October 21, 2009 10:26 AM PDT

Will Verizon really open its Droid?

by Kent German
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 20 comments

Open up the Droid

Verizon's recent iPhone attack ad featuring its upcoming Droid smartphone has the tech world buzzing, and iPhone fans are taking notice. The iPhone Blog even posted a point-by-point reply to the commercial's claims. While most of its arguments center on minutia (see the bit about the keyboard) the iPhone Blog makes one very good point concerning open development.

"Really, Verizon, with your history, you want to play that card?" Rene Ritchie wrote. "Android is an about face for you, not a two-face. We'll wait and see on this one." Indeed, we will have to wait and see. Though the Google Android OS is all about being open, Verizon's has a long history of locking down Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and GPS on its phone. What's more, it imposed a frustrating and poorly designed standardized menu interface across its handsets.

On the upside, Verizon has been drifting away from its control-freak past over the past year, but Android marks a distinct change. If Verizon is to deliver Android as it's intended to be, then it will allow for real user customization of the device and not customization as the carrier wants you to have it. Come on, Verizon, be the "dumb pipe" that customers want.

Kent German is a senior editor for cell phone reviews at CNET. When he's not testing the newest handsets on the market, he's blogging about cell phone news for Crave. In his On Call column, he answers reader questions and gives his take on the rapidly changing mobile industry. E-mail Kent.
Recent posts from Android Atlas
T-Mobile expands app picks on Android Market
Maturing Android Market hits 20,000 applications
Inside the Google phone: A 'snappy' chip
FCC approves Nexus One with T-Mobile 3G
Google ponders risky Android solo act
Google phone looks 'supersharp'
Strong demand for Motorola Milestone in U.K.
Sprint HTC Hero, Samsung Moment to get Android 2.0 in 2010
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (20 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Der_Amerikaner October 21, 2009 10:53 AM PDT
Bravo Mr. German on this article, well written!
Consumers in the US have long been badly served by properiety and closed systems, such firms consider the bottom line first, and cutomer last.
Reply to this comment
by ptrunxla October 21, 2009 5:20 PM PDT
Really??? These firms look at the bottom line first. That's called business Einstein.
by CorporateRaider October 22, 2009 9:13 AM PDT
@ptrunxla
Well actually that's not "business", Business generally has consideration for the long term relationship with the primary revenue source. Sacrificing the customer over short term improvements in stock prices called "improving the bonus of senior management", and has recently got the attention of government.

Der_Amerikaner has ir right - Real Business is about the relationship not the transaction.
by Nkyru October 21, 2009 12:11 PM PDT
lol the iphone has had it's run.... i mean, the way it is now. but... this is apple we're talking about. and, not for nuthin, they've consistently designed some of the best, original products we've seen in the last decade. this Droid phone sounds awsome. i would get one myself, but...why bother? i'm pretty sure that when apple released the iphone, they knew everyone would copy them, and began designing the "next" killer device. so, i think i'll wait for that one, because all these devices are still catching up to the iphone, but it's the iphone2 or wutever they decide to call it, that will really raise the bar again. :)
Reply to this comment
by charlotteguy October 21, 2009 12:49 PM PDT
Nkyru, let's not really go there at all with Apple. First off, Apple did this to themselves...they signed exclusivity rights with one of the nation's least favored and ragged networks. AT&T can not, and will not, ever be able to achieve superiority over the other major [now digital/CDMA] carriers out there, especially went it comes to 3G, or for next year, 4G/LTE or WiMAX...I've said this before, APPLE didn't invent the PDA, they just made a trendy device and had some great marketing behind it. But when it comes to functionality, let's face it, some of those old true Nextel/iDEN devices could do things the original iPhone couldn't (ie, picture message / connect to exchange). Apple's days are numbered, and they shot themselves in the foot by ruining whatever talks it was in with Verizon to get a device on a CDMA carrier. For now, iphones are nifty devices, but their competitors are gaining momentum and strength with more widely-accepted and versatile...let's just see how much their market share grows in 2010. I think Verizon hit the nail on the head with their advertising, though somewhat hypocritical, yes (ie Open Development), but it?s awesome to see a jab at those stupid iPhones for once :-)
Reply to this comment
by charlotteguy October 21, 2009 12:49 PM PDT
Nkyru, let's not really go there at all with Apple. First off, Apple did this to themselves...they signed exclusivity rights with one of the nation's least favored and ragged networks. AT&T can not, and will not, ever be able to achieve superiority over the other major [now digital/CDMA] carriers out there, especially went it comes to 3G, or for next year, 4G/LTE or WiMAX...I've said this before, APPLE didn't invent the PDA, they just made a trendy device and had some great marketing behind it. But when it comes to functionality, let's face it, some of those old true Nextel/iDEN devices could do things the original iPhone couldn't (ie, picture message / connect to exchange). Apple's days are numbered, and they shot themselves in the foot by ruining whatever talks it was in with Verizon to get a device on a CDMA carrier. For now, iphones are nifty devices, but their competitors are gaining momentum and strength with more widely-accepted and versatile...let's just see how much their market share grows in 2010. I think Verizon hit the nail on the head with their advertising, though somewhat hypocritical, yes (ie Open Development), but it?s awesome to see a jab at those stupid iPhones for once :-) MATT CAUTHEN, CHARLOTTE
Reply to this comment
by rel1215 October 21, 2009 11:54 PM PDT
great comment the day after apple reported possibly the sickest quarter any company has reported since the economy tanked.....a blowout of those proportions is amazing in a solid economy, but for a company to do that selling premium products at premium price levels in this economy???? I think consumers have spoken up and they say you are wrong. i also love how you bash iphone capability in a thread about android.....if you haven't noticed, its not really a fully baked OS and isn't exactly smooth (to say the least) when it comes to all levels of functioning. and last......verizon is touting a device that is running INSANELY BETA firmware....it hasn't even been released to devs yet, and their touting it as the most cliche thing in the world.....an iphone killer.

i'm not saying apple is perfect either.....4.0 better be an revolutionary step for the OS rather than an evolutionary step....and i think its about time for them to debut a "pro" level device alongside a refreshed 3gs.....and personally, there is nothing about this device to me that holds a candle to the hd2

gotta love how all these companies that were left for dead (palm, mot) just have to post a video or two and leak a couple specs to the public and suddenly they are the heir apparent/chosen one to be the "iphone killer".....wow doesn't seem like a bunch of people desperately wanting the iphone to fail bestowing us with their knee-jerk reactions to every newly announced phone with better than average specs.....and the icing on the cake with this situation is that suddenly verizon....big read....likened to the old iron curtain is now the new beacon of hope for openness and customization?!?!?! whats next? Is Obama gonna be given the nobel peace prize for maintaining one war while initiating a surge in another??? oh.....wait.....
by frogpondmedia October 21, 2009 1:25 PM PDT
I think this really is an "about face" at Verizon.

For one, they have already opened their networks to a wide variety of cellular modems and other devices, which had previously not been allowed. Maybe money talks.. cellular right now it the ideal way to maintain universal connectivity, at least below certain bandwidth limits. The old Verizon would cede this market to other companies.

It's also a very good time to do this. Verizon has had a miserable collection of Smart Phones... Blackberries (fine if you're in their target market, no point for most of the "pocket computer" crowd that the iPhone has addressed) and old, known-to-be-EOLed Treos. Every other carrier at this very moment has a much better Smart Phone solution for many of us.

So, money again.. they adapt, or they fail. They're big enough to take a leadership role in this... the only reason I care, personally, is that Verizon is the only 3G that's reliable at my house. If network wasn't an issue, I'd probably have a T-Mobile Android phone already. They could have treated this new thing just like Sprint and T-Mobile did.. hey, lookie here, new Smart Phone.

But where's the fun in that... the Droid really does look like the best iPhone competitor yet. I'm already pretty much sold... unless some evil is revealed in the next two weeks, I'll be in line as soon as possible. I'm totally in the target market for the iPhone, I'm surrounded by them, even my wife keeps saying "why don't you just get the damn iPhone". But I'm also not in the target market, simply because I understand the problems with Apple's closed market, and believe I know better than Steve Jobs what I'd like my networked, pocket computer (which we all still call "phone", though traditional voice telephony is only a tiny subset of the real functions here) should be running, in terms of software.

I also see Android as doing for this market what MS-DOS and Windows did for the PC market, only better. For one, it's actually a decent foundation.. not perfect, but getting better. It's free, which the hardware manufacturers love, given the crazy competition in the handset business. They can customize it (the Droid is a "Google Experience" phone, so it's done the Google way, but there's no requirement for this) their way... Apple doesn't allow any customization: user, app, or network provider, on the iPhone.

So yeah.. I've been on Verizon for three years, I've been furious about all the evil they've done, taking features out of "feature" phones like the RAZR. But even at that, they didn't really have a way of crippling my old Treo, other than pushing against certain features.. like no WiFi. The feature set of the Droid tells me they aren't pulling this crap now. I will absolutely give them one more chance, just based on the quality of their network. One more chance.
Reply to this comment
by iluvH1N1 October 21, 2009 6:34 PM PDT
I completely agree, I have been a verizon customer for years, attributable to their network and I am sorely disappointed in their phones. I will probably not renew my two year contract because none of the current phones are worth being locked into a crappy contract. This new phone MIGHT keep me on as a verizon customer but only if they really come through this time for real.
by AppleSuxLeo October 21, 2009 1:32 PM PDT
The Android phones are going to hit Apple just as Windows 3.1-95 did.
The Mac actually had great market share before Windows was improved.
Same will hold true for Android devices.
BoyGeniusReport has unveiled the upcoming Verizon entry-level Android device, the "Calgary," which will use the MOTOBLUR interface launched with the T-Mobile Cliq.

The leaked pictures show a 3MP camera, 3.5mm headphone jack, GPS, Wi-Fi, a microSD slot, and a full slide out QWERTY keypad.

BGR says the the "OS builds running on it are incredibly smooth as well as responsive."
Reply to this comment
by teezecrost October 21, 2009 1:40 PM PDT
I have to wonder what Verizon will cripple, and if a Canadian carrier be any better. Any word on when the Droid is supposed to appear in Canada, anyone?
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo October 21, 2009 2:21 PM PDT
Kent German has become the Android FUD point man LOL
Too bad all the social networking sites are going crazy over Android/Droid.
Reply to this comment
by JDubbs115 October 21, 2009 3:10 PM PDT
In regards to the title of this article, I honestly don't see what the big deal is. Verizon has always left the Windows Mobile Os'es alone, and WinMo's about as open as they get; you can do whatever/ get whatever you want on it, and no one could care less.

And I really don't feel that the Android marketplace will make this a special circumstance either, considering that VZW left the Windows Marketplace for Mobile alone when it came out, doesn't touch Blackberry App World, and is letting Samsung run their own widget store whenever the Omnia II feels like coming out (I stopped waiting for that phone and got an Imagio instead, and I have no regrets, lol). And if anyone's been paying attention to VZW lately, you'll see that they've been really pushing customization lately with their own revamped app store for their feature phones. And now that it seems their days of removing Wi-Fi and crippling GPS seem to be over, I really don't think there's anything to be worried about.
Reply to this comment
by celticbrewer October 22, 2009 5:08 AM PDT
Let's hope so JD. I've been with verizon for almost a decade and always get a cheap phone that makes calls/texts. I wouldn't buy a smartphone without WiFi. Pretty much anywhere I go has WiFi these days, so why should I buy a crippled device or rack up my data allowance?

Verizon has always tried to suck every penny from you. ie Why do I have to pay for ringtones even though my phone supported MP3 ringtones (but the feature was disabled by VZW )?

Let's hope they turn a leaf. Charge me for using your network, but let me do what I want with my phone, dammit!
by T1H5TA3 October 21, 2009 10:22 PM PDT
based on the system dump.... yhey! wheres that old rainbow apple logo from the 80's?

looks like vzw did the right thing...
Reply to this comment
by inntoon October 22, 2009 5:57 AM PDT
While I hope things like GPS are truly left accessible to developers, the magic key will likely be Flash and the Open Screen project. While many think flash is just a way to create annoying ads, its power is clear in Apple's decision to ban it from the iPhone. With Android 2.0 embracing a new, leaner flash 10.1 plug-in that's optimized for mobile (ARM) processors, it will be possible to develop applications and in-browser experiences that can pretty much do anything. If verizon doesn't make good on its promise to facilitate open development, the flash community will embrace other Android phones that do. It's a matter of time before any such impediments to open-development are no longer a competitive advantage.

That will also be true for Apple on the iPhone, though I suspect they'll hang on to their proprietary iTunes and App stores as long as possible. It will be a while before open development looks better on a spreadsheet than a locked and loyal customer base.

As a flash developer, I've been waiting for a long time to have a phone I can show my work on and develop content for. Flash on Android sounds like it will make that happen, and phones that dilute that promise will ultimately develop a reputation as phones that can't run the Android apps that others will.

Since Google apparently had a big hand in developing the Droid phone, I'd be disappointed if delivering on one of Android's core values isn't part of the deal.
Reply to this comment
by October 22, 2009 7:25 AM PDT
Verizon always has been and probably always will be run by dinosaurs. I've suffered through GPS crippling and Wi-Fi removal for so long that I will "believe it when I see it" regarding Verizon opening up and allowing any kind of freedom. Just as I'd like to see the iphone on other networks, I'd also like to see the Droid on other networks. Absolute power corrupts, absolutely.
Reply to this comment
by mknop October 22, 2009 7:38 AM PDT
I currently have a 3G, and have been an AT&T customer since the old AT&T, before they became Cingular. However, if the Droid lives up to what I?ve read about it so far; AT&T/Apple would have to do something pretty dramatic to prevent a switch to Verizon/Droid.
Reply to this comment
by cnetpre October 22, 2009 8:45 AM PDT
Verizon and AT&T are considered the top 2 network carriers in the U.S. However, Verizon (Droid) has the best network coverage and best service compared to AT&T (iPhone). Though the iPhone 3Gs and Droid processors run at 600MHz, the Droid carries a bigger punch with a much better camera (5 megapixels), a microSD slot, a removable battery, true multitasking OS, and a real keyboard!

iPhone's hardware is falling behind the times while the Droid and other smartphones (e.g. Palm Pre) are coming out with hardware that provides better experience and value. It's clear that the iPhone will soon sink in the midst of better devices if they don't release yet another model (3Gsx?). It will be an uphill battle for iPhone as the 3Gs had just been released 4 months ago; rushing a new model into the market will only promote a higher percentage of bugs and flaws.

Meanwhile, 3rd party developers are already cloning their apps across the Android (droid) and webOS (palm pre) operating systems to gain better visibility and added revenue.
Reply to this comment
by JoinWowMobile October 22, 2009 1:08 PM PDT
Android yes but for how much??? I left Verizon for WOW Mobile. I was paying $179.00 per month because I needed unlimited Internet. WOW Mobile a new online store offers Android 1.6 on the MyTouch for only $79.95. It?s mobile voip and no data transfer cap! Checkout http://www.joinwowmobile.net it?s awesome IMHO!
Reply to this comment
(20 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

About Android Atlas

News, analysis and tips on the Google Android operating system and devices. Got a tip? Want to contact us? E-mail androidatlas@cbs.com. Follow us on Twitter.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Android Atlas topics