October 20, 2009 6:47 PM PDT

An Android phone by Google: I think not

by Kent German
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 28 comments

Will Google get involved?

Just when you thought the Google Android news couldn't get any stranger, Ashok Kumar, an analyst at Northeast securities, told InternetNews.com and TheStreet.com today that Google itself is planning to release a handset with the operating system.

Details are sketchy, but according to Kumar the device will be unlocked and will be available directly through retailers. Though unlocked phones typically are more expensive than carrier-branded phones, they are also free of any carrier restrictions. Google hasn't commented on the rumor, but I'm taking this one with a healthy dose of speculation.

First off, I can't understand what Google would gain by going head to head with manufacturers and carriers that have embraced the OS. Six manufacturers and three carriers now have devices either in stores or on the way so it's clear that the cell phone world is getting involved. Google already has a role by supplying the OS, which is the unifying feature on the various hardware designs.

Since it isn't a hardware company Google would need someone to make the phone. So who would that be? Though I could see a manufacturer getting onboard just to sell more phones, it would also expect to have some role in the marketing. It's called the T-Mobile MyTouch 3G, but you know its made by HTC.

While an unlocked handset would fulfill Android's open promise to the most degree, you still have to get it on a carrier eventually. And in doing so you'll need to accept the limitations of a carrier's network. Some services will still be out of reach no matter what.

Finally, Google also wouldn't gain that much control over an open device. Google Search and apps already power Android phones so I can't imagine what additional Google fun an unlocked phone would offer. Similarly, Android users already have a lot of control over what they do with their phones. Would an unlocked model give them that much more freedom? Not really...we're not talking about a jailbroken iPhone.

I very well could be wrong about all of this, but for now I'm calling foul. I'll be eagerly awaiting further news, and if it comes I'll report it here. So what do you think? Would Google sell its own Android phone?

Kent German is a senior editor for cell phone reviews at CNET. When he's not testing the newest handsets on the market, he's blogging about cell phone news for Crave. In his On Call column, he answers reader questions and gives his take on the rapidly changing mobile industry. E-mail Kent.
Recent posts from Android Atlas
Android team embraces developers
Android 2.1 coming to Sprint HTC Hero, Samsung Moment
T-Mobile expands app picks on Android Market
Maturing Android Market hits 20,000 applications
Inside the Google phone: A 'snappy' chip
FCC approves Nexus One with T-Mobile 3G
Google ponders risky Android solo act
Google phone looks 'supersharp'
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (28 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Truthseekernz October 20, 2009 7:23 PM PDT
Think of an unlocked Google phone as being like the public option in the health debate. If no telco will give you want you want and all want to lock you up on THEIR terms....you have an out that lets Joe Consumer keep the big telcos 'honest' and competitive.....instead of restrictive and exclusive.

It makes sense to everyone but the vested interests who benefit from monopoly and choking off the market.
Reply to this comment
by Random_Walk October 21, 2009 6:45 AM PDT
I'm guessing that if you bring your own phone to a carrier, they will either refuse to let you use it (Verizon), or will charge you a very hefty monthly fee for using it.
by Paul_Christie October 21, 2009 12:26 PM PDT
@eseirra1
"I guess the phone would have to be marketed to the homies in the OC..."

I don't think there are any "homies" in the OC. Probably in the LBC?
by jaguar717 October 21, 2009 1:00 PM PDT
That came a bit out of left field. Google isn't a public "option" because it actually has to cover its costs instead of hemorrhaging other people's money until everyone else is out of business.

Back to the serious topic, I don't know why Google would go this route since they aren't a hardware maker! Whatever they come out with will take more resources and likely be inferior to what an established hardware maker with its learning curve and capital costs behind it could do.

Also, few people buy full-price unlocked phones here because the plan subsidies save you so much money most people consider them a better alternative. Sure you have a few exceptions, but it's not the bulk of the market. What they ought to be doing is partnering with various hardware makers to get their software on multiple phones for multiple carriers. Then they have access to the entire market, and can get a huge number of people using their products (and in turn their other services).
by jskrenes October 21, 2009 8:51 PM PDT
If it's unlocked, it will almost certainly be GSM. You can't use GSM on Verizon, that's cell phone tech 101, before we even deal with Verizon's restrictiveness. In another year or two when 4G hits and VZW goes with SIMS, then we'll see what devices get access to VZW's network.
by joshuaallenperry October 20, 2009 8:01 PM PDT
Who says the phone needs to have a carrier? What about an android-powered VOIP phone that communicated directly to Google Voice over WiFi?
Reply to this comment
by sanenazok October 20, 2009 8:21 PM PDT
Yes Wifi, all the convenience of carrying on conversations at hotspots, ONLY.
by AppleSuxLeo October 20, 2009 8:56 PM PDT
Makes perfect sense. All the McDonald's have free wifi in the OC.
Many people would like an unlocked phone.
by PulSamsara October 21, 2009 7:09 AM PDT
Well... how far are we along with the 'white space' options... remember the battles fought last year ? Google fought that battle (and got what it wanted) -
It seems to me that Google might just be able to go carrier free if need be.

I'd say that they would do this carefully - lest they **** off come Android adopting carriers.
by esierra1 October 21, 2009 12:09 PM PDT
"Makes perfect sense. All the McDonald's have free wifi in the OC."

I guess the phone would have to be marketed to the homies in the OC...
by writteininwaters October 21, 2009 12:32 PM PDT
Hell yeah! We can all cruise down to Mickey D's to make our calls. It's great for MD and the android loving community... and the OC. Plus, the OC is being protected and looked after by Stab Man, so I can feel safe at which ever McDonald's I choose to call from!!
by lesbihonest17 October 20, 2009 8:55 PM PDT
i bet the rumors arent true. it makes no sense. plus everyone is jumping on the android bandwagon so theyre already gaining alot.
Reply to this comment
by atish505 October 21, 2009 4:34 AM PDT
I will buy it. I am always for unlocked phones and the freedom that comes with it. The whole world outside USA buys unlocked phones.
Reply to this comment
by wkfung108 October 21, 2009 12:33 PM PDT
Not Japan.
by HcMAX October 21, 2009 5:21 AM PDT
Hello,

Have you thought about a google phone with WiMAX embedded and so It can work with VoIP calls like Mr. joshuaallenperry has said?

Having a Google Phone with WiMAX embedded would be the perfect scenario to explore all the capabilities of the OS and what the web have to offer us, and to explore and develop new fields regarding mobile experience....an all new range of Value-added services....

I believe that's the future!!!!!

Thanks,

Hugo Cunha
Reply to this comment
by jssox1 October 21, 2009 7:57 AM PDT
I agree. I am a (poor) college student, and I would say 95% of my day is spent in range of WiFi. This would be especially good for those people who use a pay as you go phone, because they are already 'value-conscience." Even better this would be a perfect phone for a child. My neices are always at school (wifi available), or at a friends (wifi available.) So this phone would basically be a hardware sale for google, but then free VOIP after (with advertising somehow.)
by QA_Tester October 21, 2009 2:56 PM PDT
Except Wimax isn't offered without carrier
by droidweb October 21, 2009 6:04 AM PDT
This rumor might fortell the coming of a second Android Developer Device. Its about time they released a new one. Hopefully this will have at least a 1GHZ processor...
Reply to this comment
by davet444 October 21, 2009 7:16 AM PDT
I think you might be missing the point - with the latest agreements with Verizon and the alleged agreement that they will open up their systems this makes total sense. Verizon clearly has the edge with regards to the network and it appears that the network is becoming the deciding factor. If you are google or Verizon what do you have to fear. Google gets a phone that can work with multiple networks, Verizon has a clear advantage in network coverage and a true 4g coming on line before anyone else and the other guys all have the ability to steal customers. I think it is a win win. It has become increasingly difficult to hold a consumer hostage because of a phone or handset. Times are a changing.
Reply to this comment
by Shanest October 21, 2009 11:02 AM PDT
Whats the purpose of an unlocked phone if Verizon is the only one that uses CDMA? Carrier freedom is worthless unless a GSM or a la' ATT ,T-mobile etc.....
Reply to this comment
by cw_ October 21, 2009 1:22 PM PDT
I would buy an unlocked GSM android phone in a heartbeat.
Reply to this comment
by QA_Tester October 21, 2009 2:58 PM PDT
So buy one: http://www.google.com/products?hl=en&rlz=1R2ADRA_enUS345&q=unlocked%20android%20phone&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wf
by AppleSuxLeo October 21, 2009 1:36 PM PDT
Kent German is trying to create FUD in regards to Android.
Too bad all the social networking sites are working in Android`s favor LOL
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo October 21, 2009 4:15 PM PDT
Right...consumer choice is a bad idea NOT !
Reply to this comment
by cegm October 21, 2009 4:17 PM PDT
Unlocking the google phone will allow non-US customers to get it. So quite a big market could open up.

Personally I live in South America and order stuff from the US regularly. Not phones, till now. Thank you Google for thinking globally.
Reply to this comment
by October 21, 2009 9:16 PM PDT
lol - I live in the US and buy my phones from Europe or Asia because we never get the best phones here until they are 3 generations old (if ever).

The problem with the US is unless a carrier picks up the phone it almost certainly will not work on ATT 3g and definitely won't work on T-Mo 3g. Would be nice to get some choice for unlocked phones here that would work on 3g or better.
by jwan83 October 22, 2009 2:18 AM PDT
Could be the Creative Zii Egg they're talking about. At the moment it's just an SDK and it doesn't have phone functionality as yet. But who's to say it wouldn't be added in there, since it can do everything else and is open to developers?
Reply to this comment
by jim.schwarz December 16, 2009 6:35 AM PST
Palm has been doing this for a while. I have a Treo 680 unlocked using my AT&T sim card. I have various reasons, but I like not having a contract. I can switch to a pay as you go sim from either AT&T or T-Mobile if I want. I would be interested in an unlocked Droid, Moto has a GSM droid type coming out in Europe, I figure they or someone will offer it in this country on-line. Obviously non of the telco's will sell an unlocked phone. So google is about the only one who can.
Reply to this comment
(28 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Android Atlas

News, analysis and tips on the Google Android operating system and devices. Got a tip? Want to contact us? E-mail androidatlas@cbs.com. Follow us on Twitter.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Android Atlas topics