• On MovieTome: See the villain of IRON MAN 2!
November 16, 2009 12:12 PM PST

Buzz Out Loud Podcast 1107: Vote for us or the chicken gets it

by Tom Merritt
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 5 comments

The Podcast awards are on, and we're up against TWiT again, so we had to get drastic. We will no longer protect your chicken from Dokken if you don't vote for us. So there. Also Psystar is no longer protected from Apple, and Modern Warfare 2 is no longer available in Russia. Whew. So much less availability these days.

Listen now: Download today's podcast



Subscribe with iTunes (audio)
Subscribe with iTunes (video)
Subscribe with RSS (audio)
Subscribe with RSS (video)

EPISODE 1107

UPDATE: Apple wins important round In Psystar copyright case
http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20091115-703736.html
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10397876-37.html

Apple relents on Mad artist’s caricature app
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10397895-93.html

Russia bans Modern Warfare 2, recalls all copies of game
http://www.destructoid.com/russia-bans-modern-warfare-2-recalls-all-copies-of-game-155211.phtml

Zune to launch outside US
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/76f98ae8-d205-11de-a0f0-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1

Windows Mobile loses nearly a third of market share
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/communications/0,1000000085,39877964,00.htm

Is Sezmi a cable TV killer?
http://technologizer.com/2009/11/16/sezmi/

About half in U.S. would pay for online news, study finds
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/16/business/media/16paywall.html
http://paidcontent.org/article/419-one-size-doesnt-fit-all-consumers-want-choice-on-pricing-delivery-of-co/

URL shorteners suck less, thanks to the Internet Archive and 301Works
http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/13/url-shorteners-suck.html

New dating sites match people through DNA tests
http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/11/15/1734238/New-Dating-Sites-Match-People-Through-DNA-Tests

Shuttle to haul 27,000 pounds of spare parts
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/16/science/space/16shuttle.html

VOICE MAIL
Ted from Berkeley on a Gizmo workaround to avoid paying for Skype

Mike from Irvine describes a poorly designed cookie implementation

E-MAIL
Sudo not violating Microsoft patent – Ill be brief since I have written in about patent hate before so Ill just get to the specifics of this instance. I did a quick read of the claims, and I will admit i am not a programmer but i have some experience in it from highschool and college, but my reading of the claims sounds like they are linking different admin accounts using some underlying algorythm and showing the linked accounts in a graphic interface for the user. This does not sound like the way the sudo command is implemented and the Microsoft patent would not prevent people from using the psuedo command. Ill attach the patent language for you to read as i feel grocklaw is a biased observer. Despite the on going patent hate, Love the show.

Tim the Patent Examiner

PS: Yes I am biased too.

**********

Hey Buzzcrew,

Today I was listening to episode 1106 and I wanted to comment on the discussion of modified xbox 360 consoles. It was mentioned that the only way to detect a banned console is to connect it to the internet. This is not entirely true. You can pop off the front face (which is totally legit to do) and check if the warranty sticker is still intact. This holographic sticker near the controller USB ports cannot be left intact when performing the mod to allow backups to run. Just because it’s broken doesn’t necessarily means the console is banned, BUT if it is intact, there is no possible way the console is banned.

On craigslist or eBay you could demand a picture of that sticker before considering a purchase, at least adding some confidence to the sale,

Love the show!
-Chris

**********

Hey Buzz Crew,
Just wanted to point out that Buzz Out Loud is nominated for The People’s Choice Podcast Awards for Best Video Podcast so:
DON’T LET REVISION3 BEAT YOU!
Tell everyone to vote!

http://podcastawards.com/
(Vote 1 time daily through November 30th! -Jason)

I am not affilliated with the podcast awards, by the way.
Somewhat ironically, I discovered that you were on the list when I clicked a link on Revision3’s site to vote for them.
But when I saw Buzz Out Loud as an option, I knew I had betrayed you CNET! I immediately voted for Buzz Out Loud!
Love da show-

Andrew Faulds

Recent posts from Buzz Out Loud Podcast
Buzz Out Loud Podcast 1114: Dorks will break your heart
Buzz Out Loud Podcast 1113: There's no Moore's law for chemistry
Buzz Out Loud Podcast 1112: Rupert Murdoch battles infinity
Buzz Out Loud Podcast 1111: Facebook is depressing
Buzz Out Loud Podcast 1110: Apple Tablet is the unicorn of tech
Buzz Out Loud Podcast 1109: In the future we'll all be cats
Buzz Out Loud Podcast 1108: Tracker pulling
Buzz Out Loud Podcast 1107: Vote for us or the chicken gets it
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by purplebox November 16, 2009 12:39 PM PST
I guess the chicken gets it then, because my conscience says not to vote. These kinds of "contests" are rigged beyond belief. By the podcast hosts themselves, no less, rallying their listeners to vote.

I love the show. I love Leo too. There's no need for this make-believe adversity. So I won't vote.
Reply to this comment
by brandonsadkins November 16, 2009 1:22 PM PST
I agree. There is no need for these awards. It is a popularity contest. If another podcast has 2x the listeners, but sucks, it is still going to win because it has more people to vote.

These awards are no measure of the quality of the podcasts involved. They are a measure of the quantity of listeners, regardless of the quality.
by eytanzweig November 16, 2009 7:00 PM PST
How is the contest "rigged" by the hosts? They're all playing on a level playing field. They all get to rally their listeners. The ones who do that best win. As brandonsadkins points out in his reply, it's a popularity contest. No more. That's how they work.

But that's no reason not to vote. Votes = popularity. Popularity = advertisers. Advertisers = free content for us. Votes in these contests help keep the podcasts we listen to free. Maybe it's not a huge factor, but it definitely helps.
by brandonsadkins November 18, 2009 8:08 PM PST
I agree that as far as advertising is concerned, it could be a good thing for us to vote. To set the record straight, I don't agree that it is "rigged". I just think it is unnecessary, and a bad idea overall. I choose not to support the idea, by not voting. However, I have no issue with those who are voting and realize that popularity is what it's all about. I just don't like that fact. I don't want it to be about popularity. I want it to be about quality. Strictly quality.
by faloutboi November 16, 2009 2:48 PM PST
Hi Buzz Team,

For the people who have not played the game, (please skip this paragraph if you don't want spoilers) let me briefly describe the Airport scene. You are an CIA agent undercover and in your briefing your are told that what you are about to do will "cost" more then your used to but it is worth the price. Then the the game play starts with getting off and elevator with 3 other TERRORISTS (not Russian military) which then proceed to move through the airport killing indiscriminately. You have control over your weapon(shoot or not to shoot) but know that as an undercover agent, you must try and fit in.

I think Infinity Ward(IF) knew what they were doing when they put in the Airport scene. I think the last thing you are meant to seek out in this mission is fun. It is about the horror and cruelty and has been represented in other forms of media like books and movies. The first-person element is what people(including myself) find disturbing about this instance. It is not the last of the disturbing scene in the game that personalizes human conflict and pulls no punches. By doing this I believe that IW has sent a message lost in other war games about real war. I'm left with the same feeling I had after watching "Saving Private Ryan" both wishing I'd never experiences the event and empathetic of what happens to to people who went through it. If they were more explicit and given a description of the events, it would have taken away from the shock. They decided to favor art and story telling and apologize afterwards... Or this could have been all for publicity in which case they are DBs.
Reply to this comment
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Subscribe to the Buzz Out Loud podcast

Subscribe to the audio podcast via RSS
Subscribe to the video podcast via RSS

Subscribe to the audio podcast via iTunes
Subscribe to the video podcast via iTunes

advertisement

About Buzz Out Loud Podcast

Buzz Out Loud features Tom Merritt, producer Jason Howell, and a rotating roundtable of CNET's top tech experts reviewing the day's tech news. Each episode, five times a week, the crew analyzes, interprets, and argues about what all this technology means and what it's doing to us. Fans can join in the show by calling 1-800-616-2638, e-mailing at buzz@cnet.com, or commenting on the blog.


Add this feed to your online news reader

Buzz Out Loud Podcast topics

More on Buzz Out Loud
Buzz Out Loud Lounge forum
Buzz Out Loud on CNET Live
Buzz Out Loud old episodes archive
Buzz Town Wiki
Buzz Out Loud ringtones
Submit your favorite 2009 moments
flickr Wikipedia ”YouTube” Jaiku Twitter Plurk Facebook Myspace
Meet the Buzz Out Loud hosts
Tom Merritt Tom Merritt appears on CNET TV, specializing in help and how-to and the ever popular Top 5 lists. He also co-hosts CNET's The Real Deal podcast. See profile
Jason Howell Jason Howell can often be found producing Buzz Out Loud from the audio studios at CNET, updating XML feeds from the comfort of his cubicle, and saying "uh-oh" from time to time. See profile
Live Updates
Podroll
When you're not listening to Buzz Out Loud, here's some other great podcasts to try.
This WEEK in TECH
Tekzilla
Diggnation
Galacticast
Ask a Ninja
Tom's The Real Deal
Natali's Loaded
Molly and Jason's Gadgettes
Molly's Buzz Report video
CNET News Daily Podcast
Other CNET podcasts