• On GameSpot: Wii Fit tells 10-year-old she's fat
August 26, 2008 8:17 AM PDT

Canon wises up with 50D sensor and new zoom

Posted by Stephen Shankland
  • Font size
  • Print

My coworker Lori Grunin already covered Canon's announcement of its $1,400 mid-range EOS 50D SLR, but as somebody who's in the market for a new SLR, I thought I'd weigh in with some thoughts of my own. I'm glad Canon is investing where perhaps it counts most: the sensor. If the reviews look good, this will be the first time I've really been tempted to upgrade from my well-used Canon Rebel XT.

Canon's EOS 50D

Canon's EOS 50D will ship in October for $1,399, not including a lens. Also shown here is the new EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS zoom lens.

(Credit: Canon)

When it ships in October, the 50D will sport a 15.1 megapixel sensor, up from 10.1 megapixels in the current 40D. The increase in megapixels is nice for the poster-print and microstock-sales crowds, but what's most notable is the increase of the top ISO from 3,200 to 12,800.

That means Canon has done some serious work to cut down on the noise levels inside the sensor, which bodes well for image quality not just at the new extremes but also at more ordinary sensitivity settings. ISO 3,200, for example, is now part of the ordinary range, not the extended range that must be manually enabled before it's available. Canon hit some sweet spots in sensor design, for example with its earlier 20D and the full-frame 5D, and the 50D holds the potential of being another model that balances megapixels with low noise and accurate color.

Canon attributes the advance to "newly designed gapless microlenses over each pixel to reduce noise." Microlenses gather light for the light-sensitive part of the image sensor, compensating for surface area occupied by other electronics. Gapless microlenses presumably stretch across the entire pixel width. Perhaps this technology will also help out whatever model will succeed Canon's 5D, my other obvious upgrade path but one that likely would require spending twice the price for the camera body and that would require me to shell out another few hundred dollars for a new wide-angle lens to support the full-frame sensor size.

Fending off Nikon
Higher sensitivity is important for Canon. It's been losing market share to Nikon, which has pushed high sensitivity as an advantage, though with lower megapixel counts. The full-frame sensors on Nikon's D3 and D700 can reach ISO 25,600, though reaching that level was made easier through a sensor design that emphasizes a smaller number of larger pixels.

The 50D has some other features that sound promising, including a higher-resolution 3-inch display, the new Digic 4 image-processing chip, a more dust-repellant sensor coating to avoid image-degrading speckles, HDMI (High-Definition Multimedia Interface) output for nicer output on high-definition TVs, and the higher-speed UDMA CompactFlash standard. It's also got a built-in database of lens characteristics that can help correct for vignetting, the darker corners that some lenses produce.

Photography buffs who know their way around a $1,400 SLR may sneer at dummy modes for portrait, macro, and sports shots, or the new Creative Auto Mode (CA) that offers photographers English-language options such as "blur the background" and sets the camera accordingly. I think that's shortsighted, though: even if you know how to best balance depth of field and shutter speed, perhaps somebody else in your family doesn't. My complaint with the automatic settings is that at least in my camera, they only permit shooting in JPEG. I prefer raw, and even if somebody else is shooting, I'm usually the one who processes the images. (Update Oct. 9: The 50D can shoot raw even in the automatic modes. Huzzah! Another big advantage over my Rebel XT.)

Two areas concern me, though.

First is live view. Canon claims its latest attempt is better, but I remain skeptical it'll match the expectations of those with point-and-shoot cameras who've grown accustomed to framing the shots through the display rather than the viewfinder. Focusing sluggishness and pauses while a mirror flips up and down have seriously degraded live view on most SLRs.

The Canon 50D's sensor

The heart of Canon's 50D is this 15.1 megapixel sensor, whose increased sensitivity now reaches ISO 12,800.

(Credit: Canon)

It doesn't bother me much, since I'm happy with the viewfinder. But I have friends who demand it, and I do see its utility for taking shots while holding the camera overhead or low to the ground. Live view also is nice when you want to talk to photographic subjects rather than hide your face behind the camera.

A more personal concern is weather sealing. I'm careful with my cameras, but I shoot sometimes in light rain, San Francisco mizzle, or waterfall spray. And on hiking and camping trips, dust is a serious concern. Full weather sealing is expensive, but it's an area where Canon competitors have been leading the charge, and it's important to me.

Finally, a modern Canon ultrazoom
Another smart Canon countermove to Nikon is the EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS lens, costing $700 and also due in October.

With a zoom range that long, you can bet the lens will have some serious compromises in areas such as sharpness, vignetting, distortion that can bow parallel lines into a barrel shape, or the chromatic aberration that can leave colored fringes around object edges. But that won't matter much to the large fraction of SLR buyers who don't want the expense, hassle, and bulk of multiple lenses. Nikon's 18-200mm lens has been its best-selling ever, despite a similarly steep price tag and highly limited initial availability.

It's probably not the lens for me, but I know several people waiting for something of its ilk, so Canon is smart to offer it. I'd probably rather put $700 toward a big telephoto lens if I were in a lavish spending mood.

Even then, I confess this all-purpose model is tempting for the next seven-day backpacking trip or Argentina tour when lugging lots of lenses is a huge effort. I have no such ambivalence with the 50D, though. It's aimed squarely at photography enthusiasts such as myself, and you can bet I'll be poring over the reviews to see if the 50D performance matches the promise of the press release.

Stephen Shankland covers Google, Yahoo, search, online advertising, portals, digital photography, and related subjects. He joined CNET News in 1998 and since then also has covered servers, supercomputing, open-source software, and science. E-mail Stephen.
Recent posts from Underexposed
Microsoft gets a better answer to Flickr
Attention geotaggers: Nikon GP-1 going on sale
Photo world begins grappling with video SLRs
Picasa chief departs Google for Fetch
Sony, Olympus SLRs await Adobe camera profiles
Photoshop supports 5D Mark II, camera profiles
DxO sheds light on camera sensor performance
First Look video: Picoli for iPhone
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 27 comments
by IcyNeko August 26, 2008 9:42 AM PDT
This article is rather misleading.

The boost in megapixels does mean much if the image processing is shoddy. If the sensor/image processing firmware sucks, then it just means your poster print will have more artifacts.

As for the "higher iso = canon does serious work in noise reduction".... that's not a factual statement. Tons of other manufacturers sport higher iso factors, but their noise is unbearable. Higher ISO has more to do with the sensor than anything else.

Now, Canon has a good reputation for great image processing, and likely this will be reflected in the quality of the 50D. Fine. But if posts are misleading, people may buy cameras for entirely the wrong reason and spend money/time/energy wastefully.
Reply to this comment
by sevort August 27, 2008 10:17 AM PDT
"Tons of other manufacturers sport higher iso factors, but their noise is unbearable." You, obviously, haven't tried the latest Nikon gear...
by megachand August 26, 2008 10:05 AM PDT
Canon's 50D might be promising with 3" 920,000 pixel screen but Nikon has been there already with 3.0" 922,000 pixel on their D300 and upper models. The specs comes from dpreview.
Reply to this comment
by thomrebe August 26, 2008 11:14 AM PDT
Nikon's D300 though an older camera is rated over 2500$ vs. the brand new canon 50D being less than that even though a much newer camera. I think its a little idiotic to compare the two because lets face it: Nikon doesn't really make anything for startup DSLR photographers (especially students like me)
by IcyNeko August 26, 2008 12:59 PM PDT
Reply to thomrebe:
I'd hardly call the D300 old considering it just came out end of last year, and costs $1600 for body. It is totally comparable.

And for the record, Nikon makes plenty of cameras for starting students. For non-students, the D40X is great. I started on the D50 and know other photography students who started on D50's. The D80 is another low-cost alternative for beginners. And now Nikon's D60 can also be considered beginner material.

I think your statement was a bit shallow and one sided.
by cps08 October 5, 2008 3:32 PM PDT
To IcyNeko,

Most everything you say is valid but at the end you say...

"I think your statement was a bit shallow and one sided.", which to me is ironic since that was exactly how I felt about your first comment.

You were the first to make a comment and you tried so hard to not sound bias and one sided but from beginning to end you made it obvious that you had an agenda. I didn't know you were a Nikon user till this 2nd posting you made, but I pretty much assumed you were from your first post.

Its funny how you're criticizing others when you were the first to make a bias comment :).
by husky91 August 26, 2008 11:19 AM PDT
I don't think you can necessarily assume that the boost in sensitivity means they have reduced noise. They're really unrelated. It sounds like they've made an effort to reduce noise, but in also increasing the pixel count by 50%, that could be a tall order.
Reply to this comment
by IcyNeko August 26, 2008 12:18 PM PDT
Very true, and if they didn't do a good enough job to really improve image processing, the increase in pixel count will end up in even more distortions. Instead of having a crisp image on a poster, you'll get a large poster full of blocky pixels.
by Shankland August 27, 2008 6:52 AM PDT
In the very competitive SLR market, you can bet that Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus, Panasonic, Pentax, etc., will put the highest ISO they possibly can on a camera, and the ISO limit is from noise. Canon specifically said they got 1.5 stops more sensitivity with the new sensor. And you're right that increasing the pixel count *and* sensitivity is a tall order; that Canon claims to have done both is the reason I found the camera promising and why I wrote this post in the first place. Next step is the reviews, though, so see if Canon really did do what they promised.
by jasonschlachter August 26, 2008 11:35 AM PDT
I never understood the rush to higher megapixels in these prosumer DSLR models. I'd take more features and better quality photographs (i.e. sensitivity) over megapixels given the more than adequate amount of pixels already on the 40D.
Reply to this comment
by Shankland August 27, 2008 6:59 AM PDT
You're not alone. I agree with you--I'm far more often constrained by available light than I am by sufficient megapixels--and so did 94 percent of people who responded to a poll I ran earlier on the subject:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-9858266-39.html

More megapixels is often nice, but you're right that it comes at a price. It baffles me that consumers are still so fixated on megapixels, but I do think they're slowly getting more clever. The difference between 2 megapixels and 4 megapixels matters a lot more than the difference between 12 and 14, and people who see the vastly better images produced by a 6-megapixel Nikon D40 compared to a higher-end 12-megapixel compact camera are getting clued in.

Nikon's was bold and gutsy to stick with 12 megapixels for the full-frame D3 and D700, letting the company push to the market-leading ISO 25,600. No doubt they'll eventually come up with some high-megapixel model that works better under studio lighting conditions where ISO 200 is fine, but I give them credit for setting the agenda.
by sqjaw August 26, 2008 12:07 PM PDT
I agree with the writer as to Canon's lack to produce a Weather sealed camera for the same price of the EOS50D or the price of the Pentax K20D or the other manufactures that have such a camera, I did not buy a 30D nor a 40D nor will I buy a EOS 50D because its not weather sealed, If I have to I will change ships , I started with canon with The F-1 and have stayed with them but their loseing ground as far as I am concerned:
Reply to this comment
by proudpidoy August 26, 2008 12:18 PM PDT
I just hope that the new CMOS sensor and DIGIC 4 image-processor chip can produce better images than its predecessor.
Reply to this comment
by codocee August 26, 2008 12:22 PM PDT
Hows your computer for handling 21mp files, especially the raw stuff. Leaves me out for now but thats OK...5D works fine.
Reply to this comment
by codocee August 26, 2008 12:25 PM PDT
Sorry,

I was thinking 5D replacement
Reply to this comment
by why do i need a name? August 26, 2008 1:15 PM PDT
RE: megachand

To say that sensitivity and noise are unrelated is a bit simplistic. There are two things that you can do to increase the "sensitivity" of a sensor:

1: lower the noise floor such that the signal to noise ratio goes up (ie: lower the background noise)
2: increase the quantum efficiency in the photon-to-charge conversion (ie: increase the signal for a given number of photons)

There are lots of tricks to deal with both of them, and again lots of noise sources to take care of. The highest performance CCD's in the world have very low noise floors, measured in electrons by the way.

As was mentioned in the article, one of the ways that they're doing this is through microlenses. Given that some portion of the "pixel" has to be dedicated to non photo-sensitive stuff (especially in CMOS devices) having a microlens that can take the light from that portion of the sensor and focus it onto the photo-sensitive device is a good idea. In forming the lenses though, a "gap" had to be formed in the material between pixels to allow them to form right. Having a gapless process will allow more of the non-photo-sensitive area to be "focused" onto the sensitive area, thus an increased signal.

But, I'll bet that there is more to it than that given what they're doing.
Reply to this comment
by djacobow1 August 26, 2008 2:23 PM PDT
An earlier commenter said that just because they raised the max ISO doesn't mean they did so because noise is better controlled. But this is Canon introducing a prosumer camera, and it is not in their interest to introduce "garbage" ISO settings. My guess is that noise will, in fact, be better and the IQ will be excellent, esp. w.r.t. similar priced models from other manufacturers. In any case, we'll know better in the upcoming days and weeks as reviews and tests trickle out.

I think it's an interesting upgrade. Now, I wonder how improved the AF will be! I'm happy to see the AF microadjustment feature has trickled down from the xD's.

However, like SS, I'm going to see what the upcoming FF model will be like (and cost) before I make any new photographic investments.
Reply to this comment
by RainCaster August 27, 2008 7:39 AM PDT
Has Canon added manual mirror control yet? Without that feature, it's not worth my $$ to upgrade.
Reply to this comment
by d_marc_brown August 27, 2008 7:47 AM PDT
re: your comments on the "dummy modes" and storing as jpegs

With the 50D, you can save images taken with the "dummy modes" as RAW files.

This definitely a winner for a lot of us.
Reply to this comment
by WayneBirch August 27, 2008 9:48 PM PDT
This was a great intro of the new 50D. Thanks for posting it, Stephen.
It's good to get digital news from other than 'regular' places. I've waited years for Canon
to produce a 15MP camera with a great new sensor and I almost went Nikon. My 'old 300D'
has done what it could as far as being pushed for larger printing photography and general
photography. Canon seems to have listened to users and responded to Nikon's great stuff
lately. Thank you Nikon. I'm glad I waited for the 50D.
Reply to this comment
by FOS2007 August 27, 2008 10:27 PM PDT
With my Digital Rebel (the first one!) starting to have issues with it's part-way focus button, I'm looking at a new body like the 40D, and now the 50D (need something to match my 100-400 white lens! LOL!). While I'm strictly an amateur shooting for the love of it (and for my daughter's sports events), the 50D is probably overkill for me but thankfully, will now push the price down of the 40D...yeah!
Reply to this comment
by bas2000 August 28, 2008 7:02 AM PDT
Will the 50D record video ?
Reply to this comment
by kwhsy82 August 28, 2008 8:29 AM PDT
I just read the Nikon review in the NY Times. I think the video on that camera sounds pretty killer. I'd love at times to switch into video mode with my lenses.

And yes, I agree with the others: higher ISO doesn't mean less noise necessarily, but one would hope that Canon isn't upping the ISO without commensurate noise reduction..
Reply to this comment
by Special(e) September 16, 2008 7:42 AM PDT
"Finally a modern canon ultra zoom"

Huh?
Canon has been making the 28-300 for years now...
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/319784-GREY/Canon_9322A002AA_28_300mm_f_3_5_5_6L_IS_USM.html
Reply to this comment
by webj September 24, 2008 10:57 PM PDT
I'm certainly not a pro, but I love shooting. My dilemma is do I go for the 15 megs (pending reviews), or do I try to pick up a price-reduced 5D with full frame 12 megs (assuming that prices will reduce with the 5/mk 2 coming)?
Reply to this comment
by cps08 October 5, 2008 3:24 PM PDT
It depends on your need the Canon 50D is going to help if you're shooting wild life and other type of photography where you need a zoom, and fast fps. The 50D will probably still be cheaper the the 5D when the 5D replacement is launched in late November. From my sources the original 5D will sell at a reduced price of $1799 which is 400 more then the 50D.

Make a list of goals you want to achieve with your photography and maybe go to your local camera store and see what they recommend. Also look at the lenses you think you'll need and how much you can spend on them and which manufacturer will give you better options. You can also get adapters that allow you to use a different manufacturers' lenses as well.

I wouldn't ask for too much advice here, it seems like the first few posts are pretty bias against canon and the factual data is not too accurate. They're comparing $1700 Nikons to $1400 Canons, claiming its comparable etc., I don't think it'll help you any. Both Nikon and Canon have great cameras to offer you, as well as Sony.

Best wishes on finding the right one.
by jordanjanine November 7, 2008 9:07 PM PST
Hello, I am new to the photography business, and I have been shooting wedding and reunions with my rebel xti I have the top of the line lenses, and I am now getting ready to buy a new upgraded camera, I was thinking the canon 40 D, my husband says the canon 50D is the way to go........ I want to use my rebel as my back up, and I want the really expensive lenses I have purchased to match up with my new camera..... where do I go, what do you think?? Thanks so much for any advice.
Janine
Reply to this comment
 See all 27 Comments >>
advertisement

In the news now

Slowing expectations at a green-tech start-up

Six months ago, biofuels start-up Mascoma had the wind in its sails, as did the rest of the clean-tech sector. Now, the company is treading carefully and scaling back.


With JavaFX, Sun seeks new coders, new revenue

With the launch of JavaFX 1.0, Sun is trying to reclaim Java's strength as a foundation for rich Internet applications. But it's no longer the incumbent.


Tim Lincecum, motion capture star

San Francisco Giants pitcher, who won the Cy Young award last month, dons a motion capture suit for 2K Sports' Major League Baseball 2K9 video game.


About Underexposed

This blog sheds light on digital photography subjects such as cameras, photo editing, and Web sites. Shankland joined CNET News in 1998 after a five-year stint as a science writer. He's a lab rat who grew up in Los Alamos, N.M., and graduated from Harvard.

Contact Stephen at Stephen.Shankland@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Underexposed topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right