March 27, 2008 10:27 AM PDT

Why video game cutscenes should be eliminated

I don't know about you, but after playing through countless hours of video games saving the world in more worlds than I can count, I've grown tired of the same old thing. I can live with sword fights and looting, but more than anything else, I'm sick and tired of cutscenes that break up the action.

Can anyone give me one good reason for why cutscenes are really that necessary? Sure, they help move the story along and I can appreciate that, but I don't need fancy renderings of my pixelated heroes talking to each other when all I really want to do is slay some more beasts.

Bioshock

Bioshock does it right.

(Credit: CNET Networks)

As far as I can tell, this idea of cutscenes, which was made brutally unbearable by Hideo Kojima in the Metal Gear series is nothing more than an attempt by game developers to display their graphical prowess and make a video game feel more like a movie.

I don't want a movie. I want a video game.

More than likely, some of those who enjoy cutscenes in games will say that I don't appreciate the art that goes into gaming, but it's actually quite the opposite. In fact, I consider video games a unique art where the viewer can actually participate in creating it. But because I feel that way, I think I should be interacting with the title in order for it to be considered a full-fledged piece of art.

And although I feel this way, it's quite apparent that I'm in the minority. As I see it, more and more games are utilizing cutscenes that tear you away from the action in order to push the story forward.

I think it's a mistake.

Part of my love for video games resides in my desire to be immersed in the world I'm interacting with. Unlike a movie where I'm nothing more than a spectator looking at a screen, video games provide me with the opportunity to be the hero (or villain) and become the star of an on-screen performance. In essence, I value immersion more than anything else.

But when a cutscene drags me away from that world and forces me to watch, well, me, interacting with others, fighting in ways that I'm incapable of or doing things that my own controls won't allow, I'm taken out of that experience and made a spectator. And while it's nice to see that the characters look great, I couldn't care less -- I want to be put back into that environment.

Now, I know what you're thinking: "But there are a bunch of games that play cutscenes in-game." Surely some of you would say Halo does that to some extent and others would argue that Call of Duty 4 has some of that as well. And while that's true, there's really only one title -- Bioshock -- that has done it enough for me to justify saying that that title has what I'm looking for.

If you haven't played Bioshock, you owe it to yourself to do so. But if you have, you probably realize that throughout much of the game, you're able to walk around, look around and do almost anything you want during cutscenes. And although the story is being moved forward during this time, it's allowing you to stay in character and play as if you're being spoken to or directed.

But alas, Bioshock is by no means the norm and unfortunately, most games still force you to play for a while and then stop before action resumes.

No one is sure what the future of video games will look like, but rest assured that until cutscenes that take me out of the action are eliminated, I will not be happy.

And neither should you.

advertisement
 
Discover unlimited music for the price of one CD a month
Recent posts from The Digital Home
Why Apple should release a game console
Why the Xbox 360 will win the console war
The Digital Home 14: Is Blu-ray really dead?
Does GTA IV live up to the hype?
How Yahoo can turn itself around
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 19 comments (Page 1 of 2)
by wolfwhite99 March 27, 2008 11:03 AM PDT
Halflife 2 did that great also
Reply to this comment
by istarman March 27, 2008 11:03 AM PDT
While the rant against cutscenes in videogames goes back a long way, it's by no means as evil as people say they are. It's the offenders like Xenosaga (which was one giant cutscene in itself) that really messes it up for the rest of the genre. For example: Final Fantasy X had some of the most beautiful cutscenes ever made. Does it distract from the story? No, because it allows you to take a break from the controller and just watch a short clip. The clips themselves aren't parts of the story you need to interact with. What actually bothers me is when you're in a game and you have to press X countless numbers of times to move the dialog forward. "How are you, Snake?" Click "Fine, sir" Click (and this goes on for 3-4 minutes. Click click click) So, I do see your point, but IMO, cutscenes have their place if they're used properly.
Reply to this comment
by eurotransient March 27, 2008 11:46 AM PDT
Amen to the mention above about Half Life. I still remember playing the original game for the first time and realizing that even though I was controlling Gordon Freeman, I was still being treated to a cut scene. The excitement I felt at that level of immersion was palpable and really opened my eyes to what video games could and should go on to do. Of course, it's been nearly ten years since I had that first experience, and it's really upsetting to think about how little I've been able to experience I game in that way since. Bioshock is a really outstanding example, as is Half Life 2. I'm sure there are some others, but the list is short enough for it to be considered a real issue.
Reply to this comment
by purpleLightning March 27, 2008 12:57 PM PDT
Why does it always have to be all or nothing in these types of arguments? Everything in moderation. Don't overdo it with cutscenes and they work perfectly well as a way to forward story or character development (not just as an excuse to show off purdy graphics, Mr. Reisinger) and assist immersion in the process, believe it or not. And the problem with fully incorporating the info from non-interactive cutscenes into interactive gameplay is that it makes it possible to miss information important for advancing the game, if you happen to be doing something else that distracts you. Audio cues in a world of 5.1 surround sound game environments are particularly prone to be missed.
Reply to this comment
by compudoc318 March 27, 2008 1:36 PM PDT
All I ask with cutscenes is that if I don't want to see it, let me hit a button, and skip it. I agree about final fantasy 10 having beautiful images, but after youve beaten it a few times, the cutscenes are useless and you can't skip em. Thats all I ask, if they are there, give me the choice if I want to view them. One gripe I do have though, is every commercial I see on t.v., shows only cutscene footage, never show actual gameplay.
Reply to this comment
by Snowy016 March 27, 2008 6:21 PM PDT
Completely disagree. I don't want to run through a shooter nonstop without end -- that's what consoles are for. Cutscenes, to me, are a reward for my work and a chance to catch my breath and feel that I've accomplished something. That said, compudoc has a good point -- there should be a way to skip it if you don't want to see it and, off hand, I can't think of a single game that doesn't have that option.
Reply to this comment
by defuniak March 27, 2008 9:54 PM PDT
Since "No one is sure what the future of video games will look like", I'd much rather people come up with ideas of what it will be, and not what it will NOT be. Cutscenes is but one tool used by game developers in delivering an entertaining experience. Just like dialogue, gameplay, level design, music score, they all help to either immerse you, or to invoke/provoke a response that the developers deem appropriate. Sure there are times when these tools are abused or used clumsily to the opposite effect, but that should not invalidate them as a component of game design. I don't really see why one would prefer to have the ability to walk away (not out of the room mind you) and swing a crowbar at a wall while a character is speaking to you, over a cinematic cutscene? It really isn't like you were robbed the opportunity to change the narrative or anything? As for players helping to create the experience, well, books literally dictate every word of the story to its audience, and yet people with imagination still tailor-design their individual version of the story in their minds. Just because cutscenes are employed, it doesn't make a game's narrative any less personal. But yea, as you said, no one is sure what the future of video games will look like, but according to you, it seems that it should be about making you, the admitted minority, happy!
Reply to this comment
by compucrazy12 March 28, 2008 6:57 AM PDT
I personally don't mind short cut scenes but i am constantly tortured trying to skip through the excruciatingly long cut scenes (which ironically are usually the ones the games wont let you skip). When i play games, honestly, all i have time to do is actually play the freakin game. I would go get dinner during stupid metal gear cut scenes.
Reply to this comment
by itstheoldindy March 28, 2008 7:17 AM PDT
Meh... it's something that can be done well or poorly. I got sick of the later Final Fantasy games because it felt like there was more movie than game. It was like those old record books where you read along, wait for the cue, and turn the page. On the other hand, I adore the cutscenes from Diablo II: Lord of Destruction, and some of them I will watch every time I play through. That's a game that definitely needed the breaks at those points, and it filled in backstory in a way that NPC blather couldn't do.
Reply to this comment
by Drizzt3 March 28, 2008 8:51 AM PDT
I couldn't agree more with his perspective on cutscenes. BioShock did a great job, because they were short on ones you were forced to watch or they were ones where you could continue to play while the cutscene was going on which was very cool (very natural) I play the video game to escape reality for a brief while... and find myself getting frustrated during cutscenes like in Lost Odyssey (they were forever... and numerous). I stopped playing it because I couldn't stand all the scenes and dreams. After a brief fight in the beginning, the next hour of gameplay was spent watching cutscenes / dreams and walking around the city talking with people (although the story is very linear so talking was pretty useless). Call of Duty 4 did a good job with the cutscenes as well... because they are short and could change your perspective during them (i.e. move your head). My opinion: Keep the cutscenes to a minimum or execute them like Bioshock, else you lose people. In fact, during most cutscenes that is a good excuse for me to grab a drink, a bite to eat, or use the restroom. But why? Just make the game and let me pause it if I want to watch a movie I will turn it on HBO.
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About The Digital Home

  • Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has covered everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Besides his work with CNET, Don's work has been featured in a variety of other publications including PC World and a host of Ziff-Davis publications.

    Don writes product reviews for InformationWeek and is a regular contributor to Processor Magazine. You can visit his personal site at DonReisinger.com or if you would like to email Don with questions or comments, drop him a line at CNETDigitalHome@gmail.com. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Subscribe to the Digital Home podcast

Have you ever wanted a no-nonsense discussion on what is really going with all the tech topics related to your Digital Home? If so, join Don Reisinger as he brings you the same biting commentary you've come to expect from his Digital Home blog in all its audio glory.


View all Digital Home podcast episode blog entries


Don on Twitter

Follow Don at Twitter

Don's del.icio.us bookmarks:

More...



advertisement
Click Here.
On TechRepublic: 10 ways users mess up their computers
Visit other CNET Networks sites: