November 7, 2007 7:42 AM PST

Listening to Music: A How-to Guide

Listen here

(Credit: Steve Guttenberg)

Listening comes naturally, doesn't it? Well sure, everyone with normal hearing can listen, but what do they hear? What I'm talking about is listening as a focused activity--as opposed listening where music serves as background to something else, reading, driving, running, working, or washing the dishes--active listening can be a lot more rewarding. You hear stuff in your favorite music, maybe rhythm guitar patterns, overdubbed vocals, or instruments you never knew were there can suddenly jump out of the mix. It's stuff the band may have put a huge effort into perfecting, that you only notice when you're really listening.

Bass drums and bass guitars can easily get lost when you're distracted, but they provide the very foundation of dance music and rock & roll. Paul McCartney's bass playing with the Beatles was amazing, and if you're really listening you'll hear every note. On acoustic jazz recordings you should be able to hear every pluck and slide.

Stereo imaging--the placement of instruments and vocals from left to right can be fascinating. Imaging is especially cool over headphones where it's all in your head. With speakers you can sometimes hear a sense of "space" surrounding each instrument. There might be spatial depth so some instruments sound like they're in front of other instruments. Over really good speakers you can almost "see" the musicians in front of the speakers.

The word "transparent" plays a key role in the audiophile lexicon and refers to the ability of components and speakers to disappear so you feel like you're hearing the original sound of the recording session. Of course, that's not literally true--transparency is a matter of degree. When everything's just right the heightened clarity lets you feel like you're getting closer to the true sound, and well, you feel closer to the music.

Just listening for these qualities will make you a better, more aware listener. One thing's for sure, the more you listen, the more you'll hear. And most importantly, you'll get more out of the music.

advertisement
 
Discover unlimited music for the price of one CD a month
Recent posts from The Audiophiliac
Subwoofer Setup Bass-ics
Subwoofer Setup Bass-ics: Part 2
Subwoofer Setup Bass-ics: Part 1
Shattering audiophile stereotypes
HDtracks: Why settle for iTunes now that you can get CD quality music downloads?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 9 comments (Page 1 of 1)
Unique to the Listener
by buzzvader November 7, 2007 8:50 AM PST
All of this is subjected to each individual's listening characteristics. It all depends on where you are and how you listen. I love Star Wars music,yet,to me, it sounded better on the CD I was listening to rather than hearing it played in a world class philharmonic hall by a world class orchestra. Go figure! The best stereo system I ever heard consisted of an Ampzilla amplifier played through a large set of Magneplanars on a Garrard turntable. The record was "Poetry Man" by Phoebe Snow. I swear I could hear her breathe all the words as well as her fingers sliding over the guitar strings. Nothing has ever sounded so good. If I were to hear her play it live or take that system home, it wouldn't have sounded the same. I actually think my Monsoon planar computer speakers sound better than most of my very good stereo equipment, which runs the gamut from Altec Lansing to JBl to Harman Kardon to Marantz to Advents to Rotel. You can spend a fortune or spend an average amount and nothing will sound the same to the reviewer or to the average listener.
Reply to this comment
Right On Steve!
by Johnny Mac 7 November 7, 2007 12:38 PM PST
I would ad one suggestion, try listening with your eyes closed. By eliminating the sense of vision you can heighten the aural experience and you might be surprised how much you can "see" with your eyes closed.
Reply to this comment
Subjective...but the basics are the basics
by ecyph November 7, 2007 1:59 PM PST
You have to appreciate the fact that Steve is talking about basic things to listen for which can enhance someone's experience with their music. Subjective as the result may be, the things to listen for are the same basic things. Granted 90% of the people reading this blog are already doing that, but it's still a good concept for a lot of the "MP3 generation" who may or may not understand this. In fact, the "mp3 generation" has really been cheated, because "lossy" formats just don't recreate the same experience as a vinyl record, or even a full "lossless" digital source. Listening to a lot of 128kbps mp3's is like listening to unadjusted Bose speakers for too long...your ear just gets tired (not to mention the fact that music is recorded with too much compression as it is) Anyway, I think Steve is making a great point here, and people who are active listeners are going to find more interesting things in their music.
Reply to this comment
I think it would be cool if...
by acardes November 7, 2007 8:10 PM PST
producers miked a session by using two microphones with an optimal field (super cardioid?) spaced 6" apart, to model the orientation of human ears. Then those of us that can't afford super high-end speakers might able to get an awesome listening experience with a set of good headphones and an amp. Then again, this might just be garbage... I don't know the first thing when it comes to producing.
Reply to this comment
In response to 'I think it would be cool if...'
by Fantastipotamus November 8, 2007 7:12 AM PST
Currently there are already people playing with recordings taken from inside a mock ear canal. The recordings are called 'Binaural', and often use microphones inside a 'dummy head'. To really hear the difference in recordings, Binaural.com says you'll likely need headphones, suggesting IEM's, but I've recreated them with normal closed Sennheisers, so regular headphones would likely work enough to illustrate the difference. I'm sure a high quality stereo would be able to recreate it well, however. There is more information available on Wikipedia.com (search for binaural), as well as a site with samples available, www.binaural.com which contain downloadable mp3s. It's quite an interesting experience to sit with your eyes closed and listen to someone talk to you from the front, then the side, and then back.
Reply to this comment
A lost art
by djcub00 November 8, 2007 9:42 AM PST
I remember talking with a friend of mine about this about a year ago. His older sister and her friends made a ritual of getting together when their favorite artist realeased a new album in the 1970's. They would gather and sit in between speakers, listening intently until it was finished. Maybe taking a break after flipping sides. I've always wanted to do the same thing...a record club just like a book club. Background noise at a party is fine, but some things I like to pay attention to. Thats when I really know if I like an artist or not.
Reply to this comment
Re: I think it would be cool if...
by sdbgtrman November 19, 2007 7:57 AM PST
Binaural recording is an awesome technique in the studio. I have a friend who took a dummy head and stuck two mics in the ears, and made his own binaural head. It's an awesome room sound, and if you are in a great recording space, it makes you feel like you are really there. It's one of those things that we in the studio love, but the listener almost never gets to experience. The biggest problem is that records you hear today are rarely played all together. Most of the time, they play the drums (and maybe bass) first, then overdub all the instruments one at a time after that. If you listen to country, a lot of that is played by a band all at once (with a few overdubs), but even then, the guitars are in an isolation booth, the piano is in another booth, etc. Really, the drums are the only thing that we get to hear in the room any more. I take that back, strings are an unforgettable experience to be in the room with on a recording session. If you ever get a chance to step into a string session to watch or listen, please do, it will change the way you look at musicians and music for the rest of your life. All that being said, setting up two mics in the room won't get you to hear the group as a band any more. It's a great idea, but with how polished everything is supposed to sound these days, getting a producer to put the people in a circle and just play is very very hard. Everyone has to have their isolation.
Reply to this comment
The 128 kbps music file
by cyberDJ November 23, 2007 3:49 PM PST
With the success of the commercial music file download (all vendors included here), you couldn't "listen" to the music if you tried. The 128 kbps bit rate removes so much of the music, you won't hear any nuances or subtleties. It's too bad that you can't easily download the ubiquitous .wav file. It's full fidelity, free of DRMs and it plays EVERYWHERE on ANYTHING. To this day, I buy CDs exclusively. I rip them into my media server as .wav files. I can then play them anywhere (car, home, nightclub or outdoors) without proprietary entanglements. Now, I can listen anywhere without fumbling with jewel cases.
Reply to this comment
by veer01 January 13, 2008 4:38 PM PST
I've got to be honest, since i bought my Microsoft Zune and my Brookstone Earbuds, im amazed i survived with my Sandisk Sansa. Even when I'm working out time just flies because of the details that i hear in the music. Keep in mind that i'm using 128k wma files here a lot of which i ri[pped from cd's at the slowest speeds and to be honest depending on the quality of the source even lower bitrate songs can sound great. I have numerous songs that sound the same as the recording on the original CD and audiophiles that i know even get fooled somtimes. As far as i can see, mp3 are useful but if ur serious about music, get aac or wma and a decent pair of logitechs or altec lancings if ur cheap. Compression isnt the only factor here.
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
Click Here
  • About The Audiophiliac

  • Ex movie theater projectionist Steve Guttenberg has more or less successfully hitched his future to home theater, but he still pines for the clickity-clack of 35 MM projectors and all the stale popcorn he could eat. Between projectionist gigs he worked as a high-end audio salesman for sixteen years, and produced records for an audiophile label. Oh, and one more thing, nothing annoys Steve more than being confused with the other Steve Guttenberg, the washed-up Police Academy actor. The wordsmith Guttenberg is a frequent contributor to a number of magazines and websites including Home Theater, Stereophile, Robb Report Home Entertainment, and he does audio reviews for CNET.com. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

The Audiophiliac topics

advertisement
On TechRepublic: Who made the worst PC ever?
Visit other CNET Networks sites: