• Home
• Reviews
• News
• Downloads
• CNET TV

About me

My posting summary

1 to 1 of 1

My comments

• Nice contradiction within a few short paragraphs.
  
  First you deride the interoperability of SuSE and Microsoft within
  each others virtualization technologies (yet somehow manage to
  say that Red Hat is making "huge strides" in virtualization when
  Novell and Red Hat use the same Xen virtualization technology)
  and then you go on to say that it's about time they started making
  things work together.
  
  If you think that companies should be making their software work
  together, then why do you deride Suse as fading from relevance
  outside of MS?
  
  Which is it?
  
  SAP recommends Suse for customers that want to run SAP on Linux,
  does this mean that Suse has fading relevance outside of SAP?
  
  What are these "huge strides" Red Hat and Sun are making?
  How about some numbers showing the poor performance of Hyper-V
  compared to other solutions that you allude to?
  
  Your statements are all rhetoric and no substance. In reply to: "Suse Linux virtualized on Windows--why?"

  September 11, 2008

  0 replies