April 5, 2008 12:17 PM PDT

Chinese social network QQ outperforms Facebook & Co.

(Credit: QQ)

I just returned from a trip to Shanghai, and in case you didn't know anyway, here's my No. 1 insight: China scales.

Let's take QQ.com as an example, the leading Chinese online social network. The site is reported to have more than 300 million active accounts. That is eight times the member base of Facebook--and it's the same size as the U.S. population.

What's also remarkable (and different from the Western social networks) is QQ's monetization. Facebook posted revenue of $150 million for 2007 (and according to Plus8star a loss of $50 million); MySpace.com (purchased by News Corp. for $560 million) is projected to generate $750 million in revenue this year; and Bebo (purchased by AOL for $850 million) had revenue of just $20 million in 2007. While QQ reported revenue of $523 million and an astonishing operating profit of $224 million in 2007. The revenue distribution is unusual, too: 60 percent of the revenue came from services like games, an additional 21 percent from mobile services like ringtones, and only 13 percent from online advertising.

Do added value services trump ad based revenue models?

advertisement
 
Discover unlimited music for the price of one CD a month
Recent posts from Matter/Anti-Matter
SFZero: A new interface for San Francisco
The future of business is social: notes from the Milken Global Conference
Design conversations, not products
Retro metro - the legendary New York subway map is back!
Rallying cry for innovation at Fortune Brainstorm Green and Milken Conference
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 1 comment (Page 1 of 1)
by csven April 8, 2008 1:26 PM PDT
"Do added value services trump ad based revenue models?" If you recall Sony and Microsoft's moves into virtual marketplaces and read some of the comments they made at the time, you get at least a few answers to your question. Personally, I think there's more than enough room for a variety of approaches. For reference: "Micropayments For Virtual Goods" - http://blog.rebang.com/?p=840 (includes additional links) "The (Sony) State of Virtual Goods" - http://blog.rebang.com/?p=1162 "Virtual Goods? the Movie" - http://blog.rebang.com/?p=1404
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About Matter/Anti-Matter

  • Tim Leberecht and Adam Richardson both work for frog design, a consulting firm specialized in designing innovative products and services for Fortune 500 clients. On the Matter / Anti-Matter blog, they engage in a debate around questions they face day-to-day in their work, using convergence/divergence as a lens through which to look at the pressing issues in business, culture, and technology. What makes a successful convergent product or a successful divergent innovation? Is convergence a myth that users don't really care about, or is the current state of convergence just not satisfying enough for them to embrace? How much divergence of innovation is good, and when does it just become confusing? How do you stay on top of people's ever changing needs and wants?

    They are members of the CNET Blog Network and are not employees of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN
advertisement
On MovieTome: SEX AND THE CITY clips are here!
Visit other CNET Networks sites: