The electronics titans square off in a tangled tale of mobile technology, centered on Apple's iPhone and iPad, that delves into where one company's designs end and another's begin.
Judge Lucy Koh earlier this week ruled not to institute a permanent injunction against Samsung for selling older-model smartphones found to infringe Apple patents.
A US judge rules that Apple won't "suffer irreparable harm" if Samsung continues to sell various older smartphone models that may include patent-infringing components.
The decision by the USPTO, while relevant to the most recent Apple v. Samsung patent-infringement trial, isn't final and could take months or years to come to conclusion.
TSMC may still have to compete with Samsung for processor orders from Apple, according to a report.
An analyst predicts that sales growth for Apple's smartphone will double that of Samsung's in the second quarter -- though Samsung still remains the undisputed champion of smartphone sales.
Samsung may have been found to infringe some of Apple’s patents, but the iPhone maker won’t see any money from the latest verdict, predicts Samsung’s outspoken attorney.
The tech companies battled in a San Jose, Calif., court over patents. CNET breaks down what happened during the monthlong trial.
If Apple thinks Google's Android infringes its mobile tech, the two should go head-to-head, jury members in the Apple v. Samsung trial say.
The jury awarded Apple $4 million in additional damages for one version of the Galaxy S2, but lowered the amount on another variant, leaving the total unchanged.
The world’s largest makers of smartphones were awarded damages in their patent trial. But their reputations likely took a hit.
The jury has returned its verdict in this year's big Apple v. Samsung case. Check out what devices were found to violate which patents.
A jury tells Samsung to pay Apple $119.6 million for infringing some of its patents, while Apple owes Samsung $158,400 for infringing one of the Korean company's patents.