The electronics titans square off in a tangled tale of mobile technology, centered on Apple's iPhone and iPad, that delves into where one company's designs end and another's begin.
We see which phone takes better shots in low-light -- the iPhone 6S Plus, the Samsung Galaxy S6 or the older iPhone 6.
A ruling says a lower court erred when it didn't ban Samsung products related to a patent infringement suit from 2014.
Apple says it's on track to sell more new iPhones during this year's initial weekend than it did last year. China will play a significant role in that, according to Piper Jaffray's Gene Munster.
The US Federal Circuit Court of Appeals' decision means Samsung has two options: appeal the case to the Supreme Court or hand over to Apple hundreds of millions of dollars.
Judge Lucy Koh earlier this week ruled not to institute a permanent injunction against Samsung for selling older-model smartphones found to infringe Apple patents.
A US judge rules that Apple won't "suffer irreparable harm" if Samsung continues to sell various older smartphone models that may include patent-infringing components.
The decision by the USPTO, while relevant to the most recent Apple v. Samsung patent-infringement trial, isn't final and could take months or years to come to conclusion.
TSMC may still have to compete with Samsung for processor orders from Apple, according to a report.
An analyst predicts that sales growth for Apple's smartphone will double that of Samsung's in the second quarter -- though Samsung still remains the undisputed champion of smartphone sales.
Samsung may have been found to infringe some of Apple’s patents, but the iPhone maker won’t see any money from the latest verdict, predicts Samsung’s outspoken attorney.
The tech companies battled in a San Jose, Calif., court over patents. CNET breaks down what happened during the monthlong trial.
If Apple thinks Google's Android infringes its mobile tech, the two should go head-to-head, jury members in the Apple v. Samsung trial say.