• Home
• Reviews
• News
• Downloads
• CNET TV

About me

My posting summary

1 to 4 of 4

My comments

• I'm only educated enough to see the bias
  Seriously? 20 seconds into Google and I can find one of the missing Republicans (Mitt Romney) has been interviewed by Tech Crunch here:
  
  http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/mitt-romney/
  
  So is c|Net a hack outfit that can't get a date with a candidate because they would as "Have you quit beating your wife yet" style questions.
  
  Tech Crunch got an interview - maybe because they weren't running an *agenda* (which was the whole point of my comment obviously lost on the "educated" crowd.)
  
  It's not that hard to be even handed - this is just blatant, not that I expect any less from the San Fran based c|Net. Note to c|Net Editors: Stick to astroturfing for your fav OS or whatever non-political technical crap gains you traffic.

  January 2, 2008

  0 replies

• Are you one of the "educated and intelligent" readers?
  You didn't obviously read my post and just pulled the elitist, educated card with a sheeple comment thrown in for good measure... Oh the humanity.
  
  So, your *educated* mind didn't pick up in my comment that the ORDER of their appearance/listing is *not* the issue (just mentioned only to highlight general position of a candidate featured). The *real* problem is WHO is there: Just liberals, a RINO and a crank.
  
  Strike two for your justification of alphabetical ordering (I can see you only read the RIGHT column). If your *educated* eye would look a little closer to the left (go figure), you would see that Clinton and Obama are getting pumped BEFORE Iowa caucuses. How about that for marginalizing Edwards and Dodd!
  
  If it was *fair*, all Dems on one day and all Reps on another before/on Iowa caucus. For good measure, my comment shows not only the bias for liberals, but the specific liberals that C|Net wants to pump - Clinton and Obama, not some "stupid" Republican issue...

  January 2, 2008

  1 reply

• There's NO biased agenda here... Move along!
  Notwithstanding the weak and convenient Editor's Note regarding the people they solicited, all I see (in order) is a liberal, liberal, populist liberal, Shamnesty RINO, liberal, and last but not least, our favorite Birchesque Crank, Ron Paul.
  
  Real nice, rounded coverage there cNet!

  January 2, 2008

  4 replies

• How you solve it is more important
  After watching it and listening to how people approached the problem, it's great to see the diversity of solutions. Problem I see is you have MIT doing something SO ridiculous with having a super computer with its own gen-set and air conditioner for the cluster computer (40 cores), getting SPANKED by Stanford running TWO PC's (1-Q6600/box) in Junior. Even though I'm no fan of Stanford, it's absolutely refreshing to see an *elegant* solution doing well in this environment as that is what is really needed. I don't think anyone wants to fill up for both a gen-set and the engine at the pump...

  November 5, 2007

  0 replies