• On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
June 18, 2009 9:59 AM PDT

On Call: Enough with the 'iPhone killer'

by Kent German

No, it's not the best phone ever.

(Credit: Corinne Schulze/CNET)

I cringe every time I hear the phrase "iPhone killer." And in a month like this, when we've reviewed the Palm Pre, the iPhone 3G S, and the next Google Android phone that is expected to land at T-Mobile, I've heard it way too many times.

My biggest issue with the phrase is not that's it's overused--though that's part of it--it's that it implies that the iPhone needs to be killed. Calling the latest touch-screen phone an "iPhone killer" automatically elevates the iPhone to a place that it doesn't deserve. Yes, it's an excellent, innovative device that does many things well, but it's not the best cell phone on the planet. And with the possible exception of its multitouch Web browser, it's not the ultimate pinnacle of cell phone development.

We need only to look at the iPhone's 3G's latest rivals to know that other devices can pose serious competition. No, they're not perfect either, but they're certainly innovative in their own way. And despite what some Apple fans may argue, they're not going anywhere.

Palm's innovative new WebOS is like nothing we've seen before. The Pre multitasks beautifully, its Synergy feature and notifications system are incomparable, and its multitouch browser almost beats the iPhone at its own game. We didn't love the Pre's hardware, but Palm will be coming out with more WebOS devices. Who knows what round two will bring?

Android handsets like the Google Ion/HTC Magic offer a fantastic interface, great integration with Google services, and a truly user-customizable experience. What's more, since Android will run on more than one device, consumers will have a real choice of hardware. Of course, that last point depends on Google and handset manufacturers actually introducing more Android devices. I'm impatiently awaiting the follow-up T-Mobile G1.

There will never be a "world's greatest phone," though people will find the best phone for their needs. We also should remember that competition and choice are good things. We should not desire a world where there is only one kind of cell phone, much like we shouldn't desire to drive one kind of car, drink one kind of soda, or wear one brand of shoes. There is plenty of room in this world for multiple brands of phones, whether they be flashy, multimedia handsets like the iPhone or simple candy bar models that just makes calls.

So, please lay off the "iPhone killer." It's not fair, it's not accurate and it's just not right.

Kent German is a senior editor for cell phone reviews at CNET. When he's not testing the newest handsets on the market, he's blogging about cell phone news for Crave. In his On Call column, he answers reader questions and gives his take on the rapidly changing mobile industry. E-mail Kent.
Recent posts from Dialed In Podcast
The 411: Storage limits and more on data plans
Verizon's LG Chocolate Touch is nice but nothing new
Droid does multitouch, Milestone does it better
Sprint to also offer RIM BlackBerry Curve 8530
Verizon reveals the Casio G'zOne Brigade
Samsung Mythic and Flight on sale November 8
Verizon's November feast
Samsung's Convoy goes rugged
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (39 Comments)
by Mac User Too June 18, 2009 10:31 AM PDT
You started this: what is the 'best phone ever'?
Reply to this comment
by iroq321 June 18, 2009 10:42 AM PDT
i think the point of this article is to point out that ther is no "best phone ever." it will differ from person to person depending on their needs/desires. what you may think is the best phone in the world, another person can think is the worst.
i agree with the author in that the iphone has been put on this pedestal as if it were perfect when in fact, it's far from it (no multi-task, video recording, MMS, to name a few.) is the iphone innovative? yes. perfect? no. is any other phone out the perfect? doubt it.
by slapppy June 18, 2009 10:33 AM PDT
Good point. Since the Palm Pre failed to attract new users. It was a failure of a launch.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=a5k1RDLAr8cI
Reply to this comment
by Paodi June 18, 2009 10:34 AM PDT
So Kent...what phone do you carry? If you had the choice of any phone available (worldwide markets included), what would it be?
Reply to this comment
by Paul_Christie June 19, 2009 11:30 AM PDT
@Paodi
Why would it matter what phone he would carry? And to contradict what I think what you are trying to say; even if he has an iPhone, I don't think it would be because what you as well as everybody else thinks--that the iPhone is somehow the 'best phone ever'. I mean, Kent German is a Senior Editor for cell phone reviews, not some blind Apple fanboy.
by qhuetastique June 19, 2009 3:10 PM PDT
Would it be so hilarious if Kent German didn't have a personal cellphone. Or still had the same model for the past 10 years.
by ritchotte June 18, 2009 10:53 AM PDT
Wow. I almost chocked on my cupcake when I read the headline. Finally someone was going to call out the illogical haters...and someone from CNET no less! Ohh how wrong I was, or right, I guess. The idea that a 2 year old phone produced by a computer company has COMPLETELY changed the smart phone market would constantly be the target of the next "Killer" always seemed laughable to me. But it's laughable because the iPhone is entirely successful and not because, as the author so remarkably states, "Calling the latest touch-screen phone an "iPhone killer" automatically elevates the iPhone to a place that it doesn't deserve". Right. And the next Kia will certainly be a BMW "Killer.
Reply to this comment
by phlubbub June 18, 2009 11:55 AM PDT
I agree with the first comment. What is the best phone out there? I've used just about everything available now, from Nokia Nseries and Eseries phones to HTC TouchFLO 3D phones to Samsung, LG and Sony Ericsson's best. I've used every BlackBerry on the market, including the Bold, Storm and Curve 8900. I've used imports, fashion phones and concept devices. The iPhone is the best phone out there. It isn't the best at every single thing it does, but as a total package, there is no phone that is more pleasing to use.
Reply to this comment
by Eludium-Q36 June 19, 2009 11:23 AM PDT
Let me introduce you to the Samsung Omnia series and the HTC Touch Pro2, on Sprint/Vzn nets. And as you say, they're not the best at every single feature, but they do so much so well that they're just as attractive to us CDMA types.
by wacko_javo June 18, 2009 12:16 PM PDT
I remember Motorola devices were automatically raised to such status. After the RAZR craze, we would hear the "killer" thing about other devices such as the Q. I feel silly about ever considering such labels more important than they were. I know this will pass too, so I just ignore it.
Reply to this comment
by Slick1of2 June 18, 2009 3:05 PM PDT
Thank you so very much!
I am going to be sending this article to so many people today.
Reply to this comment
by polarbebe June 18, 2009 10:32 PM PDT
The Pre is not an iPhone-killer, because it killed itself already.

Why are developers going to spend resources to make apps for a tiny platform base (around 100,000-200,000 Pre users) during a recession when they can focus on Blackberry (best selling smartphone), Android (over 20 Android phones coming out this year), iPhone (over 40 million installed base) or Windows Mobile (tens of millions of users).

A smartphone is not just internet, calender and a clock. I don?t think people are lining up for Linux over Mac OS or Vista, the reason why Mac OS and Vista are the dominant operating systems is because of computer programs (Linux is less supported).

Nobody is going to buy a smartphone with no apps, its like a computer without programs.

The Pre is dying a slow death (the platform will be dead in 1-2 years guaranteed... unless its bought by Microsoft, Dell or some other company).
Reply to this comment
by DarkHawke June 19, 2009 8:51 AM PDT
Actually, I would think what's going to kill the Pre with the dev community is that the SDK has yet to be widely released. That seems wholly nonsensical, since one of the major selling points of the iPhone is the app support (despite the unwarranted and capricious discrimination practiced at the App Store). The time to have wide and FREE distribution of the Pre SDK was three months ago. Even if they did so now, there's a WHOLE bunch of catch-up ball they need to play to compete in that arena with the iPhone.
by seven7dust June 19, 2009 1:38 PM PDT
the pre wont die a slow nor will any other viable smartphone
and believe me the Pre is a pretty good phone, it may not be the best but it's up there
standard phones or dumb phones like will die a slow death
by jskrenes June 19, 2009 7:20 PM PDT
'dumb' phones might die a slow death, but it will be extremely slow, say a generation or two. Believe it or not, there are still billions of people around the world who do not have a cell phone. We will soon see a huge proliferation of non smartphones for the developing world, phones that are basic, make calls and texts, maybe have a camera, and can hold a charge for months on end, or be recharged with hand cranks, solar power, etc., so that those without cell phones can make a cheap and easy adaptation of the technology. Plus there will always be people who want basic service.
by rafalek2000 June 19, 2009 10:30 AM PDT
Kent said it best, competition is vital in the growth of the industry. Without it, we would still be stuck on the First Gen iPhone. Remember how slow and incomplete the original was?
I am a Mac guy, but I do not own an iphone. The device falls short, at least up to this point. The Palm does offer an alternative, but it also has its drawbacks. And so doe the Android.
I do no comprehend on how consumers get up in arms over the "iPhone Killer" phrase. When I hear the term, I get excited, but not because I hate the iphone, but because there is competition on the horizon. A new phone usually makes competitors think, react, and adjust. And that is what we are really after, even if we dont come out and say it.
Reply to this comment
by Staszek June 19, 2009 3:39 PM PDT
While the 3gs is great, how is the first gen iphone bad, besides 3g and GPS it could do every single thing the 3g could do (up until this past Wednesday when 3.0 came out) while wasting a lot less battery life.
by rafalek2000 June 19, 2009 11:29 PM PDT
I never said it was bad. I just said it was incomplete, But lets not forget the expensive price tag that came with it.
by Eludium-Q36 June 19, 2009 11:29 AM PDT
Wow, and I thought Cnet was a subsidiary of Apple. Did you clear this column with mgmt, Kent ?! No, that's great, I too tire of this overused phrase. Though I'm a CDMA type I admire what the iPn has accomplished, and like Steve Jobs said at its introduction in '07, it had a 5yr jump on all others in technology, though it's only taken two years for most to catch up with the major features like accelerometers, gyros, and flip scrolling. But that's the key phrase "catch up", the iPn still leads and all others are playing catch up, but we're all benefitting because the HTC Touch Pro2 is an awesome pdaphone that lacks little from the iPn 3gs.
Reply to this comment
by benr79 June 27, 2009 10:50 PM PDT
Thats one way to look at it. The other way is that the IPhone is still struggling to catch up to the feature set of the Razr and the Instinct
by cardenas817 June 19, 2009 11:50 AM PDT
THANK YOU KENT!!!!
i've been tired of it too...
Reply to this comment
by Big Jake 72 June 19, 2009 11:50 AM PDT
I think part of the whole "iphone killer" issue stems from media, including CNET, constantly reporting on a phone that really only represents a small portion of the overall market. From looking at CNET.com the past few days you'd think the iphone was only phone worthy of attention.

The following stories occupy much of CNET's homepage today, 8 out of 16 articles!

Live blog: iPhone 3G S launch day, 364 days and counting to iPhone 4G, iPhone OS 3.0: What else is new?, iPhone OS 3.0 plugs 46 security bugs, On Call: Enough with the 'iPhone killer', An overview of iPod updates in OS 3.0, Hands-on with the Apple iPhone 3G S and the remotely related "Original iPod Touch worth the upgrade?"

Unbelievable!!

I can see why some would want an "iphone killer" so at least we can read about something else!
Reply to this comment
by rafalek2000 June 19, 2009 12:33 PM PDT
Big Jake,
I totally agree. I lost some respect for CNET, when Cooley did an entire video just on "unboxing" of the original iPhone. How is unboxing newsworthy?
by seven7dust June 19, 2009 1:41 PM PDT
well it's not just Cnet look at tech blogs like Engaget Gizmondo
just about every other news site has reported it too
People are interested in the Iphone believe t or not
the thing about the Iphone is it's one model hence gets more coverage unlike a plethora of models from RIM Nokia Etc !

But Still the word Iphone Killer is so lame ,I wish they'd stop with that non-sense
by rafalek2000 June 19, 2009 2:14 PM PDT
Seven7dust.
You do have a point.
However, if you go on youtube and type in phone and unboxing and you will get hundreds of hits. That is Youtube. I just expect better from Cnet, Gizmodo and Engadgets
by datamuncher June 19, 2009 1:44 PM PDT
I think the interesting story is that competitors and media keep messaging new phones as "iPhone Killers", but what has really happened is that the iPhone has catalyzed a change in how we view phones.

Phones now:
* carry and and let you play your music collection
* show movies and TV
* carry and amend your favorite photo collection
* link users to the internet anywhere - full web, email, synchonization, other services
* play handheld quality games
* run sophisticated internet and location based applications

Many other phones had the capability/capacity to do all these things, but only Apple had access to enough of the external pieces to put the right things together in a meaningful way for the broad consumer marketplace.

I look forward to many additonal "iPhone Killer" choices as the iPhone continues to set the bar for all the cool, wacky, or truly useful things a phone can do !
Reply to this comment
by jbozzo June 19, 2009 6:05 PM PDT
I think the most important part to take from this is that many of my phones in the past (like my windows smartphone 5 years ago) had these functions but no phone till the iphone did all of them so well.
by qhuetastique June 19, 2009 3:44 PM PDT
For me it comes down to the iPhone 3G|S|, the thing that complements my Mac(s-I'm thinking about upgrading to a unibody) and syncs with it officially, the Palm Pre which I think has a more robust interface than the iPhone and works beautifully and also syncs with iTunes. an Android Phone because T-Mobile, unlike ahem, Sprint (my current carrier), hasn't served me wrong. the Nokia N97 because my old Nokia 6126 hasn't served me wrong, unlike ahem, my LG Rumor with Sprint. The BlackBerry, any phone with Windows Mobile, and any phone on Sprint and Verizon that isn't the Palm Pre are all to me unusable and horribly clunky and slow. How can anyone even call the Voyager or the Instinct an iPhone Killer, they barely support apps, their interface is just slow.
Reply to this comment
by jbozzo June 19, 2009 4:28 PM PDT
I'm sorry if i offend some people here including kent but this article makes absolutely no sense at all. All industries have a benchmark in which all companies and products are compared to. in the phone biz the iphone has created a new benchmark for the industry. It would be illogical not to compare every phone to the iphone. "iphone killer" - a catch phrase representing this benchmark. What's so wrong?

Its assumed that apple will be a step ahead for the next couple of years or so but the next company or product will create a new benchmark in which the the rest is compared to. Because these phones are becoming so common i think people just forgot the world of horrible touch screens, lack of app support, sd carded memory, and sluggish Operating Systems.
Reply to this comment
by 3ollie June 19, 2009 4:52 PM PDT
the iPhone won't be killed by any competitor, so long as there are people who would plop down $200 for a pile of pig excrement if it had an apple logo on it
Reply to this comment
by amoreno73 June 19, 2009 4:54 PM PDT
Ever since the first gen iphone came out it did something no other phone could do. Sell in record numbers in a price of $499/$599 to people who are willing to switch to AT&T from other carriers. No matter the flaws for the first gen iphone to the iphone 3g people would still buy it. I would guess ?iphone killer? comes from no phone yet is able to pull this off no matter how their technology is better. Time will tell.
Reply to this comment
by devan151 June 19, 2009 7:43 PM PDT
I don't even see how we're having this conversation... The author is right. Naming new phones to the market "iphone killer" is like naming a new NFL franchise the "Greenbay Packers killer" (a good team and the most popular but far from the best)

I've done the reading and played with quite a few handsets and would place the iphone in the top 7 but not on top of the cell phone market.
Off the top of my head here's a few reason's why I bought the N85 over the iphone 3g

-stereo bluetooth
-record videos
-send/receive mms
-camera flash
-5 megapixel camera
-fm transmitter
-fm receiver
-copy and paste
-Voicedialing
-louder speakers
-better Map software (iphone gps is faster and looks cooler though)
-not tied to att (although I do need att to use 3G on the N85)
-secondary camera on front
-3.5mm audio output jack (also sends video to tv)
-micro-usb charging
-removable mem card

Other than the cool interface, larger screen (not OLED), sexiness, and well organized app store I wouldn't of even considered the iphone while phone shopping. 3G S shows some improvement but ultimately gets ate up by N85's functionality. apple is where it is in the phone biz because of awesome marketing and a preinstalled brainwashed fanbase.
Reply to this comment
by grasshopper111 June 19, 2009 8:09 PM PDT
No kiddn. Kent, what phone do you use? I take it you have verizon? Please grade the iphone for what it is don't stray by saying "iphone killer" and try to down the iphone. Pre software is from Apple's former employees. It good but not great. Cards of WebOS is Apples Tab in iphone. Don't worry Verison will get their version of iphone and you, Bonnie and cnet news lady will be happy then. Kent even Bonnie said it " pre is not iphone killer" BMW is always BMW nothing else stands against it nor will the iphone have a challenger. Now the truth of the matter is ATT may the iphone killer. Iphone has everything and as a student developer, i cant wait to get my App out there. Stop bashing and start using the product on a daily bases.
Reply to this comment
by DrtyDogg June 19, 2009 10:21 PM PDT
"Pre software is from Apple's former employees." Don't forget that he worked for IBM before Apple. . . is there a point?
by nihouma June 19, 2009 11:02 PM PDT
They said "pre is not an iPhone killer" because they recognize the iPhone has its place for the style conscious and trendy, and the Pre has its place for the web-centric folks out there...just like Android is for those who like customization. WM is for those who value power, and BB is for the messaging centric...

Of course, those are all just simplifications for the different smartphone OSes, as there are many reasons why a person would be drawn to a particular platform...
by kinster002 June 19, 2009 9:47 PM PDT
I have to admit that the Iphone is as nice phone but no matter how good it may be I still don't want one and nor will I ever own one. I'm sure there are a lot of people like me and like me will not become a member of AT&T just to get a Iphone. I feel like there making seem like there should only be one phone and thats the Iphone and that will be like everyone driving the same model car in black. Since nobody wants to own the same phone the Palm Pre's, Winmobile's, blackberries, Androids are all here to stay. They will not kill the Iphone and nor will the iphone kill them!
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (39 Comments)
Subscribe to the Dialed In podcast

Subscribe to the audio podcast via RSS
Subscribe to the video podcast via RSS

Subscribe to the audio podcast via iTunes
Subscribe to the video podcast via iTunes

advertisement

About Dialed In Podcast

Whether it's for just making calls or for cramming your entire life into one device, the ubiquitous cell phone continues to evolve. Each Wednesday cell phone editors Kent German, Bonnie Cha and Nicole Lee meet to discuss the latest cell phone news and answer your questions. Join us to find out what's in, what's out and what's coming next.

Send us e-mail at dialedin@cnet.com or call us at 1-866-402-2638 (CNET) and be a part of the show.


Add this feed to your online news reader

Dialed In Podcast topics

More on Dialed In
Dialed In on CNET Live
Dialed In Facebook group
CNET Reviews: Cell phones
Cell phone ringtones and accessories
Cell phone user forums
Discuss cell phone: Make the call
On Call columns
Cell phone blogs
Cell phone features
Meet The Dialed In hosts
Bonnie Cha Bonnie Cha reviews the latest smart phones, PDAs, and GPS devices, helping CNET readers get their hands on the latest mobile electronics. See profile
Kent German Kent German is CNET's cell phone editor and has been following the wireless industry for seven years. He's embarrassed to admit he can name almost any cell phone he sees on the street. See profile
Nicole Lee Nicole Lee reviews cell phones and their accessories for CNET, thus satisfying her love for all things small, shiny, and digital.See profile
Podroll
When you're not listening to Dialed In, here's some other great podcasts to try.
The Cell Phone Junkie
The Apple Phone Show
60-Second Science
East Meets West
Other CNET podcasts