Classic Software's community profile

1 to 10 of 15

My comments

It is you, ddesy, who are wrong
I have been involved in the PC business for the last fifteen years. There was a time this was for ego. Not any more. The hacker enthusiasts are still out there but they have been out numbered by criminals, mostly from eastern Europe. This is huge money and if you think I'm wrong spend a little time with people who face this for a living. Visit any PC forum and they are inundated by spyware and viruses of all types. This is all about money. Nothing else....
January 19, 2007

0 replies

WRONG
Please read my earlier comment. As long as IE has active-x, it will remain less secure than FireFox.

As someone who removes Spyware from other peoples PC's, IE remains more vulnerable to Spyware.
February 10, 2006

1 reply

Silly boy
The main reason Firefox is more secure than IE is that IE uses Active-X. That is the most insecure part of the browser. This allows drive-by installation of spyware on your system.

Firefox, especially if you run the NOSCRIPT extension is pretty much impervious to these types of threats.

We will see what IE7 has to offer, but unless they drop active X they are going to remain vulnerable.

There is no question, for the average user, FireFox is safer than IE.
February 10, 2006

0 replies

Let's Get Real
As U was reading the article, Firefox informed of the update, downloaded the update, installed the update, re-started the browser. My only complaint was it didn't bring me back to the page I was reading.

FireFox is faster than IE, fixes any issues faster than IE, is safer than IE. As long as IE is built on Active-X, Firefox will always be safer. If you install the NoScript Extension, than it's 1000% safer than IE.

I am not surprised there are issues with FireFox or any software program. It's how they are addressed and the fixes deployed that makes a difference. and by the way FireFox Rocks.....
February 2, 2006

0 replies

Really??
You said:
"Are Darwinists so afraid of a REAL search for truth -- that is, letting people CONSIDER alternatives to the believes they've chose for themselves"

The operative word is truth. Evolution is truth. It has been tested by scientific and reproducable methods. Can evolution explain everything, no it can't. But that does not make it equall to Intelligent Design, a theory for which there is not a scintilla of scientific evidence.
December 20, 2005

0 replies

You must be kidding
The Hebrews were the first people of the bible, they spoke Hebrew, and Moses, a Hebrew, wrote the Bible. There were NO Greeks to right the original 5 books of Moses the Jews call the Torah. The original language was Hebrew.
If you accept the theory of the literal truth of the Bible, you HAVE TO ACCEPT IT WAS WRITTEN IN HEBREW.
November 11, 2005

0 replies

Time to brush up on your hebrew
You said:
"Hi, My delving into Genesis in the Hebrew generated an expression that appeared to have parallel expression going on, that could imply not only the origin of general creation, yet also even child birth and rearing and possibly even a 'resurrection' process. Likely to imply that at the heart of all the diversity there is a commonality of enErging that drives it all into existence. One also might note that the word commonly translated as day, is more closely related to the english word era, or something similar that implies a period of time with as common characteristic about it."
You are just wrong. The word for day in Hebrew is YOM and it means day right up to the present day.
The Jewish holidays are called
YOM Kippur (DAY of Attonement)
YOM Hazikaron (Day of Remembrance)

It does not mean era of attonement. Please go back and brush up on your Hebrew or get a new teacher. A little more delving is in order.
November 11, 2005

0 replies

You know NOTHING about the bible.
The original bible was written in HEBREW, not Greek. And then you go and say it's the literal truth, but a day means something different in God's eyes. But a week is a week reckoned to occur every seven days.
You can't have it both ways. If the bible is the literal truth than a day is a day and week is a week.
Buy the way the word in the bible for day in the ORIGINAL Hebrew is YOM and it means day the same as it did 5766 years ago when it was being described.

If you are not knowledgeable enough about the bible, you should cease to comment on it.
November 11, 2005

0 replies

Wow
To believe in the literal creation is silly. Which creation are you speaking about. Are you speaking about:
Bereshit bara elohim ayt hashamayim viayt haaretz.
When god began to create the heaven and earth. Genesis 1:1
or
Ayleh tolidot hashamayim viayt haaretz etc
Such is the story of heaven and earth when they were created.
Genesis 2:4

And by the way unless you are reading the bible in the original Hebrew, you are reading an interpretation. It is not meant to be taken literally. It's such an immature understanding of GOD and scripture.

There is so much proof of evolution it is mind boggling.
You say "The actual original texts (not copies) were used in compiling the bible and those texts are still readable. The texts did not change over time and if you look at history texts that are not the bible you will notice that they only help to prove that the bible is accurate and true."
This displays an amazing lack of knowledge. The bible was totally an oral tradition. A more realistic explanation can be found here:
http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_tora.htm

Believing evolution is true does not make religious belief false. Nor does it make people of faith fools. There is a place to teach creation and that is in religious school. There is also a place to teach evolution and that is in science class.
November 11, 2005

0 replies

More information: Newsletters; CNET Mobile; Customer Help Center; RSS; CNET Widgets; About CNET