Sorry, but Apple can't do everything right
Some people want us to believe that Apple doesn't do anything wrong. In fact, those same people usually believe that each and every product Apple has ever created has easily surpassed the quality and beauty of all of its competitors. Surely they would like you to forget the Apple Newton and the '90s, and invariably they'll forget that the company's Apple TV is hardly a success.
But alas, this is not meant to be an indictment of Apple or its cult-like following. Instead, it's an indictment on how ludicrous some of the claims flying around Apple truly are. How many times are we forced to endure the inexcusable lack of common sense as it pertains to Apple's future before someone stands up and says that enough is enough?
And while I may expect that sort of reaction from some of the Mac faithful, I certainly wouldn't expect it from a reputable firm. But after reading through the Forrester Research speculation piece, I can't help but wonder what the analysts were thinking. Do they honestly believe that a company that has gone out of its way to develop elite products will really release a picture frame?
Steve Jobs may be good, but he's not that good.
Now, before I get into the speculation, I should say that Forrester is guessing what Apple may have up its sleeve going forward and it did present a roadmap that would take it out to 2013. But if you apply logic to some of its predictions, I seriously doubt even the most outrageous Apple zealot will agree with most of them.
The great photo frame
Huh? They can't be serious, right? An Apple photo frame? Gee, now that sounds like something that Steve Jobs would release. Let's see -- iPhone, iPod, MacBook Pro, Apple TV, digital photo frame?
Forrester thinks it'll connect to iPhoto or other online image services and could be a staple in your living room. I think Forrester is totally off its rocker.
Wake up with Apple!
Picture yourself snoozing in your Batman PJs. Now picture yourself being woken up by the voice of Steve Jobs himself thanks to Apple clock radio. Doesn't that sound simply wonderful?
According to Forrester, the Apple clock radio will connect to iTunes and before you know it, you'll be woken up to one of the songs in your library. Sounds too much like an alarm clock with an iPod dock to me. My guess? No way.
A sophisticated remote control
This is probably one of the few that makes any sense. Forrester thinks Apple may want to release a sophisticated remote control that lets you walk around the house and flip through your iTunes library on the fly. According to the company, it can see it becoming a staple in just about any room and should connect to your home network. Even better, it'll play shows, movies, or songs through Apple-branded speakers.
Some may say that Apple won't want to get into this game because of its penchant for more simple products, but I think it makes some sense. The universal remote control business is booming and companies like Logitech are leading the charge with highly sophisticated products that ooze elegance. And if you ask me, that's exactly what Apple is best at.
I don't think we can debate the fact that Apple wants to control the living room, but I'm not sure it really wants to control every facet of it. Does it really want to release a picture frame? Is an alarm clock really necessary for it to become an even greater presence in the industry?
I don't think so.
Apple's vision for the future is rooted in its belief that if it can strategically guard against any outside intrusion by competitors and create a compelling set of products that won't impede its ability to maintain its status as one of the elite members in the industry. If it loses those two attributes, it's left with nothing more than a bloated product line with too many choices and not enough benefits.
Apple simply can't do everything right. And although some may want to believe that it can, rest assured that it's good at creating products that people actually want; not devices that we don't care about.
For more on what Don is up to, follow him on Twitter!
Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has written about everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Don is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and posts at The Digital Home. He is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.







Forrester thinks it'll connect to iPhoto or other online image services and could be a staple in your living room. I think Forrester is totally off its rocker."
While you're correct that analyst predictions like this are almost never correct, you might want to defend your reasoning with, oh, I don't know.... ANYTHING. This is the epitome of declining journalistic standards at Cnet....
Just-another-mac-hater who is trying in vain to find something he can criticize Apple about... and yes I saw through your disingenuous offerings of praise.
Mike
I left the PC world because if Vista is the future of PC's, I want no part of it. By the same token, if I have to shave an apple symbol in the back of my head just because I own a MacBook and iPod, I'll bail in a heartbeat (and I'm exaggerating, of course.) Sometimes it feels that in order to be an owner of an Apple product, you're expected to give up all thought and reason in order to expend energy praising Steve Jobs and the Mighty Apple Empire. Sorry, not my scene. The Mac is a TOOL. It's an elegant tool, but it's still a tool.
The remote idea is an interesting one. I see something like the harmony one, but with no physical buttons at all. The iPod Touch interface would be perfect for a universal remote. I think digital photo frames are pretty silly actually, so I really have no opinion on that except to say, Apple or no, I'd never buy it. The alarm clock is the dumbest thing I've ever heard in my entire life. I own an iPod speaker dock and I purposely stayed away from the alarm clock docks because the speakers generally suck on those devices, in my experience. But an Apple Alarm clock? What's next, Apple pill boxes that remind you to take your pills? Apple bookshelves that recommend a new book for you to read based on what you pull off the shelves? An Apple pantry that automatically updates your shopping list (stored on your mac, of course)? See, I can predict silly Apple products too Forrester. Anyone can. Doesn't take research money to make claims about Apple's future product line. The fact is, in five years, we'll all be totally off the mark. Who predicted the iPod? The iPhone? No one. We can't predict the next innovation. We can speculate, but we'll never be on target.
Personally, I'm waiting for my iShoe. It can power my iPod while I walk. Yeah, that's the ticket.
It's amazing how tortuous your logic has to be in order to spin this tale of assumptions and givens and "everybody knows".
Go back to your hole, troll.
I definitely have to agree with the logic of the stupidity of the photo frame and alarm clock. There's just no way. But i have a feeling the equivalent of the remote control will probably be appearing in the next few weeks when the App store appears. Somebody will write a universal remote control app for the iTouch and the iPhone. An interface such as those two devices have is just begging to be used that way.
- your photos
- your Calendar
- your videos
- web browse
And would also recognize your handwriting and translate it into text and save your drawings.
Now THAT would be something. All the functionality and architecture of an iPhone, synced up with all your other Apple products, but just on your wall or your desk as a larger, touch sensitive display.
A less inflammatory title would have been along the lines of, "Sorry, Forrester, but even Apple can't make dumb ideas work."
-
by AdamMoore
May 23, 2008 12:37 PM PDT
- I enjoy how everyone rips into him, further proving the point.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 65 Comments >>Last I checked, opinion wasn't something to get verbally raped about, however, in the Apple world, if it doesn't start with "Mac" or "i" essentially you are from the degraded gene pool.
As for the people who say, "Why does C|NET allow them to post this ... " well, first...this is a blog, and second, I sometimes wonder why your own common sense allows you to post the same dribble about PCs.