Windows Legacy OS forum

General discussion

.net 2.0 and .net 1.1

by provoko / November 10, 2005 12:58 PM PST

I just installed .net 2.0 from windows update. After installing 2.0, windows update still says 1.1 to install. Does that mean 2.0 and 1.1 are seperate and I need to install both?

There are a few programs I have that need .net 1.1, won't 2.0 be fine for them or do I really need to install both 1.1 and 2.0?

Thanks.

Post a reply
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: .net 2.0 and .net 1.1
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: .net 2.0 and .net 1.1
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
Should only need 2.0
by thought_stazi / November 10, 2005 7:37 PM PST
In reply to: .net 2.0 and .net 1.1

It SHOULD be backwards compatible with 1.0 and 1.1, but it is Microsoft we're talking about, and they're usually least compatible with themselves.

Collapse -
Ah! I'll wait
by ankitmathur / November 11, 2005 3:21 AM PST
In reply to: Should only need 2.0

I too was thinking of upating it with latest updates. After reading your posts perhaps I'll be more watchful on this topic & allow MS to cover-up their pitfalls first.

By the way the product code of .Net 2.0 (KB829019) is still not available to be downloaded from Microsoft Downloads as a stand-alone desktop download.

Perhaps its still in test phase with the users who download it now.

Collapse -
You only need one version
by Dutchmants / November 11, 2005 4:16 AM PST
In reply to: .net 2.0 and .net 1.1

You can actually go into add remove programs remove all .net installs and patches then go to the Windows update site and both 1.1 and 2.0 will be presented as options (for now). If you choose to reinstall 1.1 there will also be one or more patches that will you will need to install after the initial install. IF you install 2.0 no other .net patches will appear after you reboot.

While in theory you should be able to upgrade to 2.0 and have every things work you should be aware the possibility exists that some software developers code may fail following the upgrade. ESRI one of the best known GIS application developers have known issues with 2.0 and many things will start failing with their applications if you install the upgrade. The solution in their case is to back out all .net installs then reinstall 1.1 plus patches. Now I'm not saying ESRI is the best example to hold out to the world while they are known as industry leaders in the GIS field they also seem to produce code with many little got ya compatibility issues.

Collapse -
what should i do?
by provoko / November 12, 2005 4:07 AM PST

So what should I do? Should I uninstall everything and install just 2.0? Or should I uninstall everything and install 1.1 then 2.0?

Collapse -
(NT) (NT) I assume you are discussing Microsoft .net Framework
by rgfitz / November 12, 2005 8:15 AM PST
In reply to: See if this helps
Collapse -
Thanks, only need one,. (nt)
by provoko / November 13, 2005 2:17 AM PST
In reply to: See if this helps

nt

Popular Forums
icon
Computer Help 47,885 discussions
icon
Computer Newbies 10,322 discussions
icon
iPhones, iPods, & iPads 3,188 discussions
icon
Security 30,333 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 20,177 discussions
icon
HDTV Picture Setting 1,932 discussions
icon
Phones 15,713 discussions
icon
Windows 7 6,210 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 14,510 discussions

Big stars on small screens

Smosh tells CNET what it took to make it big online

Internet sensations Ian Hecox and Anthony Padilla discuss how YouTube has changed and why among all their goals, "real TV" isn't an ambition.