A sign of Red Hat and Ubuntu competition to come?

Is Linux its own worst enemy? Will its stability and performance lead customers to opt for free Linux rather than supported, fee-based Linux?

What happens to the disrupter when it is disrupted? That's the question I asked myself while reading this article in LinuxWorld. As more enterprises grow comfortable with Linux, is it possible that they will move from their first Linux vendor (generally Red Hat) to Ubuntu as a way to lower costs further?

The article describes a small telco in Australia that recently dropped Red Hat for some of its servers in favor of Ubuntu. The article stresses that the decision wasn't about cost:

[The telco] said the reasons for moving from the pay-for Red Hat to the zero-cost Ubuntu was not so much about the price, as Locatrix still runs a bit of Red Hat for front-end workloads, but was more about Ubuntu's ability to install new software seamlessly.

In this case, then, it wasn't a cost-driven decision. The telco mentioned that it's a very engineering-driven organization and so can afford to go the self-support route.

But what happens when Linux "just works." All the time? Does the very stability of Red Hat Enterprise Linux mean that it's paving the way for up-and-coming projects like Ubuntu to do precisely what Linux originally did to Unix? Namely, start at the edge of the network and work its way into mission-critical installations?

Sounds Oedipal....

Featured Video
6
This content is rated TV-MA, and is for viewers 18 years or older. Are you of age?
Sorry, you are not old enough to view this content.

As Xbox One gets a little sweeter, HoloLens gets Xbox Live

Microsoft announces new features coming to Xbox One, including the ability to record TV shows. Also, the company opens up Xbox Live to HoloLens programmers.

by Bridget Carey