• On MovieTome: CAPTAIN AMERICA was in THE HULK?!?
March 14, 2008 8:40 AM PDT

What makes the most valuable tech companies so valuable?

Posted by Steve Tobak
  • Font size
  • Print

How do we value technology companies? Ingenuity and invention, quality of service, brand loyalty, manufacturing muscle, operating efficiency, supply-chain management, price, great place to work. There are lots of metrics.

For those unfamiliar with the wily ways of Wall Street, the stock market has its own way of expressing what it thinks of companies. It's called market capitalization or market cap for short.

Market cap is calculated by multiplying a company's share price by its total number of shares outstanding. There are other metrics for company fundamentals-- earnings per share, free cash flow, P/E or price-to-earnings ratio--but market cap has become an established indicator of market value.

I used market cap to determine the 10 most valuable technology companies. I stuck with electronics. If I hadn't, then Genentech would have replaced Qualcomm in the 10th spot. And since AT&T and other telecom companies are now just service providers--as opposed to the old days--they're out of the picture too.

So what makes these companies so valuable, at least to the market? Well, the obvious answer is their ability to consistently grow revenue and profits over time. On that, we can all agree.

Beyond that, however, there just doesn't seem to be much commonality. That came as a real surprise to me. I mean, wouldn't you expect to see a common thread or two, or at least a few with the same business model? I sure did.

Think about it. In the old days, the most valued companies were vertically integrated big-iron computer and telecom firms. They developed all their own software and hardware, they had their own research labs, they did everything. And they were all essentially similar.

Then came the personal computer and the industry disaggregated into companies specializing in chips (Intel), software (Microsoft), PCs (IBM, HP, Compaq, Dell), and networks (Cisco). Still, they were all part of the same industry.

Finally, we saw the rise of cell phones, consumer devices, and the Internet. That, I think, is when the industry really began to diversify. The dot-com bust and the dark years that followed just reshuffled the deck and brought Internet and network companies back down to earth.

Today, the top 10 list features a mix of products and services; hardware and software; enterprise and consumer; computers, communications and consumer electronics; network and Internet...there's some of everything.

And while these firms do have certain overlapping businesses, no two firms have the same business model, at least in terms of their primary revenue and profit-generating businesses.

I wonder, though, how long it will stay that way. Will the technology industry reaggregate? Is that even a word? Will there come a time when half the top valued technology companies are into robotics, virtual reality, or space exploration?

Your guess is as good as mine.

Steve Tobak is managing partner of Invisor Consulting LLC. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Recent posts from Train Wreck
Wonder why everything isn't speech controlled?
Survey links CEO approval to stock performance
Making sense of reorgs
Meetings suck, but they don't have to
Far out technology for the geek in all of us
How many strikes before a tech CEO is out?
The alternative-energy bubble
Corporate governance is a myth
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 2 comments
by Mugunth March 14, 2008 12:12 PM PDT
One common thing is that, majority of the top 10 companies are monopolistic in some way or the other. M$, everyone knows, IBM is technology services, cisco in routers, google in search and nokia in mobile phones, Intel in Chips, Oracle in Database, Apple and their mysterious iPod. HP is given a tough competition by Dell. I've no idea about qualcomm though.
Reply to this comment
by praveent99 March 14, 2008 6:19 PM PDT
Is Generating Profits the only common factor ? Then are other non IT related companies generating profits consistently. It can't be.

I think, the common factor for success of these companies is Focus , Innovation and Smart execution. These features did not exist in olden day giants. Profit is a by product .

The more focussed you are, the less gaps you leave for your competitors to fill in.
Just compare Google to Yahoo or Google to Microsoft [in search].

Trying to BE ALL is gone. Now it is just BE GOOD and stay on TOP.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

In the news now

Slowing expectations at a green-tech start-up

Six months ago, biofuels start-up Mascoma had the wind in its sails, as did the rest of the clean-tech sector. Now, the company is treading carefully and scaling back.


With JavaFX, Sun seeks new coders, new revenue

With the launch of JavaFX 1.0, Sun is trying to reclaim Java's strength as a foundation for rich Internet applications. But it's no longer the incumbent.


Tim Lincecum, motion capture star

San Francisco Giants pitcher, who won the Cy Young award last month, dons a motion capture suit for 2K Sports' Major League Baseball 2K9 video game.


Resource center from CNET News sponsors
Business. Ready.
Sony VAIO® Professional PCs.

Click Here!
A new grade in mobility demands a new kind of notebook. And Sony delivers.Tough, portable and featuring up to 7.5 hours of battery life! VAIO® Professional notebooks are built for business. Learn more.

Click Here!
Built tough for business.

Learn more about the rigorous quality testing Sony puts its notebooks through.

Protect your investment.

Find out why VAIO® tech support recently won a Laptop Editors' Choice Award, July 2008.

Long battery life.

Up to 7.5 hours of battery life! See how VAIO® PCs will keep you productive longer when on the road.

Travel light

Check out our ultraportable line-up, starting at 2.87 lbs.

PCs for every need.

Find out which VAIO® notebook is right for you.

About Train Wreck

Steve Tobak is a marketing consultant and former chip industry executive. Train Wreck provides insight into dysfunctional corporate behavior, among other things. When he's not airing the industry's dirty laundry, Steve likes to hang around the house, make believe he's working, and drive his wife crazy. Find out more at www.invisor.net or email Steve at trainwreck@invisor.net. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Train Wreck topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right