Forum Announcement

Please don't panic! You are not in the Twilight Zone, you are experiencing the new CNET forums platform! Please click here to read the details. Thanks!!

The CNET Lounge

General discussion

(NT) Will Vista be more succesful then Leopard??

by jchandler15 / September 11, 2006 / 1:35 PM UTC
Post a reply
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: (NT) Will Vista be more succesful then Leopard??
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: (NT) Will Vista be more succesful then Leopard??
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
Define successful
by Dhalgren / September 11, 2006 / 1:41 PM UTC

If you are asking whether there will be more computers with Vista installed than Leopard, I would think that would be pretty clear. Microsoft has a larger market share and the majority of Windows XP users will turn into Vista users eventually. Not to mention that there will probably be OSX users that install Vista on their Mac for use with bootcamp.

Now, if you rate success by user satisfaction, the answer to that is going to be much less clear and I don't think you'll ever get a satisfactory answer.

BTW, I am posting this using Vista RC1 and Firefox 2.0 Beta. I am not planning on installing Vista on a production machine until it's been out for at least a year, though. Maybe even longer if there are still security issues at that time. I only installed it on this machine because I do tech support for computers and I wanted to become familiar with the OS before I have to support it.

Collapse -
RC1 and a Beta firefox?
by jsgerhard / October 21, 2006 / 4:30 PM UTC
In reply to: Define successful

Wow, living dangerously are we?
...we dont need no stinking stable versions...
(of course if you waited for a stable version you would never use windows... and I still would be drafting by hand)

Collapse -
thats like saying
by Jonathan.C / September 12, 2006 / 7:51 AM UTC

"will sony DRM technology become well-accepted with consumers?"

in my opinion, vista may catch on with its loyal fanbase, but with its delays and such...don't be suprised if more traffic goes to leopard

Collapse -
RE:thats like saying
by jchandler15 / October 21, 2006 / 3:19 PM UTC
In reply to: thats like saying

Well you know I think most people believe that DRM is a failure and that companies need to think of better protection to prevent people copying the file freely, yet I don't know really. How do you choose which one is better they are similar in some ways

Collapse -
Umm. Yes.
by navsimpson / October 21, 2006 / 6:17 PM UTC

In other news: the new iPods will sell more than any other DAP while there are some subtle and quiet rumours that PS3 is running into some troubles.

Popular Forums
icon
Computer Help 45,842 discussions
icon
Computer Newbies 10,052 discussions
icon
Tablets 1,149 discussions
icon
Security 28,606 discussions
icon
Home Audio and Video 18,995 discussions
icon
HDTV Picture Setting 1,743 discussions
icon
Cell Phones 11,258 discussions
icon
Windows 8 1,311 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 10,496 discussions