Speakeasy forum

General discussion

Another senseless killing but gun used is legal

by Steven Haninger / June 23, 2013 9:41 PM PDT
Would-be robber killed by man coveting LeBron James shoes

A senseless death during a senseless quest. Who can blame a person for wanting to be armed for protection in a world where police can't be everywhere that danger lies? And just how important can it be to have a pair of over-priced shoes? Mixed up priorities by one party become an opportunity for an ill intentioned party to exploit.
Post a reply
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Another senseless killing but gun used is legal
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Another senseless killing but gun used is legal
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
Depends on POV
by Willy / June 24, 2013 12:46 AM PDT

Here we have someone that wants something "ill-gotten" using armed force. The reply was armed force in return, it was justified. I can't see it any other way, unless, well unless something is left out. It might be a pair of shoes, but then it doesn't matter is was the method involved and quite frankly no time wasted in courts, yada, yada. The villain decided their own fate here and got their just rewards. Hope it never happens to you w/o some defense to deter. ------Willy Happy

Collapse -
I'm not faulting the guy with the gun
by Steven Haninger / June 24, 2013 2:39 AM PDT
In reply to: Depends on POV

I'm just saying it was, in hindsight anyway, a dumb scene to set up. Indications are that such people who lined up early for the shoes, were not interested in wearing them but selling them at a higher price. They'd been there for hours and possibly in the dark with pockets full of cash. It doesn't get much dumber than that. Happy

Collapse -
What would have been fitting
by James Denison / June 24, 2013 5:25 AM PDT

is to have shot him in the feett and then given him the shoes he no longer could wear.

Collapse -
You must not have read the article
by Steven Haninger / June 24, 2013 6:18 AM PDT

No one had or wanted the shoes. It was a mini Black Friday scene with people lining up to buy the first issue of the sneakers and then turn around and sell them at a profit.

Collapse -
I know that theft used to be viewed as a capital crime
by Ziks511 / June 27, 2013 11:47 PM PDT

but haven't we gotten past that Wild West attitude. That's a view common to Dickensian London, and it didn't work as a deterrent then either.

Shoot him in the ***, or in the leg if you're close enough, or just let it go and file a report and an insurance claim. People who kill other people are scarred for life by it. Ask any Vet.

Rob

Popular Forums
icon
Computer Help 47,885 discussions
icon
Computer Newbies 10,322 discussions
icon
iPhones, iPods, & iPads 3,188 discussions
icon
Security 30,333 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 20,177 discussions
icon
HDTV Picture Setting 1,932 discussions
icon
Phones 15,713 discussions
icon
Windows 7 6,210 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 14,510 discussions

Big stars on small screens

Smosh tells CNET what it took to make it big online

Internet sensations Ian Hecox and Anthony Padilla discuss how YouTube has changed and why among all their goals, "real TV" isn't an ambition.