits that machine.
by R. Proffitt Forum moderator / July 20, 2004 5:06 AM PDT
In reply to: Ram ??

XP even at 64 MegaBytes(MB) will crawl so slowly that you may scream loudly what a terrible job Microsoft did on this release.

You should run an OS that fits that size OS. I think I ran a copy of PEANUT LINUX on such, but can't remember if I bumped that up to 64MB.

My advice is to not install XP on less than 256.

Bob

Collapse -
Re: With 32MB RAM, you need an OS that fits that machine.
by Bryanhoop / July 20, 2004 7:02 AM PDT

Wow, you spent 100 dollars on windows xp but you couldn't invest 50 dollars on another 256 megs of RAM? Something doesn't seem right here...are you sure you aren't referring to the memory available on your video card?

Collapse -
Mac, Just A Guess Here....
by Grif Thomas Forum moderator / September 21, 2004 3:31 AM PDT
In reply to: Ram ??

....but it appears like you're trying to install XP on an old computer which may have run Windows 95 or earlier. If that's the case, then you'll need to check the motherboard specs to make sure that it can support more RAM and how much more. Personally, if you can't install at least 256 MB, (and it's very possible that you won't be able to do that on an old board) then it's probably not worth the effort. Although XP will putt along on 128 MB, any other installed programs, such as the antivirus, firewall, etc. will need their fair share also. There's just too much drain when you start using graphics or things that require memory. You won't like the result.

In addition, and most importantly, if it's an older computer, it may be impossible to find the drivers for the motherboard or any of the other hardware that came with the original machine. Check with the manufacturer of each device. You'll need to confirm that you have compatible hardware before attempting the install. The link below should help with that:

Troubleshooting WinXP Setup Problems When You Upgrade

Hope this helps.

Grif

Collapse -
Re: Ram ??
by Willy / September 21, 2004 10:19 PM PDT
In reply to: Ram ??

Come on...that's one of the basic needs and it won't work w/o it or well even if you had 64mb of ram. I strongly suggest you read the requirements for an XP OS install. If you're dealing with an old system, I also suggest you move on to something more capable, as XP won't be happy or you for that matter if only the basic requirements are meant. You may prove it works, but in the long run be perpared for some disapointment. Earlier OS maybe more capable with the system h/w you have, but you didn't mention what that was in the orginal post.

good luck -----Willy Happy

Popular Forums
icon
Computer Help 49,613 discussions
icon
Computer Newbies 10,349 discussions
icon
Laptops 19,436 discussions
icon
Security 30,426 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 20,308 discussions
icon
Windows 10 360 discussions
icon
Phones 15,802 discussions
icon
Windows 7 7,351 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 14,641 discussions

Smartphone tip

Hoarding photos on your phone?

Those picture are hogging memory and could be slowing down your phone.