Speakeasy forum

General discussion

Lifeguard fired for saving drowning man

by Josh K / July 5, 2012 5:52 AM PDT
http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/05/us/florida-lifeguard-fired/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

Why did they fire him? For saving the life of a man who was swimming outside the designated "protected" area. What was this kid supposed to do, just watch the guy drown?

I can see them having the lifeguards sign a waiver saying the company won't be responsible for any injuries they incur while rescuing someone who is outside the protected area, but to fire someone for doing it is insane.
Post a reply
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Lifeguard fired for saving drowning man
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Lifeguard fired for saving drowning man
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
Protocol was to call 911 and wait.
by grimgraphix / July 5, 2012 6:13 AM PDT

... which made me wonder.

Would the Life Guard have been liable under any good samaritan laws, for NOT acting to save the drowning victim?

Collapse -
Not under any good samaritan laws
by Steven Haninger / July 5, 2012 7:09 AM PDT

Those only protect, and only to some extent, those who choose to help. They don't require anyone to offer help...at least as I understand it.

Collapse -
As I understand this,the president of the company,Jeff Ellis
by Tony Holmes / July 5, 2012 7:50 AM PDT

offered this hero his job back and there is no word yet on the fate of 9 other lifeguards who quit in a show of solidarity with the kid.WTF!!!!!!!!!!!

Excuse me while I rant!....................

Ellis,you're a politically correct *******,who gives a crap if this kid was "out of bounds",he saved a fellow human's life,wtf is more imporatant that that,you ******???

I've got a much better idea Ellis,why don't you fire your incredibly stupid wife instead of that kid,she's the one who fired him!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

As per your link Josh:

"Company supervisor Susan Ellis told WPTV that Lopez was let go for violating company policy."

So then,I guess it's safe to assume that it's the policy of *Susan Ellis* to let one of your lifeguards watch a man drown when he could have saved him???

Right now,Ellis I'm wondering if your stupid family grew up near high voltage power lines.

I'm sorry but it's been a long,hot day and I have a rather low tolerance level for "BS" morons.!!!!!

Collapse -
As much as we butt heads here, Tony, I agree totally.
by Ziks511 / July 5, 2012 9:23 AM PDT

This is a clear example of why you shouldn't hire relatives with little experience and no judgement to work in your company. (i.e. Nepotism) I'd love to see the other 9 interviewed to find out what kind of boss she was. She sounds like a heartless barracuda, which are so often employed to manage employees.

It is possible that they may have been worried about legal and insurance liability, (which is the result and responsibility of lawyers over the years who have sued successfully when rescue attempts have failed, or have saved people otherwise so brain damaged that they never wake up). That is a travesty of the intent of the legal system.

And given current Temperatures, since this is the first day in perhaps 2 weeks that Toronto has been only in the low 80's instead of humid and near 90, I understand your irritability.

Climate Canada or whatever they're called measure the temperatures at Toronto International Airport, actually sited in any part of Toronto but in Mississauga next door, in a weather station surrounded by grass and open spaces, subject to cooling breezes. Toronto proper is from 5 to 15 degrees warmer in summer because of the concrete and tarmac asphalt on the streets and the reflections from the mirrored buildings. Last week the asphalt was buckling on some roads.

Hope you don't mind my sharing a rant of my own, Tony.

Cheers,
Rob

Popular Forums
icon
Computer Help 47,885 discussions
icon
Computer Newbies 10,322 discussions
icon
iPhones, iPods, & iPads 3,188 discussions
icon
Security 30,333 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 20,177 discussions
icon
HDTV Picture Setting 1,932 discussions
icon
Phones 15,713 discussions
icon
Windows 7 6,210 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 14,510 discussions

Big stars on small screens

Smosh tells CNET what it took to make it big online

Internet sensations Ian Hecox and Anthony Padilla discuss how YouTube has changed and why among all their goals, "real TV" isn't an ambition.