• Home
• Reviews
• News
• Downloads
• CNET TV

About me

• Member since: June 14, 2008

My posting summary

1 to 1 of 1

My comments

• The reason "Hydrogen Creation" in your home doesn't make sense like it does in your car is because you don't have copious amounts of unused electricity like you do in a typical car with an alternator. You would have to BUY that electricity as a stand-alone transaction -not get it as a wasted byproduct. That simple reclaimation is probably a good part of the reported 'effeciencies' in the system. And the amount of Hydrogen here is not a lot. These are relative small amounts, used as they are created -not stored. You DON'T want a lot of Hydrogen in your vehicle -small incidents like the Hindenburg illustrate that point for me. Regardless of the science, I'm gonna BET that Ronn auto didn't choose this system soley off the mathematics -NOR due to marketing or spelling on the part of Hydrorunner. I BET they actually Tried it on the engine they chose and found that it works -at least well enough to offer advantages over foregoing the system. Today's hairbrained ideas are going to be the BASIS of our transportation technology of tomorrow. It's already happening -thank GOD! In reply to: "Scorpion sportscar would burn gasoline and hydrogen"

  June 13, 2008

  0 replies