• Home
• Reviews
• News
• Downloads
• CNET TV

About me

My posting summary

1 to 1 of 1

My comments

• The problem lies in how (a) Google values Wikipedia ...
  [rhetorical verse/haiku sequence]
  Once upon a time /"human-edited" meant "good." / NOTE: "Directories."
  
  Humans can't keep up. / Not a volunteer army. / Too much data flow.
  
  Microsoft tested / Looksmart directory links ... / Lowered search quality.
  
  Even ODP ... / Google "did the math" with that. / Too much junk data.)
  
  BUT lately observe / Google - Wikipedia / How links are valued.
  
  That too's a mistake. / There's not enough editors / to "guarantee" facts.
  
  Only the obsessed / will "eagerly" "protect truth" / Who else has the time?
  
  AS LONG AS GOOGLE / remembers "human failings" / there is no problem.
  
  THE BOTTOM LINE: / Wikipedia's human. / Google should not be.
  
  {smile}BOKE / www.boke.com

  December 9, 2005

  0 replies