Cameras forum

General discussion

Nikkor 28mm 2.8 vs Nikkor 35mm 1.8 af-s dx

by wolfbreath / January 30, 2011 10:52 PM PST

Looking for a fixed wide angle lens that will not cost me an arm and a leg. Currently, my lens of choice is the Nikkor 50mm 1.8d. The quality is just unparalleled, but I want a wide angle lens of similar (if not better) image quality. I hear good things about both lenses, and then I read bad things too. Is the soft focus and vignetting on the 28mm that bad? How about the chromatic aberration on the 35mm? The chromatic aberration on the 18-55mm af-s kit lens was terrible (to me), so I sold it. I read reviews and need some real world comparison from users. I'd like a nice wide angle look for landscape or indoor photography. Quality pictures in low light situations is definitely a plus.

Post a reply
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Nikkor 28mm 2.8 vs Nikkor 35mm 1.8 af-s dx
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Nikkor 28mm 2.8 vs Nikkor 35mm 1.8 af-s dx
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
by snapshot2 Forum moderator / January 31, 2011 5:36 AM PST
Collapse -
cool page
by wolfbreath / January 31, 2011 12:23 PM PST
In reply to: Camera

Nikon D90. DSLR not full frame format.

Also, I should be more specific, I meant the Nikkor 28mm 2.8D

Collapse -
oh and....
by wolfbreath / January 31, 2011 12:38 PM PST
In reply to: cool page

also, while the view angle is really cool on this page, I guess I'm more interested in picture quality. if one is substantially better than the other...

Collapse -
by PistonCupChampion / February 1, 2011 3:13 PM PST
In reply to: oh and.... has tested both lenses. They much prefer the 35mm lens, giving it four out of five stars for optical quality, and a full five stars for price/performance. The main drawback of the 35mm is that on your D90, the crop factor will give you an angle of view like a 52.5mm lens on a full frame camera...not wide at all.

Collapse -
35mm it is!
by wolfbreath / February 2, 2011 3:06 AM PST
In reply to: Verdict

Yeah, after reading more about it and comparing picture samples, I feel 35mm DX would be best to get next. Its not that wide, but that's ok, it'll give me more to work with than the 50mm.

Popular Forums
Computer Help 49,613 discussions
Computer Newbies 10,349 discussions
Laptops 19,436 discussions
Security 30,426 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 20,308 discussions
Windows 10 360 discussions
Phones 15,802 discussions
Windows 7 7,351 discussions
Networking & Wireless 14,641 discussions


Big screens for the big game

Still looking for the best TV deals ahead of Sunday's game? Here are our top three big screen picks.