• On GameSpot: So-called 'Halo killer' gets 23 to life
June 30, 2009 9:56 AM PDT

The 404 373: Where we announce the worst movie of the summer

by Justin Yu

I'll ruin the surprise for you right now: the worst movie of the summer (only four days in so far) is "Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen." On today's show, we rip apart this atrocity even more, spoiler-free! Wilson also gives us his first impressions of his brand new Apple iPhone 3GS and discovers the weirdest camera issue ever. I love you, Wilson, but that came out of NOWHERE!

Controversial characters Skids and Mudflap

(Credit: Complex.com)

So I finally broke down and saw "Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen" last night, and although I can't give away too many plot details, suffice it to say that I'm throwing in my vote for it being the WORST movie of the summer. Sure, summer blockbusters are supposed to be silly and entertaining, but a truckload of physical humor and irritating little side-stories ruined what could have been an awesome action movie. Where are the Transformers fanboys on this one? This betrayal feels like that "Spiderman 3" abomination all over again! Apart from the movie being about an hour too long (2.5 hours total, say whaaatt?), the only parts worth watching are the epic fight scenes and Megan Fox jumping/running/screaming/rolling through explosions. We also address that whole racist robot plot point yet again--now that I've actually seen the movie, I wouldn't say that characters are straight-up racist, but the gold tooth and excessive slang are definitely in poor taste and an unnecessarily stereotypical slight at hip-hop. Listen in for more details.

The next story is about gaming company Global Gaming Factory X resurrecting The Pirate Bay as a legal file-distro site. After a bit of confusion about how exactly that whole case ended, we're still left wondering why companies keep trying to cannibalize on the success of dead P2P sites, relying on the name alone to tread water and maybe even gain a few new subscribers. The problem is that it never works! Napster, anyone? Who's idea was that, anyway? "Hey guys, let's buy this dead service that still exists only to bait people into RIAA lawsuits and relaunch the site with legit, paid content. It's all about brand confidence, right?" Good luck with that, doods.

Finally, we're announcing BIG changes on the show tomorrow including the triumphant debut of our new logo (based on Blake Stevenson's winning design) and a few surprises to go along with it! We're also excited to have Brendt Barbur of the Bicycle Film Festival as our guest on tomorrow's show. Check it out LIVE tomorrow @ 11AM ET at CNET Live.

EPISODE 373



Download today's podcast

Subscribe in iTunes audio | Suscribe to iTunes (video) | Subscribe in RSS Audio | Subscribe in RSS Video








Justin Yu covers desktop computers, printers, and peripherals for CNET. When he's not scouring eBay for useless ephemera or eating hot dogs for breakfast, he spends his time making fun of Internet culture every morning on The 404 podcast. E-mail Justin.
Recent posts from The 404
The 404 463: Where we're not that funny, but at least we try
The 404 462: Where we make it too easy
The 404 461: Where we turn down the ugly knob
The 404 460: Where we turn it up to 11
The 404 459: Where we walk the streets at 3 a.m.
The 404 458: Where daylight comes and we want to go home
The 404 457: Where Justin gets some tail on Halloween
The 404 456: Where we like to strike out
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (57 Comments)
by r_tadlock June 30, 2009 10:46 AM PDT
If Transformers 2 is such a bad movie, then why is it killing it at the box office? Every time a new movie comes out from Michael Bay people who "know what a good movie is" slam it. I just don't get it. Just enjoy the movie for what it is: a shoot em up action movie with a little T&A. Maybe it's just me, I don't know.
Reply to this comment
by retroboy77 June 30, 2009 12:10 PM PDT
I think it's the success of the movie that causes this kind of backlash. I was intermitantly, moderately entertained by that movie but more often I was emberassed to be there. The Robot with the phallic gun, the racist twins, the transformer testicles, John Turturro (ugh!), the cylon transformer, teleportation, Sam's vision, the high mother, the father, those little dogs, the geography annoyed me sooooo much, but that was forgivable.
I love Transofrmers, and I even enjoy the transformer parts in this movie (except when they're trying to be funny), what I don't like is how insane he went in every other direction.
It's definitely not just you who liked this movie, and that's the entire reason why it's important that we tear it down. It shouldn't be alright to like this kind of...stuff. I'm pretty sure we can all agree that the American Box Office chart isn't the best place to look to when you're trying to find quality.
by blackshadowed June 30, 2009 12:19 PM PDT
The only reason the movie killed at the box office is because people are going in based on trailers and getting something entirely different than what they expected when they get there. I went on first Wednesday and on the way out heard more than one uttered "I want my money back". Even my friend who doesn't seat through a movie unless is an action flick regretted paying for this.

The entire thing was confusing, long and so full of plot wholes that I even lost count. I suspect that as the word spreads the movie won't do as good this coming weekend.

Like somebody else said: "Is like watching paint dry while getting hit on the head with a frying pan".
by sadacori June 30, 2009 2:04 PM PDT
I think the only reasons why it's so successful is because:

1) the first movie was a big hit
2) school's out
by ccmike72 July 1, 2009 4:12 PM PDT
because stupid people like stupid movies and the world is full of stupid people. Also board people
by heymikemason July 2, 2009 12:26 AM PDT
Ha ha... stupid people and BOARD people. Good one! Wait, you meant to do that, right?
by denewbgp June 30, 2009 11:58 AM PDT
^^ agree with r_tadlock. Sure transformers 2 is not a jewel of storytelling, but u got to take it for what it is.
And jeff really put me off with his hatorade yesterday even if he didnt mean it.
Reply to this comment
by justin.yu June 30, 2009 12:49 PM PDT
i agree that people went to go see the movie because of the exciting trailer, but most people came out feeling disappointed, at least judging by the online reviews. i didn't want to say so, but since someone already called it out, I was really upset with the whole 'robot testicle' part. don't get me wrong, i'm all for robocles, but transformers isn't a joke! it's something we all grew up on, and michael bay made a mockery of its fame. i just think that if you're going to make a movie about such a beloved cartoon/comic like batman, superman, x-men, transformers, etc... you need to do your best to make sure the original fans are satisfied. i agree that it's not easy, but they shouldn't leave the theater feeling like the butt of a joke for the past two and a half hours. if it were an original concept, then sure, cybernuts are fine fine fine, but not this time.

justin
Reply to this comment
by Electronic_Dreamer July 1, 2009 12:20 PM PDT
"i didn't want to say so, but since someone already called it out, I was really upset with the whole 'robot testicle' part. don't get me wrong, i'm all for robocles, but transformers isn't a joke! it's something we all grew up on, and michael bay made a mockery of its fame." Response: It was meant to be funny im pretty sure that was Miachel Bay intention with that scene i mean the movie does make a lot of jokes. personally i found it funny
by george_liquor July 1, 2009 3:51 PM PDT
I'd love to jump on the 'Michael Bay raped my childhood' bandwagon too, but the truth is Transformers the Cartoon Show was just a vehicle (pardon the pun) to sell Transformers the Toy Line. It wasn't the pinnacle of high art--it wasn't even a particularly good cartoon.
by myndmelt June 30, 2009 1:12 PM PDT
I went to see it on saturday, and I was consistantly entertained. There are some aspects that I think they could have left out, like the swinging testicles like menioned above. But I mean, I have seen far worse movies in the past few years. I'm just saying, that I went into to see some good action and and cutting edge cgi, and a smoking hot megan fox. And to me this movie delivered. I'm not sure what you guys were expecting but you have to remember that this is based off a comic/cartoon where they did alot of goofy and silly things and noone ever cried about that.
Reply to this comment
by rhapsodyartist June 30, 2009 1:30 PM PDT
Just to chime in one last time here, entertaining and good aren't mutually exclusive. And it doesn't have to be a sob story about child prostitutes or a love story between war-torn lovers. What was BAD about the movie wasn't the cool explosions and eye-candy.

What was BAD was the storytelling. There was no reason to watch the characters, no motivations, no worthy arcs, no stakes whatsoever. They spent the last two hours trying to bring Optimus back to save the world? There was never a good reason WHY? Even the characters are saying they don't know why they are doing it.

The pacing in the middle hour of the movie was just awful. They just spent hours/days wandering around in the desert?!?! ***? And the whole trick ending when Sam pretends to "die"... yeah... sure... like we were ever going to believe the lead character in the main series either Optimus or Sam were going to die. Or were we ever going to find it credible that Sam couldn't tell Mikeala that he loved her. She's EFFING Megan Fox.

Bad jokes in the movie aside, it was just poor storytelling. Plain and simple: characters make choices and have to pay for the consequences of them. Not wander around aimlessly listening to what other people do and then reacting to it. This happened in the first film. Sam was a strong character up until the ending of the first movie when the choices he made were inane and the goal didn't make any sense.

And I loved seeing the robots transform and battle it out as much as anyone else. But 1) out of all the newest characters we're introduced to why do we have to spend the most screen time with the two most annoying ones who transformed into a beatdown ice cream truck or a freakin' Chevy... beyond the racism. 2) Nobody gave a crap when they fought because we spend any time with the characters before they fought. We had no empathy for them. It was just eye-candy without any meaning. I mean we could have just watched two nameless machines fight it out instead of watching two hours where Sam just wanders around the effing dessert. And did it only bother me that almost every single Decepticon look the same? Or that the ending fight with the Fallen was all over 30 seconds long? I thought the Fallen was suppose to be bad ass. And how does one Prime beat the Fallen when the other 13 couldn't?

I know we're suppose to turn our brains off for these movies, but I disagree with people who think a movie can be as dumb as they want. Look at Terminator 2. One of the best action films of all time. 15 years later, it's still good, the effects are good, and the characters are good. They make real choices and deal with real consequences, so when things happen like the Terminator sacrificing himself at the end, really move you/entertain you.

Yes, there are far worse movies out there. But they didn't cost 200 million dollars to make and had a team of some of the most talented people in Hollywood working on them.
Reply to this comment
by justin.yu June 30, 2009 1:41 PM PDT
you just ruined the ending, dummy
by ddawg82 June 30, 2009 4:10 PM PDT
whew, good thing i already saw the movie wilson!

but all kidding aside, as much as i agree with wilson on most of his points, you really had to have kept expectations low for this movie, even before the initial reviews came out. a few points on why:

1. it's a michael bay movie. the guy is practically the king for making huge budget movies that require the IQ of a potato to understand. in fact, it's prob. best if you minimize on the thinking to enjoy his movies, which are all pretty much about explosions, hot girls, and minimal plot logic/cohesion): e.g. bad boys, armageddon, pearl harbor, the texas chainsaw massacre... need i say more?
2. the trailer itself should've been a pretty big indicator to where the movie was going. megan fox in her short shorts in slow mo, the transformers acting as comic relief... wait did i just sum up the entire movie?
3. the movie's clearly made for teenage boys. to expect anything else is just... well, u're just asking to be disappointed.

anyways, i'm not so much defending the movie as saying, given the people behind it, it's no surprise that we ended up with something like this. perhaps if j.j. abrams or christopher nolan directed it, we would've ended up with something different. but then again, we could've had joel schumacher and transformer nipples... o_O

it's def. a shame that the movie didn't excel in the way i think many of us hoped that it would. in fact, many of us might have been insulted watching our favorite childhood characters dumbed down with gold teeth and illiteracy. but what's sadder is that the huge box office earnings from the movie only reinforces the message to hollywood that at the end of the day, a successful movie does not require it being a "good" movie.
by wbandoy June 30, 2009 7:03 PM PDT
Soooo.. basically you're saying you didn't like Michael Bay's romantic comedy?

...oh, it's an action film? My bad! What a horrible movie! Completely agree with Wilson Tang! Although, I'd like to see more Arcee.

Btw, did anyone notice the Decepticon symbol and then say "suck my popsicle" on the ice cream truck in the beginning?
by Electronic_Dreamer July 1, 2009 12:15 PM PDT
"What was BAD was the storytelling.was no reason to watch the characters, no motivations, no worthy arcs, no stakes whatsoever. They spent the last two hours trying to bring Optimus back to save the world? There was never a good reason WHY? Even the characters are saying they don't know why they are doing it. -The reason why was because they needed optimus to be brought back to life to defeat "The Fallen". THERE'S YOUR "MOTIVATION" AND "WHY". "And how does one Prime beat the Fallen when the other 13 couldn't?"
-because the other 13 were out numbered in that civil war they had in cybertron. But 1) out of all the newest characters we're introduced to why do we have to spend the most screen time with the two most annoying ones who transformed into a beatdown ice cream truck or a freakin' Chevy... beyond the racism. 2) Nobody gave a crap when they fought because we spend any time with the characters before they fought. We had no empathy for them. It was just eye-candy without any meaning. I mean we could have just watched two nameless machines fight it out instead of watching two hours where Sam just wanders around the effing dessert. 1),2): They probably thought poeple would find them funny not racist "Or were we ever going to find it credible that Sam couldn't tell Mikeala that he loved her. She's EFFING Megan Fox."
-does it really matter?
by fenfai June 30, 2009 1:33 PM PDT
Just like how Slumdog Millionaire won best picture of Oscars this year, I was totally surprised. Entertaining? Yes. But Oscars Best Picture and Best Director? Come on!
Reply to this comment
by simongchacha June 30, 2009 2:03 PM PDT
i think that if you enjoyed this movie and were able to dismiss the many gripes that were mentioned you're just simply not a discerning viewer.
i watched this movie for free through my gf's hook-ups at mtv and still felt a bit disappointed. sure, it's more or less a shoot-em-up action flick but i don't think that's an excuse for all the plot holes and silliness that went into it. i didn't go into the theater expecting something elaborately genius but at least something that built up a little more on the first movie with a bit more creativity in the story. but instead i was pretty much served a plate a stupid and ***'s. with this said, the action and CG was great and pretty much the only things in the movie worth watching.

r_tadlock, i think much of the reason for transformer 2's success so far is because it's just one of those movies that, if you were planning to see it, you would see it no matter how much people bashed it. if i hadn't seen yet but had still heard all of the negative comments, i'd still go see it.

my 2¢
Reply to this comment
by Electronic_Dreamer July 2, 2009 3:43 PM PDT
"i think that if you enjoyed this movie and were able to dismiss the many gripes that were mentioned you're just simply not a discerning viewer."
I enjoyed the movie because it was well made!!!
by r_tadlock June 30, 2009 4:07 PM PDT
@ retroboy77 - I agree with a lot of what you said. But I take exception to "it shouldn't be ok to like this...stuff". Why shouldn't it be? Because a certain group of "elite" movie reviewers say so? Quality (at least with regard to movies) is somewhat subjective, and if the movie fits into a particular viewers quality thresh hold then why shouldn't it be ok for them to like it? I don't think the movie was great, in fact I agree that the story telling was sub par at best, but like rhapsodyartist said, "entertainment value and good aren't mutually exclusive" and it just so happens that I get entertained by CGI and explosions.

Also, after reading the rest of the comments, I can see how people would be disappointed with the movie and maybe my comment was a little knee jerk.

--Rob
Reply to this comment
by ddawg82 June 30, 2009 4:36 PM PDT
yahoo just published a list of the top 10 gaping plot holes in the movie: http://movies.yahoo.com/feature/smg-transformers-10-questions.html
Reply to this comment
by July 1, 2009 4:02 PM PDT
"yahoo just published a list of the top 10 gaping plot holes in the movie: http://movies.yahoo.com/feature/smg-transformers-10-questions.html"

answers to your questions (part 1)

1) hey, a lot of people will take the dough just to shut up. They probably discredited jon voight. And hey, its been 2 years since the first encounter, thus became internet rumor.

2) talk about paying attention, they cant use the piece of allspark that sam had because they need to revive Jetfire(the SR-71 blackbird, ok pay attention now *******!), he is the only one who can read/translate the symbols (optimus cannot) and can help them lead to the tomb of the primes (where the matrix is located). Now, if they used it to revive optimus prime (and im sure they wouldnt hesitate), then they wouldnt be able to find the matrix and the energon machine (sun-energy absorbing machine). The fallen knows where the machine is but its only a matter of time for him to find the matrix. Sam's/autobots' enemy was time. Its as simple as that!

3) You got this one right, the 6th robot was the "doctor". And yes, you can detect a small object the size of that "decepticon doc". Have you ever heard of sonar equipment that people use when they are fishing (sport fishing, recreational fishing)? Yeah, they use those to track fish! Thats the civilian counter part. What the navy was using was a military grade, so you get the idea, right? I'll forgive you on this one, since you are not the type of person who is familiar with sonar technology.

4) I believe michael bay intended to do that so he could be identified by the audience as "the doctor" in a humorous way. "Couldn't he just get his eyes adjusted? You'd think with all the laser guns, someone could perform a Lasik procedure." I can see that you're taking this movie way too seriously.

5) Decepticons/Autobots obviously have nano-based technology (nano means 1 billionth of a meter or 1 millionth of a millimeter). An average size for a human cell is 10 micrometer which is a lot larger than a nanometer (consult your metric system please!). That means it can imitate human structures, color etc. at a nano level (pretty much every cell types). What now? You're wondering how it feels like to touch a decepticon's ass?

There is a reason why they call them transformers you F*&(*^ moron!! So a human or a robot wont be able to detect them! "Robots in disguise" listen to the cartoon theme song.

Bumblebee damaged his voice modulator upon entry to our planet (T1) maybe it wasnt completely fixed? buddy you're nitpicking, just stay with your chic flick movies.
by July 1, 2009 4:03 PM PDT
"yahoo just published a list of the top 10 gaping plot holes in the movie: http://movies.yahoo.com/feature/smg-transformers-10-questions.html"

answers to your questions (part 2)

6) Wow, you really have a mind of 4-year old. You are like" where did my sister come from?", "what is sex?", Wait a minute, you are just plain retarded! Being a prime descendant doesn't necessarily mean he came from a robot mother (or went through the whole pregnancy thing) , they came from the same machine that created the primes!
The primes couldnt gang up on him because he was too strong. Were you even awake during the movie? The REMAINING Primes sacrificed themselves fusing their bodies to contain the matrix. That means the primes lost the battle to the fallen's army, F$%#@ idiot!! Primes have exceptional fighting skills thats what makes optimus special. Thats why the fallen is afraid of him.

optimus was dealing with 3 decepticons when megatron stabbed him from behind.

Its not just Jetfire's creeky parts, but they merged him with his life force(energon), too. Thats what made him stronger. I can see that you have not seen the original cartoon transformers.

7) Again, NITPICKING! i've never been to the smithsonian museum but i know for a fact that old planes are gutted, refurbished, repainted before displaying them in a museum. It was obvious it was a military plane graveyard.

8) YES they can, especially at 130-150mph. there is no traffic on the desert, right? maybe a couple of camels.

Matt, Matt, Matt, lack of knowledge in military weaponry. Railguns really do exist. In fact, US NAVY has several working prototypes. Railguns can easily cover 250 miles, compared to gas expansion based (regular guns mounted on a destroyer/battleship) projectile which has 50-mile distance limit. Its projectile can travel as fast as 15000 feet/second. Giza is 80miles inland you said? So the railgun projectile would reach Devastator in about 28-29 seconds? Moving target you said? not a problem, you can fire different kinds of railgun projectiles regular ones and satellite or laser guided ones. BUT heres the thing ******* (im sorry i cant help it, you really are a dumb person), John Turturro was talking to the Captain of an AIRCRAFT CARRIER! The Destroyer (which is a smaller ship) that was carrying the railgun was already in the Nile river which is what, less than a mile from Giza! It was the DESTROYER that was tracking and targeting Devastator!

Turturro wasnt using a walkie-talkie he was using a satellite linked phone. His phone was either a dedicated satellite linked phone or linked to a ground-based satellite signal receiver/transmitter which was with tyrese, josh and the rest of the military personnel! Oh my God! How stupid and ignorant are you?

9) He didnt exactly go to heaven or robot heaven, the matrix was trying to get in touch with Sam while he was unconscious (i think). The primes are mystical ancient robots, who knows what they are capable of.

10) Where does Sam's bandage come from? WHEN JETFIRE TELEPORTED THEM. What about his extra sock? WHY THE F@#$ DO YOU CARE? DO YOU HAVE SOCK FETISH ? Why does Sam's roommate not contribute anything at all? JUST LIKE YOU. What was the Fallen doing for those thousands of years Megatron was frozen in ice? LOOKING FOR EARTH? I DONT KNOW, JACKIN OFF? How does one satellite receive transmissions from everywhere on the planet? BECAUSE MOST SATELLITES ARE LINKED TOGETHER MORON! ESPECIALLY MILITARY ONES! THERES HUNDREDS OF THEM IN THE OUTER SPACE ORBITING THE PLANET! Why does Wheelie hump Mikaela's leg? ASK WHEELIE. Why do we have to see John Turturro's thong? YOU LOVE IT, HUH? Why are robots who join together to become Devastator also seen fighting the Army at the same time? THOSE WERE DIFFERENT ONES Why does the government want only our military fighting Decepticons when our weapons seem unable to make so much as a dent on any of them? WE ARE CAPABLE OF DESTROYING THEM, JDAMS, TANK PROJECTILES, and CANNONS dont forget the RAILGUN!. Why did the ancient Egyptians build a pyramid around the sun-destroying machines instead of just breaking it? JESUS!!! Why is the Matrix of Leadership bigger in the Fallen's hand than in Sam's? MOTHER OF GOD.. And how do Mikaela's pants stay so clean? THAT EXPLAINS WHY YOU DIDNT UNDERSTAND THE MOVIE.

MATT DANIELS, dont act as if you're a smart guy, and quit trying. Most of your questions can be answered by a 5th grader, honestly. And you really need to see the movie several times, its obvious you missed a lot of things. How REALISTIC do you want a SCI-FI MOVIE just to satisfy your pea-sized brain? IT'S a SCIENCE FICTION MOVIE, *******!!! Do me a favor, stick with your chic flicks.
by PacGamer June 30, 2009 4:56 PM PDT
Well...I thinks it's obvious that The 404's review of Transformers 2 was absolute **** --- not to mention Wilson's BS. This episode was the hardest one to listen to.

For anyone you wants an excellent review watch the Totally Rad Show's: http://revision3.com/trs/liftupable

Wilson needs to learn to not speak out of his ass and actually think about what he says. nuff sed.
Reply to this comment
by PacGamer June 30, 2009 5:09 PM PDT
Just to clarify, Wilson was right to bring up the 'racist' claim, but he says way too much then cannot back it up with anything 'intelligent'. I am just pissed at all 3 of you for not just attacking the movie, but saying that if anyone actually loved it, they are (insert exact quote here). There is just so many things that I want to explain to you guys...... To me and many, many others, this was a great film. And Jeff.......don't just go with what Justin and WIlson say..... just watch the damn movie....you may actually like it.

Still love the show. I <3 you guys.
by justin.yu June 30, 2009 6:26 PM PDT
is it reasonable to call a review "****?" to me, it seems like a review is just vocalizing an opinion, that's all. many people clearly liked it, but saying that Totally Rad Show's review is "excellent" compared to our "****" just because you shared their opinion and disagreed with ours ain't right. it's all just opinion folks, take it with a grain of salt and definitely go see it for yourself if you want to.

i also don't remember saying that anyone was a (whatever) for loving it...can you clarify? if i did, i apologize. but seriously, i don't remember calling anyone names for liking the movie.
by PacGamer June 30, 2009 8:49 PM PDT
Well....I didn't mean to come off that way....ugh... I was sort of in what some people say "in the moment".

I dunno what I was saying, and I just wish Cnet had the ability to edit posts. I didn't mean to come off as someone who just recommended someone else's review and opinions over yours... I kind of regret posting that stuff. I was just kind of pissed me off that you and Wilson were saying that it was the Worst movie of the summer (which is completely fine as it is your opinion) ... and then Jeff jumped on the train with you guys to never see it even if it went onto HBO. What kind of set me off even more was Wilson's post..."there are far worse movies out there. But they didn't cost 200 million dollars to make", There was no reason to watch the characters, no motivations, no worthy arcs, no stakes whatsoever."

When I was saying Wilson speaks without thinking, this is what I meant: No reason to watch the characters? If you were to watch Sam's Mom and Dad----at the beginning of the movie Sam's Dad was quick to let his son off to college while his mom was crying and sobbing. Now, at the end, those 2 acts were swapped. Sam's Mom knew that Sam had to go resurrect Optimus while his dad struggled to let him go. This is the exact opposite of the beginning of the movie. These characters /had/ similarities and differences. They /had/ personilities. This /was/ a story. He just failed to actually pay attention to the minute details. (and many have, not just Wilson in particular)

And for the "like we were ever going to believe the lead character in the main series either Optimus or Sam were going to die" --- you haven't seen I am Legend? Haven't Read a Shakespearean Play like Romeo and Juliet or Hamlet? It's a story. Each story has a ?Universe? of it?s own. You do not argue with that universe. Do you argue with Mission Impossible?s or James Bond?s? Some how when the building is about to explode, the character jumps right in time to land in a car to drive away safely. No one complains about that.

That's what I meant----things like that. I do have more to say, but this topic needs to drop?

Well, with that said, if I have offended you, Justin, I apologize. I think I may have put word in you mouth as well. It was just the moment. I don't apologize to just you Justin; if I have offended Jeff or Wilson...I truly am sorry. I really did not mean to call your review or this episode or this show **** or recommend the whatever show's review over yours. It was just the above things and more that set me off and they sort of offended me. Like I said, I still love the show and will continue to do.

Peace?
by PacGamer June 30, 2009 9:02 PM PDT
Again, if what I said is offensive. I really, truly, honestly am sorry.
by rhapsodyartist June 30, 2009 9:35 PM PDT
PacGamer,

Whoa, buddy, intelligent? I didn't think I need to explain much more beyond the gold tooth and jive talk to get across the racism in the movie. And like I said during the show, the writers themselves can't even back that part up. But if you want me to break down the film point by point in a critical analysis I can do that too. I've written coverage for scripts before.

I don't regret saying that Transformers 2 is bad a film. And yes, I was paying attention to the character arcs in the film. The mother/father arc with his son was just terrible, because it made no sense. His father doesn't mind him going to college, but then at the end when he's pleading with his son not to go by himself? That's NOT an arc. There's an effing huge war/battle going around him. It's not a character change to not want their son to run into the battle by himself. What's the lesson? What's the actual, meaningful change? That you should want your son to stay at home more than go to college, but if there is an alien war going on you should let him go?

If you REALLY want to break down story points, then why the eff does Mikeala say, "I love you" rather than Sam. She wasn't the one who had the problem with it. He didn't change at all. ARCs involve CHANGE. Nothing changed about these characters.

My final 2 cents on the matter. Transformers 2 is a terrible story. But if you just want to watch junk exploded for no reason and robots battle for no particular reason go see it.

If you have time this summer, check out Up, or The Hangover, or The Hurt Locker, Star Trek, or 500 Days of Summer.
by PacGamer June 30, 2009 10:33 PM PDT
I get get were your coming from Wilson. And now that you brought up some more point, all that you were saying really does make sense. And now that I think about, I really don't know why I defended this movie. I am listening through the episode once more and now understand what you were saying and, well, -I agree-. The movie was long and if it weren't for Megan Fox, I would have been displeased. This was my bad.

We cool, bro? Peace.
by justin.yu June 30, 2009 10:46 PM PDT
don't even worry about it, dude! i can only speak for myself, but i'm not taking of any this very seriously at all- its a movie about robot vehicles :) and believe it or not, i love hearing about what you have to say about the show, good or bad, we're always making improvements to the content and you're obviously a part of that. thanks, chris!

anyway, i encourage everyone to listen to our show, listen to Totally Rad Show's...uhh...show, read reviews, and make a decision for yourself!

justin
by rhapsodyartist July 1, 2009 3:50 AM PDT
We're cool.
by JazGalaxy July 1, 2009 12:06 PM PDT
O_o

I'm a little confused about this because, as someone who loves TRS... 2/3 of them said the movie was almost unwatchably bad.

The only one who liked it was Alex who is the same person who skips all game cut scenes, doesn't like comic books unless they're about superheroes and won't get excited about movies where they talk a lot. I love the guy and watch all his shows, and frequently agree with him, but he definitely represents the low brow scale of TRS.
by mike55mass June 30, 2009 5:14 PM PDT
The critic's wouldn't know a good film even if came up and kick them in there ass faces
Reply to this comment
by wbandoy June 30, 2009 7:31 PM PDT
Fyi, anyone trying to click on the "Megan Fox jumping/running/screaming/rolling through explosions" won't work. Copy and paste the following down below and drop it into your address bar.

http://tformers.net/g/generated/11279/transformers2-promos-megan-fox_net-3__scaled_500.jpg
Reply to this comment
by Henzapper June 30, 2009 11:42 PM PDT
I think there's a way bigger problem with race in this movie, and it has nothing to do with that gold-toothed autobot.

Did anyone pay attention to the scenes with the soldiers? The two most important soldiers are William Lennox (a white man) and Robert Epps (a black man), both of whom I believe are from the first movie. Anyways, every scene they're in, Lennox has all this dialogue in which he vocalizes his support of the autobots and how important they are. Epps then follows this with a one-liner in slang. This goes on in EVERY SINGLE SCENE with the soldiers. Lennox's "We have to protect Optimus and find Sam Witwicky!" is met by Epps' "We 'bout to get our ***** kicked!"

I'm not one to talk about race in movies, but I couldn't help it with this one. I seriously think Michael Bay or whoever was in charge of this (probably Michael Bay) either really believes or promotes that this is how black people talk.
Reply to this comment
by bsunny627 July 1, 2009 11:24 AM PDT
isn't it revenge of the fallen? not rise of? In either case I was entertained, and that's really all there is to say about this movie. Transformers never was and never will be an intelectually stimulating and thought provoking franchise. Also I don't quite see how the twins are considered racist. It's a portrayal of a stereotype sure, but if you don't like what you see, then try and change the perception.
Reply to this comment
by Electronic_Dreamer July 1, 2009 12:26 PM PDT
I dont care what anyone says that movie was the best one yet! and i saw the 1st Transformers twice and bought the collector's edition. i saw Transformer 2 twice on Imax it Was Spectacular! .
Reply to this comment
by July 1, 2009 12:30 PM PDT
Not a lot to add except that this movie blows chunks. All the hype in the trailers led to a turd of a movie. That's what trailers are designed to do you know. Get in you into the theater. Get your money. Help the producer/director/bad actors add another house to their worldly possessions. And most times, when you get into the theater, the movie is nothing like you imagined it to be. Transformers 2 should be deep-sixed right next to the septic tank in my front yard. Ironic, they both smell the same. Shame on you Michael Bay.
Reply to this comment
by sapper6 July 1, 2009 1:21 PM PDT
Transformers 2 the worst movie of the summer? Umm... No. Try "Land of the Lost". I'll never get that hour and 45 minutes back in my life.

Coming from a true Transformers Fan-boy (I collected them as a kid, watched the cartoons while they were still on air, and saw the original movie when it came out in theaters) trust me when I say that the movie was true to the name.

The movie has a lot of elements of the original cartoon in it. I won't ruin it for you, but anyone that has watched the cartoons (oldschool or newschool) will be able to pick out all the goodies in the movie.

Could the movie have been better? Sure! But remember there is no such thing as a perfect movie, no matter how reminiscent you want to be. This is definitely worth of the title it has as "Summer Blockbuster". Take the kids, or special someone and see it. You will have a good time--promise.
Reply to this comment
by soccermatt July 1, 2009 2:10 PM PDT
I don't care what everybody else said about the movie, but i enjoyed it. I thought it had great audio and video and it reached my expectations. And...its pretty bad when Justin Yu can even get the title correct. It's Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, not Transformers: Rise of the Fallen. DUH
Reply to this comment
by justin.yu July 1, 2009 5:55 PM PDT
whoops! i guess that shows how much attention i paid to this bag of suck :)
by MichaelBraxton July 1, 2009 3:06 PM PDT
This is the worst movie I have seen in recent years. The Mudflaps and Skids characters were idiotic charicatures that added nothing to the plot and should have been left out. The story makes no sense and is riddled with plot holes. Basically, the story is an excuse to have exlposions. Dont waste your money....wait for it to come to HBO, and when it does, you still shouldn't watch it. Its just that bad.

Also, the ***** gun and robot testicles, ***? This is a movie directed towards KIDS, that's the problem for any fanboys who are wondering why people are pissed about that.
Reply to this comment
by Electronic_Dreamer July 2, 2009 3:46 PM PDT
"Also, the ***** gun and robot testicles, ***? This is a movie directed towards KIDS, that's the problem for any fanboys who are wondering why people are pissed about that."
not really a kids movie, and its a movie for anyone who wants to see it!
by atomicbomb156 July 1, 2009 3:45 PM PDT
Lots of explosions + robots that transform into various vehicles and back into robots + ridiculously hot girl = very entertaining movie. Isn't that what movies are meant for? I like my movies simple, straightforward, and some hot girls interjected here and there. If I want plot I'll go read a book or watch a play.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (57 Comments)
Subscribe to the 404 podcast

Subscribe to the audio podcast via RSS
Subscribe to the video podcast via RSS

Subscribe to the audio podcast via iTunes
Subscribe to the video podcast via iTunes

advertisement

About The 404

A pop-cult fix for a generation that grew up playing Nintendo and watching Saturday morning cartoons, the 404 podcast, with hosts Jeff Bakalar, Wilson Tang, and Justin Yu, gives you the latest news in gadgets, social media, video games, and movies with snarky commentary and the occasional tasteless joke.

Get in on the show by e-mailing us at the404@cnet.com, or leave us a message at 1-866-404-CNET (2638). Or join up with our Facebook group and get in on the action.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The 404 topics

More on The 404
The 404 on CNET Live
The Four Oh Forums
The 404 Facebook group
The 404 Twitter feed
Jeff Bakalar's Crave posts
Justin Yu's Crave posts
The 404 audio widget (OS X)
The 404 video widget (OS X)
The hosts of the 404
Wilson G. Tang Wilson Tang is an associate producer for CNET TV. He's a part-time artist and filmmaker and has written and directed several films. He likes long walks on the beach and girls.
Jeff Bakalar Jeff Bakalar is an editor for CNET Reviews, getting all the dirt on the gaming industry. After spending a few years in the world of film production, he has settled down and currently lives in New Jersey. He's an avid writer, gamer, and full-time pessimist.
Justin Yu Justin Yu can be found tinkering with printers and other peripherals for CNET, when he's not adjusting his headphones, riding his bike, or eating hot dogs for breakfast.
Honor Roll
When you're not listening to the 404, here's some other great podcasts to try.
Cool Hunting
Fimoculous
SpoutBlog
Engadget
Other CNET podcasts