PC Hardware forum

General discussion

cd burn speed

by bagadonut / August 18, 2014 3:54 AM PDT

we have had a discussion about is a slow burn say 16-20x safer than a fast burn say 40-52x i say slow the only couple of cds that have gone bad well i had 3 over maybe 450 or so burns 2 out of 3 were high spd and IF so then why bother with high spd

Post a reply
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: cd burn speed
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: cd burn speed
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
Do you have access to a MicroScope?
by R. Proffitt Forum moderator / August 18, 2014 4:14 AM PDT
In reply to: cd burn speed

If so, look at the quality of the burn pits at low and high speed. Here we saw the best defined pits at 2x speed. So if I have the time I reduce the speed for a quality burn. However consumers are obsessed with speed no matter the cost.
Bob

Collapse -
Slower is better
by Willy / August 20, 2014 1:42 AM PDT
In reply to: cd burn speed

I tend to burn at 1/2 the speed and generally been very happy. However, if you have a task of doing 10-100's of burns then you push your luck at higher speeds even if capable. The idea behind slower speeds is the full-effect of doing the burn because the time hovering at a given space is greatly enhanced and/or improved because it doesn't hurry along. If the disks you burn are only used to spread info/data and not to be stored for long periods, it may do quite well otherwise it may fail sooner on repeated usage and/or "reads" as the case maybe excluding human handling or mounting.

tada -----Willy Happy

Popular Forums
icon
Computer Help 47,885 discussions
icon
Computer Newbies 10,322 discussions
icon
iPhones, iPods, & iPads 3,188 discussions
icon
Security 30,333 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 20,177 discussions
icon
HDTV Picture Setting 1,932 discussions
icon
Phones 15,713 discussions
icon
Windows 7 6,210 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 14,510 discussions

Big stars on small screens

Smosh tells CNET what it took to make it big online

Internet sensations Ian Hecox and Anthony Padilla discuss how YouTube has changed and why among all their goals, "real TV" isn't an ambition.