November 13, 2009 11:07 AM PST

Vega Tablet is real, has Android 2.0 and a Webcam

by Scott Stein
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 22 comments
Share

The Vega tablet: killer Android device?

(Credit: ICD)

As if Apple and Microsoft didn't already make it clear (editor's note: by Apple, we mean the ever-pervasive rumors of their upcoming "slate"), 2010 looks like the Year of the Tablet. First viewed sitting on a table of an Nvidia executive, the Vega tablet will try to beat Apple's tablet (if the rumors are true), Microsoft's in-process Courier concept, and the semievaporated Crunchpad to the punch.

ICD, the manufacturer of the Vega, has confirmed the existence of the tablet as a real product, whose details will be more fully revealed at CES. Vega...Vegas...it seems appropriate.

The sleek black pad will come in sizes of 7, 11, and 15 inches, and will run Android OS 2.0. Its internal processor will be a Nvidia Tegra, which means that HD and even gaming-level graphics should indeed be possible.

The Vega tablet from the back.

(Credit: ICD)

Other specs, according to ICD:

  • Resistive touch-screen display
  • 1,366x768 screen (for the 15.6-inch model)
  • 512 DDR/512 NAND storage
  • 1.3-megapixel Webcam
  • MicroSD card slot
  • Bluetooth 2.1
  • 802.11 b/g Wi-Fi
  • USB 2.0 port/s
  • 2g/3g data accessible
  • Magnetic docking
  • Accelerometer
  • Dual microphones

We like that dock.

(Credit: ICD)

The fact that it has magnetic docking and an accelerometer sounds promising, and ICD also claims video chat, gaming, and "on-demand Web TV" as features.

The dock, in the photos, seems to allow the Vega to be stood up like a photo frame, which is a nice touch. The most disappointing aspect: ICD's fact sheet claims 4 hours of battery life. We also would have preferred a capacitive touch display, like the iPhone's, as opposed to a resistive.

What's the cost? Well, we'll find out that soon enough.

Scott Stein, a New York Jets fan and CNET senior associate editor, has written about tech, entertainment, video games, and viral culture for outlets including Laptop, Wired, Maxim, Esquire Online, Asylum, and Men's Journal. He also appears on the Digital City podcast. In his spare time, you might see him performing improv in New York City (when he's not being a dad).
Recent posts from Android Atlas
FCC approves Nexus One with T-Mobile 3G
Google phone looks 'supersharp'
Strong demand for Motorola Milestone in U.K.
Sprint HTC Hero, Samsung Moment to get Android 2.0 in 2010
T-Mobile adds second Android app purchase option
You got a Motorola Droid. Now what?
Verizon pushes out update for Droid Eris
Leaked lineup tips HTCs Android hand for 2010
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (22 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by geejunie November 13, 2009 11:29 AM PST
Only 512 DDR?? That's kind of backwards. Needs more RAM before I'll consider it. Also, 1.3 is weak for a webcam. Sounds like a concept model from 2005. Update it before release, please!
Reply to this comment
by rfelgueiras November 13, 2009 12:03 PM PST
I'm sure they put in entry-level parts for the concept stage knowing newer components can be swapped/tested closer to an official announcement.

I'm wondering if a mobile phone's OS is right for a product like this. Even though I can be an apple fanboy, I think so far Microsoft's proposed software solution is is the best suited for a tablet format. it needs to be more like a notebook/planner than what a streamlined mobile os should be, and that includes the iPhone OS.

just my two cents.
Reply to this comment
by Slick1of2 November 13, 2009 1:03 PM PST
I need someone to tell me why anyone should buy a tablet. Because I really don't get it. It's not ergonomic and the guts really are not that hardcore.
Reply to this comment
by rfelgueiras November 13, 2009 2:25 PM PST
Why does anyone need "hardcore" guts on the go? Like seriously, what needs to run at desktop power on the go? What I, and many other creative types NEED, is a digital sketch book. Microsoft's prototype seems PERFECT for that type of thing. I don't need a laptop with me - it's a pain and not intuitive enough to just whip out and doodle, write, sketch, collect ideas... whatever. Something like the iPod is too small, a laptop is too cumbersome. there needs to be a digital version of a moleskine so that when I get back to the office/home I can toss those sketches or whatever to my machine and really develop ideas that hit me while away from my workstation. I don't want to take my workstation with me, and I think that has been the major mistake of most of these mobile concoctions. I really don't know anyone who's in any field of work that needs to be able to work out concepts on the go to develop later who wouldn't kill for this. More free-flow corralling ideas that I feel modern desktop software (and mobile hardware) isn't acceptable for. No, not for everyone... but way more than you would think.
by ZeppelinMaker November 17, 2009 6:59 AM PST
I second rfelgueiras comment. I want an electronic sketchpad to get my doodle-urges out.
Any other abilities would be gravy for me.
by QA_Tester November 17, 2009 9:30 AM PST
I suspect this is positioned to be non-existing Apple tablet like device.

@ rfelgueiras

Also 15.6" model is probably aimed primarily at people who want to use it at home and take advantage of any apps from Android App Store.
by rnaoncfixd November 17, 2009 10:15 AM PST
@ rfelgueiras, ZeppelinMaker

Sketchbook + Scanner @ home is a much cheaper process.

I mean, I hear ya. It's very cumbersome using a tablet and laptop on the go. But pencil/pen to paper is a much more satisfying experience. Wacom does a decent job at replicating the paper feel with some of their tablets, but overall I don't feel that a tablet would be a great experience overall.

By the way, you will need some serious guts in there to run some Adobe products at a rate that you are used to.
by carbine68 November 17, 2009 10:30 AM PST
I agree I don't see the point of a tablet, look at the UMPC's and they have failed pretty bad and its almost the same concept.

I guess if the os is right maybe but the last thing i want is to lug another thing around.

My Cell phone does everything I need while I am on the go, even though my laptop sits in my front seat of my car I only get it out if I have to start coding, work in Photoshop, or start putting something together in Open Office.

I am sure Apple will make this a must have item, they are a marketing machine that can't be stopped right now.

I would rather put my money into Apple stock than to buy a tablet from Apple.

Why?
Because I really don't need a tablet, its an expense not an asset! The paper will make me money before some tablet ever would.
by gfallar November 17, 2009 10:56 AM PST
We have a web based electronic medical records system, tablets are perfect (running in portrait mode and utilizing a pen) for doctors and medical assistants to use during patient visits.
by Renegade Knight November 17, 2009 11:24 AM PST
Media Gizmo. Touch interface allows things that can't be done on a regular screen. If you need to you can always prop it up and plug in a cheap keyboard and mouse. Thus more versatiliyt.
by Succulence November 17, 2009 2:22 PM PST
Will those indicating the need for having a "digital moleskin" so that they can "doodle" and "sketch" while on the go please explain why that is better then having an actual moleskin? What are you sketching and doodling that you'd rather have in digital form? I'm an audio engineer so the sonic equivalent is digital recording which is very convenient, but mostly because it's non-linear, has unlimited tracks, and is inexpensive. None of these factors however seem pertinent to the world of digital doodling. My question, then, is what is better sketched or doodled digitally then on a physical notepad with a pencil and eraser?
by nauj_solrac November 16, 2009 2:54 PM PST
Yeah. why do people need a hardcore gaming on a tablet.

The tablet is for people on the go and I don't see why they need such a powerful tablet which will only raise the cost in the end.

If you want something more powerful, just get a smaller notebook then.
Reply to this comment
by rumorcontrol09 November 17, 2009 4:31 AM PST
What exactly has Apple done to make it clear that 2010 would be the year of the tablet? I've not heard anything from Apple at all. I've only heard speculation from news organizations like yours.
Reply to this comment
by lil-yankee November 17, 2009 7:49 AM PST
I agree with rumorcontrol09.
Apple has not even hinted formally (only on patents) that they intent doing anything netbook or tablet.
They said if im not mistaking, that they dont know how to make something cheap to compete in that market and make a profit, so yeah cnet stop spreading lies please.....
Reply to this comment
by iconoclast04 November 17, 2009 8:01 AM PST
"We also would have preferred a capacitive touch display, like the iPhone's, as opposed to a resistive. "

Unless there are special styluses that can write on capacitive screens, I don't know that it makes sense to go with this technology for a tablet. More so than with a smartphone, one would presumably want to sketch and write with a stylus on a tablet, as opposed to just finger pressing.
Reply to this comment
by big.mouth November 17, 2009 9:39 AM PST
There are plenty of styluses available for capacitive touchscreens.
by kruzilla2001 November 17, 2009 8:30 AM PST
I'm on a tablet pc right now and use it for inking my drawings or writing. The fact that I can do pretty much everything I do on my desktop is just gravy (except it can't handle gaming). I'm guessing they're thinking that a lot of people will want to be able to do everything on one computer, like gaming, rather than buy 2 machines. I'm hoping they'll make these new tablets more artist-friendly. Right now they're mainly aimed towards health and business markets. We're kind of an afterthought imo. If this thing was more accurate I'd draw directly on it instead of just inking. Plus, a 15" screen would be sweet. I'd have to drop a lot of dough to get the Wacom Cintiq. My 2 cents.
Reply to this comment
by friscoG November 17, 2009 8:35 AM PST
Looks great, however a slim laptop seems more practical.
Reply to this comment
by big.mouth November 17, 2009 9:38 AM PST
Resistive touchscreen = FAIL. Seriously, tablet makers, it's not that hard. Why can't you deliver the product people actually want?
Reply to this comment
by DarwinsGod November 17, 2009 10:09 AM PST
NO BUILT IN SPEAKERS??? WIERD DONT YA THINK? thought that would be an obvious addition...
Reply to this comment
by rfelgueiras November 17, 2009 2:44 PM PST
Some of you are over thinking it, some of you are under thinking it. Interesting.

it's not about practicality, at least, not in the way you think of it. I don't want it running Photoshop, not necessarily. I have my desktop for that. I don't want it running Windows, or OS X for that matter. it's not a Computer Desktop so it shouldn't function that way, but more like a grouping of readable and writeable books (sketchbook, address book, maps, internet resources, photo album). Not to sound too "avent garde" but you're all thinking of what computing is like now (either mobile phone or desktop) instead of the more fluid way we interact with non-computing tasks (note-taking, sketching, swatch collection, the list goes on). this could be one of those devices that changes our interaction and therefore our application of electronics in our day-to-day. We as electronics users adapt to a platform instead of the other way around. I see the tablet as an opportunity to change that.

@ rnaoncfixd - it's not about cheap (though i am by no means not concerned with price) but more about process. Keeping everything digital in one place, without having old sketchbooks you can't part with. Something that can be digitally backed up with no worry about bringing the wrong one or the wrong marker colours...

@ carbine68 - Tablets up till now have failed because all they did was replace the mouse with w stylus and take out the keyboard, in some cases they didn't even do that. But the biggest mistake was keeping the desktop "experience" for the tablet. Current OS interfaces are meant to be seated some where, That idea needs to be re-addressed.

@ friscoG - maybe for the way you are thinking of using a computer, not the way I am. For the record, I am not looking for a "Bigger iPod Touch". Instead, I'm looking for a tablet that replaces my sketchbook, address book, email on the go, browser, and test editor, plus the ability to "toss" all of those things to my main machine to develop them. Microsoft's courier project looks really promising (and I'm an admitted apple fan boy)and I'm sure if something like that came out, people would be looking at a tablet in a whole new light.
Reply to this comment
by koma2191 November 17, 2009 4:00 PM PST
Resistive screen = fail
Reply to this comment
(22 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Android Atlas

News, analysis and tips on the Google Android operating system and devices. Got a tip? Want to contact us? E-mail androidatlas@cbs.com. Follow us on Twitter.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Android Atlas topics