Cameras forum

General discussion

Canon Powershot SD1100 IS or Kodak Easyshare M1093 IS?

by pillsburyhitman / August 1, 2009 9:40 AM PDT

I'm looking for a little buying advice between two extremely inexpensive ultracompacts, the Canon Powershot SD1100 IS (which I am able to obtain on clearance at a nearby store for $89) and the Kodak Easyshare M1093 I, which is widely available on eBay for around $100.

When it comes to cameras I'm only a sliver more savvy than your average amateur, but I'm basically looking for an extremely portable device that I can use in a pinch both for casual social photos and for developing my rather atrophied photographic skills (I'll likely be taking a lot of simple landscaping shots, portraits, basic scenery, and perhaps a few casual modeling pics of some of my more photogenic friends). I will need it primarily for outdoor use, but I'd also like to be able to take some quality indoor photos during events like dances, weddings, campus activities, etc., so whichever camera can shoot more reliably in the 500+ ISO range would have an edge for me.

Based on the reviews I've read, both cameras seem quite appropriate for my needs (particularly my budgetary needs!), but I'm at something of an impasse in that the one-year release expanse between the two models makes comparison shopping seem rather tricky. In general, the reviews of the Powershot seem more positive than those of the Easyshare, but I'm hesitant to take that as a reliable indicator given the Powershot's age over the Easyshare. In other words, I worry that standards have risen enough to render an only entry-level camera of today, i.e. the Easyshare, more than a match for the higher mid-range camera of yesteryear, i.e. the Powershot. Are the highly-advertised high definition capabilities of the Easyshare a significant enough advantage to overshadow a unit without them? Also, I strongly prefer to have the option of setting shots with an optical viewfinder (given what a pain in the *** digital viewfinders can be to view in sunny conditions), which the Powershot has, but reviewers seem unanimous in their appraisal of that particular viewfinder as next-to-useless due to its "minuscule" size. Have users of the Powershot found this to be true?

Any advice will be much appreciated, as will other suggestions if anyone knows of alternative cameras of this caliber in the same price range.

Post a reply
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Canon Powershot SD1100 IS or Kodak Easyshare M1093 IS?
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Canon Powershot SD1100 IS or Kodak Easyshare M1093 IS?
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
Canon SD1100IS- Kodak M1093IS
by snapshot2 Forum moderator / August 1, 2009 12:11 PM PDT

Both are good choices in the low cost price range.

I don't think you will find anything better for that price.

Picture quality is good for both.

The ISO 400 setting is not too bad, but anything beyond that will have noticeable noise on any print above 4 x 6 inches.
But that is about par for the course on all small cameras.

The Canon shutter lag is about 0.3 second, while the Kodak shutter lag is about twice as long.
That might trouble some people.

You might have to toss a coin, considering the prices you quote.


Collapse -
no contest
by fihart / August 2, 2009 8:38 AM PDT

The Canon has an optical viewfinder (apparently with zoom indication) and as far as I can see the Kodak doesn't.

Having recently switched to a camera without an optical viewfinder, I'll soon be looking at a Canon (perhaps the one you mention) simply because Canon continue to include optical viewfinders on almost all their models. In a bright sunshine or if your battery is running low, it's essential in my view.

Collapse -
Viewfinder is a must for me.
by nycboy0156 / August 14, 2009 8:39 AM PDT

I have the Canon SD1000 and the SD1200 IS and I do use the viewfinder when taking all my shots. This allows me to keep the lcd off all the time which extends battery life dramatically. Yes, it is small, but I have no trouble framing shots through it. Ever try taking a photo in bright sunlight using an LCD? Best of luck. Canon is your best bet, if the viewfinder is an issue for you, go check one out at your local "Big Box" store and see if YOU find it unusable.

Popular Forums
Computer Help 49,613 discussions
Computer Newbies 10,349 discussions
Laptops 19,436 discussions
Security 30,426 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 20,308 discussions
Windows 10 360 discussions
Phones 15,802 discussions
Windows 7 7,351 discussions
Networking & Wireless 14,641 discussions


$16,000 used SUVs

Whether you like your SUVs cute or capable, or some blend of the two, we've got a wide variety of choices in Roadshow's first collection of Editors' Used Picks.