May 5, 2008 11:38 AM PDT

Lance Armstrong Foundation sued by holder of design patent for BARKSTRONG pet collar

by Chris Ryan
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 2 comments

In an apparent retaliatory lawsuit, Chris Ohman has sued the Lance Armstrong Foundation ("LAF") for infringing a design patent to its "BARKSTRONG" dog collar design. In his complaint, filed in the Northern District of Oklahoma last week, Mr. Ohman claims to own patent rights to the use of the LAF's signature LIVESTRONG mark on pet collars , and accuses "LIVESTRONG" pet collars sold by the LAF of infringement. The lawsuit appears extremely questionable in light of the fact that the Patent Office expressly denied Mr. Ohman design patent protection for collars with the word "LIVESTRONG " printed on them because of prior art found on none other than LAF 's own website.

The dispute between Mr. Ohman and the LAF appears to have begun in June, 2005 when Mr. Ohman began selling yellow pet collars with the markings BARKSTRONG and PURRSTRONG. Last September, to prevent dilution of its Trademark, LAF filed suit against Ohman in the Western District of Texas. According to the Texas complaint filed by the LAF, Mr. Ohman approached the LAF in July of 2005, a few weeks after filing a design patent application that, if granted, would give Ohman a patent on the use of LAF's signature LIVESTRONG mark for dog collars. Mr. Ohman's tactic did not work, and no license was granted. Meanwhile, the Patent Office refused to grant Ohman a patent with the LIVESTRONG mark, and, as shown below, Ohman was forced to remove it from his proposed drawings.

Figure Deleted in Ohman's Design Patent

(Credit: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office)

Undeterred, Mr. Ohman filed a lawsuit that, when scrutinized by the Court, may well raise concerns. Stay tuned for the continuing battle to see whose collars are the strongest.

Chris Ryan is a patent litigator with the law firm of Vinson & Elkin, and do not necessarily reflect those of Vinson & Elkins or its clients. He is a member of the CNET blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. The postings on this site were created for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. Disclaimer.
Recent posts from BLIP: Blogging Patents
Supreme Court grants victory to Quanta in patent case
Helping patent examiners examine patents
Adidas wins big in trademark dispute
Reply to Mr. Ohman concerning patent dispute with Lance Armstrong Foundation
Lance Armstrong Foundation sued by holder of design patent for BARKSTRONG pet collar
RAMBUS: The battle over hold-ups in industry standard setting
Quick appellate review of patent claim constructions: Is the door opening for interlocutory appeals?
A unique brand of monopoly
Add a Comment (Log in or register)
by Chris Ohman May 5, 2008 8:00 PM PDT
The patent in question was issued in November of '07 D556,389. This patent did issue to Chris Ohman.

The is no mention or claim of the divisional patent (LIVESTRONG) in this suit. Please clear the record of this. One other item, the meeting with LAF was to produce the pet collars. No license was asked for at this meeting or discussed.

www.barkstrong.net
Reply to this comment
by frankjohnson123 July 27, 2009 10:35 AM PDT
You are a very sleazy guy to hijack a cancer fighting foundation's brand for your own profit. Disgusting!
Reply to this comment
advertisement

About BLIP: Blogging Patents

Michael Valek, Chris Ryan, and Matt Wermager are lawyers with the firm of firm of Vinson & Elkins LLP. Here, they discuss recent developments in our intellectual property system, the role the law plays to encourage innovation, as well as why any or all of this should matter to the rest of us. The postings on this site were created for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. Disclaimer.

Add this feed to your online news reader

BLIP: Blogging Patents topics