January 2, 2008 6:48 AM PST

Is the 'I can't hear the difference' myth killing the speaker business?

Do you really think they sound the same?

(Credit: Steve Guttenberg)

Sophisticated baby boomers and Gen Xers pride themselves on their ability to appreciate the finer things in life. They're wine snobs, crave gourmet food, drive exotic cars, buy 1080p high definition TVs, but for some bizarre reason think low-end speakers are just dandy. At a New Year's Eve party I polled perfect strangers about their hi-fi systems, and the three men and one woman all said that, sure, music was once really important, but now it's mere background. And they now owned very small systems, because "I can't hear the difference anymore."

Hmmm, I sold audio from the early 1980s to the late 1990s and personally demonstrated hi-fi to thousands of people over the years. Folks in their 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, and more than a few seniors, and I was able to demonstrate a "difference" to well over 80% of them. Many walked in doubting their ears, convinced that "they all sound the same," but once I asked them to focus on the sound they easily discerned even fine subtleties. It's not so different than learning about wines or food. The details become more significant as you become engaged in the subject at hand.

Once I asked my customers, for example, to listen closely to the believability of Eric Clapton vocal, they started to notice differences. Over one speaker Eric seemed to emerge from a box, and over another speaker he all but materialized between the stereo speakers. There was a three dimensional quality to the voice, he was more human. You could hear the body attached to the voice. Once you know what to listen for, the differences aren't at all subtle.

The same listening awareness can be applied to the sound of instruments, do the drums sound like bees buzzing inside a small table radio or can you feel the sticks beating skins, do you catch the bass drum's thump in your chest? Does the rhythm make you want to get up and dance? These aren't small things, and can make a gigantic difference in the way you emotionally connect with the music. Like I said, most people, when presented with bona-fide, better sounding speakers definitely can hear the difference. Sure, whether they want to spend the extra cash, or live with larger speakers is something else. But if you really love music, try to search out a high-end audio store and listen to some of your favorite tunes.

But once you've settled for "good enough" sound, well, who's foolin' who. You're missing out on something good.

advertisement
 
Discover unlimited music for the price of one CD a month
Recent posts from The Audiophiliac
Subwoofer Setup Bass-ics
Subwoofer Setup Bass-ics: Part 2
Subwoofer Setup Bass-ics: Part 1
Shattering audiophile stereotypes
HDtracks: Why settle for iTunes now that you can get CD quality music downloads?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 71 comments (Page 1 of 6)
by john55440 January 2, 2008 11:04 AM PST
Worse yet, are the unfortunate people who confine themselves to listening to compressed digital music, on an MP3 player. They are missing a *lot*. I'm no audiophile, but it's (lossless) CDs and big floor speakers for me.
Reply to this comment
by ladiesmanwc January 2, 2008 11:08 AM PST
I dunno. I've tried myself many times. Once you get above "complete crap", I honestly can't tell a difference. Some speakers do sound DIFFERENT, although it's near impossible for me to figure out which one is actually BETTER. I just go for the one I like better. More so, beyond speakers, I really don't see the value in huge stereo systems or crazy sound cards in computers. A mp3 sound just as good as a CD, to me.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
by demner January 2, 2008 11:11 AM PST
The author is missing the point a bit. If you compare two speakers side-by-side, I totally agree that the difference is usually totally obvious (amazing actually). But if you are at home listening to music, it doesn't really matter that much, especially if it's background to other entertainment.
Reply to this comment View reply
by steinwaytony January 2, 2008 11:14 AM PST
It's never ceased to amaze me, living in New York City, how many people make simultaneous use of $400 iPods and free stock headphones.
Reply to this comment View reply
by Wuzzard January 2, 2008 11:25 AM PST
This is so wrong! When I first bought a home theater system I fell for the audiophile propoganda and bought all the expensive speakers, wiring receivers, etc, and shunned the built in speakers of the television. It did sound different, and it was sometimes better in my opinion than plain-vanilla stereo. However, it was alway such a pain to configure as every program sounded horrible on the settings used by the last program. I was always fiddling and never happy. No one else in my family to figure it out. I got to hating all things compentized. There was so much 'bad' in the design of these things it just was not worth it. A year ago I tossed out all that crap, purchased a new TV (needed to upgrade it anyway), and am using just the built-in stereo speakers, no receiver and have never been happier. Audio technology just sucks.
Reply to this comment
by mitchhellman January 2, 2008 11:29 AM PST
The problem with going to a high-end audio store is that the salespeople generally work on commission or get some sort of incentive for selling certain brands/models. It's pretty easy to rig a demo so that the speakers they don't want you to buy sound like crap. Here are a couple of tips for trying out speakers: 1. Bring to the store a CD of music that you enjoy and are familiar with. That way you can listen for things you haven't heard before-- higher highs, deeper base, distortion, etc. 2. Make sure that when you do a comparison, that it's done with the same music on the same equipment with the same settings; the only difference between A and B should be the speakers. 3. Turn off all equalization and set all tone controls to a 'flat' or neutral position. 4. Ask to see the speakers with the covers off, if possible. Unscrupulous dealers have been known to insert foreign objects in speakers to muffle the ones they don't want you to buy. 5. Bring a friend with you and have them (*not* the salesperson) switch between several sets of speakers while you have your eyes closed. Have them mix up the order in which they play them so that you can make a decision without knowing which speaker system is which. 6. Once you find some speakers that you like, arrange to take them home for a trial on your equipment in your environment. It makes no difference how good a speaker sounds in the showroom, if it sounds bad in your home-- after all, you don't live in the audio store.
Reply to this comment View reply
by minimalist January 2, 2008 11:30 AM PST
Maybe some of this has to do with the lack of mid-range options. Maybe I am just out of the loop but who is carrying on the tradition of companies like NAD's and Advent today? It seems to me that without an accessible middle ground, it should come as no surprise that lots of people are happy to settle for less in their audio equipment. Even I, as someone who can hear the difference between, have a limit as to what I want to spend.
Reply to this comment View reply
by katopotato2008 January 2, 2008 11:39 AM PST
I think that in the past that there were two camps - the true audiophiles and the "toy" purchasers. I don't think the proportion of the population in each group has changed much over the years. With respect to the latter group, they were/are likely more interested in impressing their neighbours & friends rather than in music and good sound. Today, I think that its just a matter of substitution. What this group used to spend on higher end audio equipment is now being spent on home theatre, computers, etc. In the meantime, their appetite for music can be met with an iPod or computer.
Reply to this comment
by mbucci January 2, 2008 11:41 AM PST
This is no surprise. I too often have remarked that Americans not are only musically illiterate, but aurally deficient. Of the five senses (we can forgo mention of the others), hearing scores last place while visual acuity scores first. One need only survey media to confirm this. The internet, movies and television are primarily visual vehicles. As a composer with the curse of hypersensitive hearing, the world seems oblivious to what causes me pain. Yes, I have taken to wearing ear plugs. The MP3 phenomena wouldn't exist if people heard as well as they see. However, this may not be accurate either, for research has indicated that people prefer larger and larger screens at the expense of image detail. As a former audio producer I ask: "Why bother with mega-million dollar recording studios sampling at 192/48 when the listener reports he or she can't hear the difference between a Red Book CD and its miniature MP3 cousin at 256K, or even at 128K AAC? This impairment - and this is the precise term - would be glaring if the movie industry released blockbusters shot on 35mm footage to theatres on Super-8mm. But theatres now are projecting from DVDs. As noted, the secondary problem is of "not caring" about the differences, e.g. how many tracks does my portable player hold at the expense of audio fidelity. So, the decline in the ability to discern technical details seems to apply not only to audio but visual media as well. Need we add overall declines taking place in reading comprehension and concentration? Speak to a teacher or educator or librarian. Shouldn't we ask ourselves how sensory overload and its companion phenomena, insensitivity, have contributed to these deficiencies? How the speed lanes of the internet have conditioned people away from concentrated activites that promote quality to ones that amass quantitative ones? If we are too busy to bother with details, we are negating them; in short time, details will vanish. This seems to be occurring, though you may not be noticing.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
by huangism January 2, 2008 11:51 AM PST
first of all, this is an article by a salesman. second, at parties where huge speakers are needed, no one is really listening to the crisp sounds and the clearity of the vocals, they just want music they can listen to so they can dance. so no i am not sold, this article sounds like the desperate cry of a audio salesman
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
Click Here
  • About The Audiophiliac

  • Ex movie theater projectionist Steve Guttenberg has more or less successfully hitched his future to home theater, but he still pines for the clickity-clack of 35 MM projectors and all the stale popcorn he could eat. Between projectionist gigs he worked as a high-end audio salesman for sixteen years, and produced records for an audiophile label. Oh, and one more thing, nothing annoys Steve more than being confused with the other Steve Guttenberg, the washed-up Police Academy actor. The wordsmith Guttenberg is a frequent contributor to a number of magazines and websites including Home Theater, Stereophile, Robb Report Home Entertainment, and he does audio reviews for CNET.com. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

The Audiophiliac topics

advertisement
Click Here.
On TechRepublic: 10 ways users mess up their computers
Visit other CNET Networks sites: