Cameras forum

General discussion

Best camera for taking pictures of kids

by youron589 / May 17, 2011 9:43 AM PDT

Hey guys I'm looking for the best camera I could get for $300 or less for taking pictures of my 2 year old. I need a quick shutter speed . He is fast. Thanks for the help.

Post a reply
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Best camera for taking pictures of kids
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Best camera for taking pictures of kids
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
Shutter lag and other issues
by PistonCupChampion / May 17, 2011 11:51 AM PDT

Outdoors in good light, any camera with minimal shutter lag will do the job. Indoors and/or in low light is where compact cameras have problems keeping up. Because they have small imaging sensors and small lenses, they cannot capture enough light. This causes the shutter to stay open longer, and the result is blurred photos. Compact cameras also use a focusing system that relies on contrast, something that begins to fade in low light. This causes the camera to take longer to focus; the result is missed shots.

The short answer is that compact cameras will be fine in good light. No compact camera will be very good at capturing action indoors.

Collapse -
Also interested in an answer to this
by sarahlizz3 / October 22, 2011 11:41 PM PDT

@PistonCupChampion: I understand what you are saying here, but this is not a helpful response. Some cameras are still better than others at capturing actions shots. Mine takes so long that everything is out of the frame (pets, adults, kids, etc) by the time the picture actually takes. To say that none are good will not help someone choose a camera.

Collapse -
Better = More Money
by PistonCupChampion / October 23, 2011 1:18 PM PDT

As I wrote before, there are separate issues in play. Some cameras do have less shutter lag, but even if a camera has less lag, unless it can capture enough light indoors, it can still generate a blurry shot. To capture more light means a bigger/better sensor and/or a brighter lens. Those things typically do not exist on cameras under $300.

All of the above is assuming taking photos without flash. With flash, small cameras can be quick, but the flash is very limited in range, usually only a couple of meters. One other point: all cameras are quick using pre-focus, i.e. pressing the shutter button half-way, composing the shot, then fully depressing the shutter button.

Popular Forums
icon
Computer Help 49,613 discussions
icon
Computer Newbies 10,349 discussions
icon
Laptops 19,436 discussions
icon
Security 30,426 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 20,308 discussions
icon
Windows 10 360 discussions
icon
Phones 15,802 discussions
icon
Windows 7 7,351 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 14,641 discussions

Tech explained

Do you know what an OLED TV is?

CNET explains how OLED technology differs from regular TVs, and what you need to know to make the right shopping decision.