August 3, 2009 8:16 AM PDT

Ask U.S. Chief Technology Officer Aneesh Chopra a question on Buzz Out Loud

by Tom Merritt
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 33 comments

We're very pleased to have federal CTO Aneesh Chopra joining us on Buzz Out Loud this Tuesday. We'll start our live show a half hour early--1 p.m. ET, 10 a.m. PT--with a half-hour talk with Mr. Chopra.

We'll ask him a bunch of the obvious stuff, like what does the CTO do? We'll talk about Net Neutrality, open source, etc. But what do you want to ask him?

Post your questions in the comments below. We'll choose a selection of them for the show.

Recent posts from Buzz Out Loud Podcast
Buzz Out Loud Podcast 1130: Verizon is Robbing the Hood
Buzz Out Loud Podcast 1129: Is Google finally too big?
Buzz Out Loud Podcast 1128: Should Google make its own Netbook?
Buzz Out Loud Podcast 1127: Microsoft and EU browser roulette begins
Buzz Out Loud Podcast 1126: Microsoft plucks Plurk
Buzz Out Loud Podcast 1125: Exclusive report on the Google Nexus One
Buzz Out Loud Podcast 1124: Alexandria, the greatest hard-drive crash
Buzz Out Loud Podcast 1123: Honey, what's this charge for penetration testing?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (33 Comments)
by DodgeHowell August 3, 2009 8:24 AM PDT
In the past, or at least when Technology jobs started booming, I was actually discouraged from obtaining any formal education in technology and just jumping into the job market. Given today's competition and job market, what value do you think formal education such as degrees such as associates, bachelors, masters, and doctorates hold in today's job market and how do you think they compare against vendor certifications and/or on-the-job training?
Reply to this comment
by calyryan August 3, 2009 10:12 PM PDT
I would like to second this question as I am planning on going back to school at the end of this month for an education in technology.
by robstak August 3, 2009 8:46 AM PDT
This is a great opportunity. Thank you Mr. Chopra for the opportunity.

Questions:

1) Last week, a college student was ordered to pay $675,000 to the RIAA for illegally downloading 30 songs; that kind of debt could seriously impact someone's life. Is this an instance of 'the punishment fitting the crime'? Is there a role for government in and regulating such rulings (something akin to tort reform) in the future?

2) You have previously mentioned health IT as one of your top priorities. As a doctor, the effective rolling out of a cohesive EMR system is something we have all been keeping an eye on as the utter lack of cohesion even within hospitals is readily apparent. To that effect, do you plan on supporting the distribution of a single EMR system, country-wide? If so, would you recommend the current VA LIS system or would you support a private effort such as Google's? Would such integration be mandatory or voluntary? If mandated, what kind of timeline seems feasible?

Thank you for this opportunity.

Sincerely,
Karl Robstad, MD ('Dr. Karl')
Reply to this comment
by robstak August 3, 2009 9:33 AM PDT
EDIT:

To add to the second question, would a national EMR system give patients full, unfettered access to their medical records, or would there still be an element of professional privilege available?

Sorry for the add-on!
-Dr. K
by shmody August 4, 2009 4:52 AM PDT
I really look forward to his answer to #2... Nice doc, nice ;)
by kenwiesner August 3, 2009 9:00 AM PDT
On the first episode of This Week in Google on the TWiT Network the panel discussed the App Store and the recent rejection of the Google Voice applications. Jeff Jarvis said "I wonder if this is really the beginning of the net neutrality fight. The question is, is the iPhone a phone or is it the web. If it's merely a phone the network traditionally has control over their phone end to end and that is that. If the iPhone has some consumer promise of bringing us the web then how neutral must they be about the applications that go there?" (TWiG1 Time marker: 12:56 http://www.twit.tv/twig1)

While I understand that the FCC is currently investigating wireless open access (RM-11361) and handset exclusivity (RM-11497) and that it may not be appropriate to comment on those investigations, my question to Mr. Chopra is how does the Obama administration view Net Neutrality with regard to the mobile product and service space in general and do you believe that it is the role of government agencies such as the FCC, FTC, etc. to regulate mobile application stores like the App Store to ensure equal footing for developers and to promote consumer choice? Thank you for your response!
Reply to this comment
by RogueTess August 3, 2009 9:06 AM PDT
If not via your office, is there another way to spearhead moving the US once and for all and universally into the metric system?

Also, open choice for consumers among cell phone carriers: please make that happen! Thank you.
Reply to this comment
by mdkarazim August 8, 2009 11:21 AM PDT
Amen?the current "voluntary" system of conversion achieves exactly the opposite effect given that virtually all government forms require the use of non-metric measurement units. Most recently I noticed this with the passport application. The same seems to go along with localization settings on computers. Will A4 become the universal letter standard throughout North America as well as the rest of the world?
by MPaulGriffith August 3, 2009 9:12 AM PDT
I'm really looking forward to this episode!

How do you feel about federal preemption in terms of tech law? Right now, each state and DC have their own data security laws. Firms engaged in interstate commerce then have to comply with each state's unique regulations, but cyber crimes are often across state boundaries, involve entities spread across state lines, and are often perpetrated by people in foreign countries. Doesn't one federal law make the most sense for these kinds of crimes?

Michael Griffith
Washington, DC
Reply to this comment
by skyman375 August 3, 2009 9:20 AM PDT
Thank you for providing the opportunity to pose questions to Mr. Chopra.

1) What is the Administrations guidance on balancing the emerging capabilities of social networking, and the security constraints? Some issues seem to be easy, such as banning the use of peer-to-peer file sharing on Government computer. Others, such as restricting the use of Twitter, would remove what is becoming an important tool for policy makers to communicate directly to people. Given that using Twitter, Facebook and puts some security and operational readiness concerns into non-government hands, how seriously can the Government afford to move services into depending on social networking as a major form of communication?

2)How do you balance the Green IT initiative and other policies that direct a 4 year hardware refresh cycle with the Microsoft 3 year product cycle (since the Government is overwhelmingly reliant on Microsoft?). At what point does the Government (FDCC?) determine that "this version of Office is good enough" to bypass the next? Will the Government lead breaking out of a productivity suite driven exchange system for documents/presentations?

3) As the military increasingly is forced to restrict access (operational security concerns, IA concerns, and bandwidth concerns) do you think that the NIPR net will become more restrictive at it's root levels?
Reply to this comment
by shmody August 3, 2009 10:28 AM PDT
great, great questions!
by shmody August 3, 2009 9:23 AM PDT
Internet infrastructure:
1) Before consumers write angry letters to their representatives or senators in D.C. about the lack of internet infrastructure progress, what underated, long-pole, or bottle-neck issues should they consider first to temper and refine their argument and proposed solution?

Game play:
2) Actual tennis or Wii Tennis?

Supreme court judgments:
3) What information technology related issues do you feel are going to hit the high court in the next couple years?

Very best,
Shalin Mody
Dallas, TX
Reply to this comment
by robstak August 3, 2009 9:35 AM PDT
#2... and thats why we all love you shalin. win. lol.
by smkatz August 3, 2009 9:51 AM PDT
Will your Broadband plans affect me in a city that already has non-fiber (cable and dsl) and Uverse options? Or is your roll-out primarily in rural areas? What speeds are you aiming for, and why? I find that I can share a 10mbps connection with my entire condo (10 people so far-- we have an agreement for this) -- with very good results.

--Sam
Reply to this comment
by RedMaij August 3, 2009 10:14 AM PDT
I'd like to know why there's no legal standard for what "high speed," "broadband," etc internet is. I've stayed in hotels that advertise high-speed internet for an extra charge, and I'd be lucky to get 20KB/s down, and 3000+ latency. Should be false-advertising, but since there is no legal standard, as long as they deliver ANYTHING above 5KB/s dial-up, it's hard to argue.
Reply to this comment
by shmody August 3, 2009 10:38 AM PDT
Urban-Rural Digital Divide:
What are the goals to address the Urban-Rural digital divide? If none have been defined at this time, when can we expect them to be set? What committee(s) will be addressing this issue?

Thanks for your time and insight!

Very best,
Shalin Mody
Dallas, TX
Reply to this comment
by adampasz August 3, 2009 11:45 AM PDT
In my lifetime, regardless of where I've lived, I've *never* had a choice of Cable TV provider. (I've always lived in urban areas so Dish has not been an option.)

Why are cable companies not regulated for their anti-competitive, monopolistic practices?
Reply to this comment
by PhilAlban August 3, 2009 12:07 PM PDT
My question is more of a general one, but I wanted to know whether or not stimulus funds were earmarked for infrastucture improvements, and exactly what improvements were on the CTO's priority list. Having grown up in a rural area, but enjoyed the advantages of urban life, I am really interested in seeing infrastructure improvements expand connectivity to the whole country. Not just urban areas. Broadband connectivity, under whatever definition "broadband" is determined to be - throughout rural America. As long as the choices are no longer incredibly slow dial-up, or incredibly expensive satellite (sp?). Thanks.
Reply to this comment
by shmody August 3, 2009 12:20 PM PDT
Air Traffic Control Update:
Is there a way for your office to support and accelerate a needed update to the nation's air traffic control system for security, throughput, and even energy efficiency (as a result of "file and fly")? If so, what can citizens do to encourage that?

Thanks for your time and insight!

Very best,
Shalin Mody
Dallas, TX
Reply to this comment
by stigmattaman August 3, 2009 12:48 PM PDT
With the sluggishness of government -- some of which is needed to ensure oversight -- how quickly can someone in your position implement new technologies and programs and have them be effective? How does this time frame impact your decision-making, and how would you compare it to your previous experiences in both the public and private sectors?

Thanks for consideration.
Reply to this comment
by goodusernamestaken August 3, 2009 2:01 PM PDT
The cash for clunkers site did not perform well (slow when accessed, often not working).
I understand that it was contracted out.
What do you plan to do in future to ensure that government program sites don't get surprised from high traffic? And what was the cause of the "beaucratic problems"?
Reply to this comment
by extofer August 3, 2009 2:17 PM PDT
What if you ask Aneesh if with his post as CTO, can he get involved with the SEC in issues like Apple's rejection of Google Voice
Reply to this comment
by adachan August 3, 2009 3:30 PM PDT
I am using Time Warner Cable as my cable TV provider. Recently TWC has removed almost all the channels from NTSC (analog) cable. They say they are now digital and provide the channels through a rented cable box or via cable cards. These boxes or cards MUST be rented from TWC. Furthermore, TWC charges a fee for the cable guide in the cable box AND a fee for what they call mirroring the channels, since the boxes have 2 tuners in them. I have asked, and it seems impossible to not receive the guide information, even though this is freely available online. Furthermore, my TV and my computer both have QAM tuners in them. These QAM tuners are perfectly able to tune digital channels without the use of a rented box. TWC does indeed provide digital channels over QAM, however the channels are largely limited to NBC, CBS, FOX, and ABC, the same channels that are available on analog, however the HD versions are also available on QAM. If I can tune digital channels without the need for a cable box, why are all the channels that used to be available on analog cable now only available with a proprietary rented box. It seems that by only providing channels using the boxes, it is guaranteeing some income through forcing customers to rent boxes they do not need. How can this be legal? Furthermore is it also legal to set the CGMS-A flag to copy never on every show on every channel 24 hours per day?
Reply to this comment
by DCEgovExaminer August 3, 2009 5:49 PM PDT
1) What would you do to ensure that technology-enabled services offered by the Government to citizens (such as electronic payment of taxes) are of the highest possible quality ? In the private sector, for instance, a company that does not offer efficient, timely and quality services goes out of business, whereas the Government does not have the power of the markets keeping it in line. Can services offered by government ever be as good as those offered by the private sector ?
2) Use of technology in government is often interpreted narrowly to mean use of technology for services to citizens. Not as many countries think of technology as a tool to improve governance. Good governance can include elements such as democracy, democratic processes and institutions, human rights, the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary, effective, just and honest government , openness, participation/inclusiveness, accountability, effectiveness and coherence. How would you use technology in a wider sense to improve governance ?
-Tanya Gupta, Washington DC
Reply to this comment
by cybergorilla August 3, 2009 6:02 PM PDT
Is there any serious consideration to online voting?
Reply to this comment
by tieforces August 3, 2009 8:28 PM PDT
What is up with the disclaimer on the cash for clunkers website having me accept my computer as federal government property?
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (33 Comments)
Subscribe to the Buzz Out Loud podcast

Subscribe to the audio podcast via RSS
Subscribe to the video podcast via RSS

Subscribe to the audio podcast via iTunes
Subscribe to the video podcast via iTunes

advertisement

About Buzz Out Loud Podcast

Buzz Out Loud features Tom Merritt, producer Jason Howell, and a rotating roundtable of CNET's top tech experts reviewing the day's tech news. Each episode, five times a week, the crew analyzes, interprets, and argues about what all this technology means and what it's doing to us. Fans can join in the show by calling 1-800-616-2638, e-mailing at buzz@cnet.com, or commenting on the blog.


Add this feed to your online news reader

Buzz Out Loud Podcast topics

More on Buzz Out Loud
Buzz Out Loud Lounge forum
Buzz Out Loud on CNET Live
Buzz Out Loud old episodes archive
Buzz Town Wiki
Buzz Out Loud ringtones
Submit your favorite 2009 moments
flickr Wikipedia ”YouTube” Jaiku Twitter Plurk Facebook Myspace
Meet the Buzz Out Loud hosts
Tom Merritt Tom Merritt appears on CNET TV, specializing in help and how-to and the ever popular Top 5 lists. He also co-hosts CNET's The Real Deal podcast. See profile
Jason Howell Jason Howell can often be found producing Buzz Out Loud from the audio studios at CNET, updating XML feeds from the comfort of his cubicle, and saying "uh-oh" from time to time. See profile
Live Updates
Podroll
When you're not listening to Buzz Out Loud, here's some other great podcasts to try.
This WEEK in TECH
Tekzilla
Diggnation
Galacticast
Ask a Ninja
Tom's The Real Deal
Natali's Loaded
Molly and Jason's Gadgettes
Molly's Buzz Report video
CNET News Daily Podcast
Other CNET podcasts