I can say I am not surprised, the man is a politician...
| Forum Announcement |
Please don't panic! You are not in the Twilight Zone, you are experiencing the new CNET forums platform! Please click here to read the details. Thanks!!
I had the same question as above re: vetting skills. Now, when it seems to be a staff member I feel a little bit better--you can't vet everyone the guy knows--but I'm left with 2 concerns: If you're the boss, then you're responsible for your staff--how do so many of your people get away with something like this? and Why are they putting Kundra on leave? Makes me worried that there's another show waiting to drop.
It is very curious how this seems to be happening so prevalently in the Obama administration. What else is going on, that we don't know about? Conspiracy theorists could argue that the rash of political scandals are the work of the previous administration doing anything to dis-credit folks in the Obama camp. If not the previous administration, then may another party deeper in the mess of American politics.
Why would all of this come to light now? Perhaps those holding the closet doors closed are no longer willing to and are bowing to some unforeseen pressure. I am quite confident that the goings on here will be in some tell-all book a couple of years from now.
The OP makes it clear that it is not directly involving Kundra:
"there is no indication at all that the FBI raid has any direct involvement with Vivek Kundra".
Another notes he went on leave, but includes: "Kundra does not appear to be a target of the investigation." and "Kundra's name does not appear anywhere in the documents."
I noted it wasn't Kundra but worry about his management skills and didn't understand why he went on leave.
The next post is about conspiracy theory, definitely NOT against Kundra et al: "could argue that the rash of political scandals are the work of the previous administration doing anything to dis-credit folks in the Obama camp".
So, when you subtract Shalin saying this must be frustrating--which clearly it has to be--you end up with 2 out of 8 posts which sort of do what you're saying happened in all of them.