PEOPLE the battery life appears less because YOU CAN'T PUT THE DAMNED THING DOWN.
That would pretty much explain it.
Mythical beast and rumormonger extraordinaire, the Macalope writes about all things Apple for the CNET Blog Network. Read more at The Macalope: An Apple blog. He is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Six months ago, biofuels start-up Mascoma had the wind in its sails, as did the rest of the clean-tech sector. Now, the company is treading carefully and scaling back.
With the launch of JavaFX 1.0, Sun is trying to reclaim Java's strength as a foundation for rich Internet applications. But it's no longer the incumbent.
San Francisco Giants pitcher, who won the Cy Young award last month, dons a motion capture suit for 2K Sports' Major League Baseball 2K9 video game.
Born of the earth, forged in fire, the Macalope was branded "nonstandard" and "proprietary" by the IT world and considered a freak of nature. Part man, part Mac, and part antelope, the Macalope set forth on a quest to save his beloved platform. Long-eclipsed by his more prodigious cousin, the jackalope (they breed like rabbits, you know), the Macalope's time has come. Apple news and rumormonger extraordinaire, the Macalope provides a uniquely polymorphic approach. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Business Tech
Second Firefox 3.1 beta due 'very shortly'Mozilla is on the verge of another salvo in the browser wars. One big feature in Firefox 3.1 beta 2: background processes called Web workers.
Gallery
Photos: Capturing a Cy Young winner's 'freaky' motionSan Francisco Giants pitcher Tim Lincecum lets loose during a motion-capturing session for the new Major League Baseball 2K9 video game.
Digital Noise: Music and Tech
Yes, Apple should sell a $99 iPhoneIt's just a rumor at this point, but a $99 iPhone could help Apple dominate the market for consumer smartphones before the competition has a chance to catch up.
Coop's Corner
Trouble in Java Land?Maybe the debut of JavaFX will be the game changer that Sun hopes for. But the fragmentation in the mobile world won't make it easy.
Video
A toast to online wine
Wireless
A closer look at Nokia's would-be iPhone killerNokia's new N97 touch-screen phone is full of cool features and functionality, but its design and unimpressive touch screen don't live up to Apple's iPhone.
Video
Wi-Fi while you fly
Politics and Law
Google lashes out at D.C. critic over 'payola punditry'Scott Cleland is paid by AT&T, Comcast, Verizon, and others to assail Google, which he does on a daily basis. Now his adversary has fought back, at least a little.
Green Tech
Ta ta, TeslaAre the Valley-based VCs and big-wigs who back Tesla Motors really serious about asking the federal government for low-interest loans?
Gallery
Photos: Space station marks a decade aloftThe first pieces of the International Space Station went into orbit 10 years ago. Now a full-fledged lab facility, it continues to grow.
iPod accessories
Westone 3 True-Fit Earphones sound superbThe Westone 3 True-Fit Earphones feature top-of-the-line sound to go with their top-of-the-line price tag; they should be a top choice for audiophiles who desire ultraportable headphones.
Green Tech
Laser printers don't emit harmful toner dust, study saysContrary to earlier reports, a new study shows that laser printers don't emit much toner into the air, although they can still pose health hazards.
Tethering costs $30/month--on any 3G AT&T phone--which means only a small percentage of iPhone users would use it, and those that did would be compensating AT&T quite well for the extra bandwidth. Therefore, I doubt AT&T needs to limit it in the long run. Maybe for a short time, though, since they've just made 3G changes. Either way, that's nothing to do with Apple.
Now, that small percentage of people would love to have it, and it's not hard to guess why the don't have the option--yet. We know already that Apple's iPhone team's time has all been spent on developers lately--which is a great thing that benefits a lot more users than tethering would. And as a result, Apple has admitted to having additional iPhone software features that just couldn't be read for 2.0 (with vague mention of copy/paste and driving-specific GPS functions).
Those features could come at any time by software update, all at once or one by one. I certainly hope tethering is one of them, and would be very surprised if that doesn't appear by MWSF.
If, in all of this, any sane person can sit down with a Windows Mobile device, and an iPhone, and believe that Microsoft is anything but light years behind, then they are letting their feelings cloud their reason to an impressive degree.
And jlgilkey is a bit behind: someone HAS come up with an app to do tethering on an iPhone. You can do it right now if you like. It's unofficial, and it's taking a $30 services from AT&T for free--something against the terms you agreed to when you signed your AT&T contract. So I'd suggest waiting for official tethering, and paying the extra $30 just like all those "delighted" Windows Mobile users ;)
(Yes, that would be the same Windows Mobile that has more devices in use than the iPhone, has been around for far longer, has been driven by a desktop and office monopoly.... and yet STILL has only a FRACTION of the iPhone's web usage. Sites track these things, and iPhone users dominate the usage of the Web from mobile phones. Because the iPhone and its browser are that much better and easier than Windows Mobile. A difficult pill for some, but undeniable.)
The downside is--I LOVE THE iPHONE! I bought one and (horrors) unlocked it. Even seriously considered paying the ETF and going back to AT&T again. The problem is that my Wing, although it pales in comparison, has better battery life and with the 8gb microsd card and win mobile player, it gets the music job done too. Even with bluetooth on, the wing charge lasts all day (most days.) WIth the iPHone, which, again, I like WAY more, it lasts 2-3 hours with bluetooth on and music playing. DEFEATS THE POINT OF HAVING AN IPOD!
Apple has put a chokehold on this phone. Let's start:
1. No ability add memory.
2. No ability to change battery.
3. No ability to send/rec files via bluetooth to/from another bluetooth device. (Even my crappy nokia 6100 does that)
4. Doesn't play WMA files. And NO, I can't convert them. I want to listen to live streams. WMA accounts for half the live streams on the net.
5. No tethering. I am willing to pay the $30, which I currently do with my Treo 750. Not a serious business phone. Tethering is important.
6. Apple controls all the software. Windows Mobile and Symbian, you can get software from anywhere, and there is much more software available.
7. No access to the file system without jailbreak.
Don't get me wrong, I think its a pretty cool phone though. But some of you guys need to climb down the tree and look at reality. All those features that the iphone does can be done with most Windows mobile and Symbian phones too.
Look at Apple's tv commercials:
Wow! I can check the weather on my iphone - Big deal! Even phones from 10 years ago could do that.
Wow! I can browse the internet. Every phone on the market today gives you internet access.
Wow! I can listen to music - Most phones can offer this too, although the iphone does a better job, except for the fact that Itunes stinks!
Apple just does a much better job of marketing these features. They make it seem like they invented the wheel, and many people beleive it.
In general, Apple users are just kidding themselves when they believe they have the best stuff. Sure Leopard is a pretty good operating system, but look what you're running it on. The cheapest Mac Mini's are the price of quad-core PC's nowadays. If Apple were to release Leopard for PC's, they might loose some of their Mac sales, but think about how many people would be throwing Windows away and switching over. The profits would outweigh the losses. I'm ashamed to admit that I simply don't care for Apple, first it was AOL now it's Apple. More then the company I really disagree with the majority of it's customers that have this "You use a PC? your soooo a sheep of the government"-type of attitude. To me Apple is a company that takes a concept, makes it somewhat idiot proof (I've seen my fair share of broken iPods) and calls it revolutionary. Afterwards we have the army of zombies claiming individuality left and right with the strong need to buy what everyone else is buying..... yes my friend your truly one of a kind. Face it guys, the only thing Apple has ever done worthwhile was OS X and the iPod(and they've done a pretty crappy job making it mandatory iTunes and way overpriced).
@posershadow
ROFL
Bonus points for no mention of battery life. Way to keep on topic.
Sent from my iPhone
It's fun to watch them recite their little MCSE talking points, isn't it?
1. iPod: Overpriced compared to the rest of the mp3 players in the market and yet it lacks features that the other mp3 players have. Also, a big problem I see with it is that iTunes is mandatory. I really don't like being forced into proprietary stuff, I simply want an iPod to hook up to a computer through a simple mini-USB cable that you can get from any store for a few bucks and then have the iPod show up on any computer, Mac or PC, as a USB flash drive would, that way I can drag and drop my music or movies on without having to use any program whatsoever, just like you do with a flash drive. iTunes maybe a good program for some, but it should not be mandatory, and should be an option for consumers to use for media management. I like the iPods stylish design, but the higher prices and mandatory iTunes really pushes me away.
2. Macs: These are interesting because Apple really puts a lot of effort into creating an innovative and stylish computer and it really pays off. They separate themselves from PC's here in a major way. Mac Minis are excellent for their small form factor, iMacs are great in the fact that they look amazing and they contain the whole computer in the monitor, and the Mac Pro is a very stylish way of putting server power into consumers hands. But there is a major downside to all of this and it's the price. The cheapest Mac Mini is the price of a 2.4ghz quad core PC with 3GB of RAM and 500GB hard drive. iMacs are far overpriced as well, considering that same quad core PC for $600 with a 22" monitor comes out to be around $850. And the Mac Pro, if you were to build a PC version of it, it would cost around $800 less than the Mac Pro. The next flaw is the lack of upgrades and availability to build your own system. iMacs and Mac Minis are just plain impossible to upgrade. The Mac Pro is upgradeable in a really cool way, but having to spend $2800 just to get a system that is upgradeable isn't worth it to me. There also aren't enough versions of Macs for people who are just looking for an ordinary tower for cheap with some power under the hood. Either you get the underpowered iMac, or you spend another $1k to bump into a Mac Pro. Mainly on Macs, I'd like to see a lot more versions of Macs, cheaper prices equivalent to the prices of equal PC setups, the ability to buy parts to build your own Mac, and a bigger push in the upgrade market so you can upgrade your Mac without having to go out and buy a Mac Pro.
3. Leopard: Great operating system. Probably one of the best out there. Only major issue here is that you cannot install it on a PC legally. Microsoft has allowed their OS to be installed on any machine, why won't Apple release theirs? If you think about it, sure they might loose some Mac sales, but think of how many people would throw Vista away and switch to Leopard. I think the pros outweigh the cons here. Basically, Apple needs to release Leopard for the world to enjoy, instead of forcing you to buy a Mac. Microsoft releases Office and their OS for Macs and Linux is completely open, now why can't Apple do the same?
4. iPhone: The iPhone is great. It takes the Windows Mobile devices of the past and shapes all of that technology into a more user friendly form. It is also displays Apples love to make things stylish. But the major issues are the required contract and the mandatory iTunes. It is far too expensive due to the required contract. Consumers should have a free choice to sign up for whatever they can afford. They should not make the iPhone a prize of only those who can afford the hefty contract. Again, look at the pros and cons of opening up the iPhone. Sure you won't be selling many of those high priced contracts anymore but you are going to sell a hell of a lot more iPhones now that anybody can get their hands on one. Also, iTunes, this should be optional. In Windows Mobile, with a MicroSD card, you can basically put any music, movies, or documents on your device with the same method you would a flash drive. Drag and drop and its on your device, no programs to mess with, only 2 mouse clicks. iTunes maybe good for some people, but not everybody wants to use iTunesProprietary stuff is just a hassle and a way to make more money off of people.
If Apple followed some of the tips I just gave, they would destroy Microsoft and the PC market in no time at all. They have the right products, they just need to make some modifications and they would definitely gain a lot more of my support.