Revolutn's community profile

1 to 10 of 15

My comments

Only 1 candidate will protect the Net in 08
If you want to keep the internet free of regulation and taxes at a national level, there is only ONE candidate running for the White House in 2008 who is already ON THE RECORD and has a proven voting track record of voting against ANY bill for net regulation or taxes.

His name is Ron Paul, consider supporting him if you want the internet to remain unregulated.

Hillary won't protect the net.
O'Bama won't
McCain won't
Giuliani won't

ronpaul2008 com

And I know the ban on net taxes will expire before the 2008 elections, but if the conartists currently in control ram taxes or regulations through now, it's still only Ron Paul who would repeal them once he were to get into office.

Later,
Rev

Infowars because there IS a war on for your mind
May 25, 2007

2 replies

Only 1 08 candidate won't tax the net
If you want to keep the internet free of regulation and taxes at a national level, there is only ONE candidate running for the White House in 2008 who is already ON THE RECORD and has a proven voting track record of voting against ANY bill for net regulation or taxes.

His name is Ron Paul, consider supporting him if you want the internet to remain unregulated.

ronpaul2008 com

Later,
Rev

Infowars because there IS a war on for your mind
May 25, 2007

1 reply

4get the speed COLOR is wrong
Uh I might be daft but shouldn't the car be.....

Oh say a combination of Black Yellow and White like Tux?

Baby Blue?! bleh.

Oh well Go # 77.

Go Ron Paul!

Let the revolution start at every level, OS and nationally.

Later,
Rev

Infowars because there IS a war on for your mind
May 25, 2007

0 replies

Cast no stone
"Would readers cut The New York Times the same slack?"

Media personnel should not throw stones while living in glass houses.

I can think of several major life affecting issues that one media outlet or another has blown in very recent memory, let alone speculation over some gadget that has no REAL bearing on life. Unfortunately such speculation can and in this case did have an affect on share holders bottom line, which IS a potentially life altering in terms of balance sheets, short calls and retirement savings.

Like Yahoo's Ron Paul coverage after the first Republican Debate when he was left off their online poll, then added but disparaged, then they had to retract that as well.

The NY Times cited by the author routinely gets things wrong or ignores glaring facts of a story, in fact EVERY newspaper does, there's always a section called CORRECTIONS, but just like with this case, no one really remembers the correction or retration, but rather the first report.

Where I do agree however, is that things that are unconfirmed should at least carry a disclaimer on the TOP of the story / post, stating something to the effect that, While this is 'hot off the presses' it's unconfrimed and might be a hoax at this time. To not do so IS in fact irresponsible journalism.

Anyway, that's my .02

Later,
Rev

Infowars - because there IS a war on for you mind
Search terms Truthaction Third Stage
May 21, 2007

0 replies

You prove my post - thank you.
I used the phrase voultarily in my post, and mysteriously, now an Editor note appears at the end of the article which reads and I quote:

"(Editor's note: OpenDNS is funded in part by Minor Ventures, a venture capital firm founded by Halsey Minor, who founded News.com parent company CNET Networks.) "

So, your entire post proved both the points you otherwise set out to refute, so I thank you for the validation. =)

Rev
April 23, 2007

0 replies

Horrible Idea!
I'm agahst that CNET is promoting this idea as something good.

First and foremost, this isn't anything new, duh hello it's called a HOST LIST, I can make any keyword I want on a given machine = any web site I want.

But in normal thinking, substituting or redirecting is considered a browser attack by most malware detection/prevention programs, because, DUH it is an attack of sorts.

Many viruses infect your system such that if you try to say go to www.symantec.com or www.mcafee.com etc etc you get sent to some other site.

You are advocating the mass adoption voluntarily of a system that undermines the Internet wide DNS system, without which, the internet could never have acheived the level of mass penetration and adoption that it has.

It causes me to wonder what kind of cross marketing agreement OpenDNS might have with CNET NEWS if not directly, through one of the other tenuous partnerships with major conglomerats.

Later,
Rev

Take the RED pill
infowars.com
because there IS a war on for your mind.
April 23, 2007

2 replies

Unleash the truth
Unleash the truth and it will run like a Leopard.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=786048453686176230&q
April 13, 2007

0 replies

Another useless startup?
Am I the only one who scratches their head every time one of these 'startups' shows up on the sceene to save the day, and go, huh, you can already do that without the cost and overhead of thier product?

Most Enterprise class organization are already using Group Policies to enforce a baseline of minimum standards for certain PC settings, and can limit or remove completely the end client's ability to modify the settings controlled by Group Policies on their local pc, beit desktop or laptop.

Or am I really missing something here?

If so, I admit...I don't get it!

Rev
September 15, 2006

2 replies

More information: Newsletters; CNET Mobile; Customer Help Center; RSS; CNET Widgets; About CNET