The SNES is the greatest console of all time
Over the past few months, I decided to go back in time and relive the days of old. Instead of wasting my day doing things that just weren't productive, I decided to get all of my old consoles out (NES, Genesis, SNES, 3DO, 32X, Sega CD, Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, Playstation 1 and 2 and the Nintendo 64) to finally make the decision on which console is truly the best of all-time (so far).
And while the decision was a difficult one -- it's tough to beat Duck Hunt and Super Mario Bros. -- it seemed almost too simple to declare the SNES the greatest console of all-time.
When it comes to gaming, most people will claim (and rightfully so) that Nintendo has been a trailblazer in the industry. Without the company having the courage to bring video games back to the states in the '80s, the chances of us enjoying this multi-billion dollar industry would be slim.
Why not the NES?
And although the NES was a groundbreaking platform that reignited the world's passion for video games, sold over 60 million units and had an outstanding library of games that was led by Super Mario Bros. and Contra (Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, Start) to just name a few, it couldn't quite stack up to the SNES' ability to bring third-part development, games and overall quality to the industry.
Why not the Genesis?
The Genesis is one of those platforms that most people look back on fondly, but for some reason, it always takes a backseat to the SNES. Let's face it -- the Genesis was a great console that, with the help of Sonic, created the industry's best console war to date. Who can forget the old slogan "Genesis does what Nintendon't" or its backward compatibility with Sega's Master System?
But in the end, the Genesis was rife with peripheral inconsistencies (do I really need the 32X add-on?) and couldn't stack up to the SNES in sheer library size and enjoyment. And although I enjoyed my games on the Genesis and sports games never looked so good to that point, it couldn't quite meet the challenge presented by Nintendo.
Why not the Playstation?
To be quite honest, the only reason I'm even mentioning the Playstation in this discussion is because I know that at least a handful of Sony fanboys will cry foul if I didn't. But the sad truth is, Sony's Playstation is not the greatest console of all time and if I were to rank it, I don't even think it would make the top three.
Let's face it -- when you think about the greatest consoles of all time, you generally remember the times you were forced to leave your SNES running for fear of losing your progress because you could only save at the end of levels or the moments when innovation was truly king in the industry. Call me old-fashioned, but the Playstation simply wasn't the groundbreaking device that the SNES was. Suffice it to say, the Playstation was great in its own right, but it was a product of its time -- a moment in video game history where innovation was losing ground to copycats and graphics meant more than anything else.
So what's so great about the SNES?
Perhaps even more than the games or the hardware, the Super Nintendo Entertainment System did everything you would expect from a follow-up to a wildly popular video game console. In essence, the NES was the building block of American gaming in the '80s and the SNES was first console to be drastically different (and better) than its predecessor.
Beyond that, the SNES was popular well into the 32-bit era of gaming and stood its ground against the Playstation even though the latter was released almost five years later. And although it didn't quite sell nearly as many units as the NES, games like Super Mario World, Super Mario Kart, Donkey Kong Country, Street Fighter II, The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past, and even Mortal Kombat made it a must-buy for gamers all over the world.
But perhaps most importantly, think of the world the SNES spawned. Instead of releasing a veiled copy of the NES to get in on the fight with Sega earlier, Nintendo created a follow-up that was worthy of the 'Super' moniker and gave developers the license they needed to create the legendary titles that we still play today.
And after playing through some of the classics from well over ten years ago, today's gaming just doesn't compare. In fact, I would gladly give up the beauty of Gears of War for just 15 minutes of Donkey Kong Country. Who else is with me?
Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has written about everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Don is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and posts at The Digital Home. He is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
- Topics:
-
HDTV,
-
Digital Home,
-
Living Room,
-
Family Room
- Tags:
-
Video games,
-
Consoles,
-
Nintendo,
-
Sega,
-
Sony
- Bookmark:
- Digg
- Del.icio.us







Even beyond the classics mentioned in the article, there's Megaman, Star Fox, Lufia, Final Fantasy, Dragon Quest, Tales of Phantasia, and of course Chrono Trigger. Many of the games in that time, and many today even, focused so much on graphics that gameplay and storytelling fell by the wayside.
the entire article is full of subjective terms like "i", "remember", "i think", "you generally remember". all these terms are used over and over again, a strong sign or a weak article.
you don't go into any facts. you claim the SNES had an great library but never touched on the fact that the PS2 had the LARGEST library in game history.
you clam the SNES to be revolutionary, but left out the fact that the PSX was the FIRST 3D CONSOLE TO MAKE IT.
you claim the SNES deserve best console ever because it succeeded the NES. but never went into the fact that the PS2 succeeded the PSX (which sold more units than the NES) and is the birth child of what is the closest thing to a universal game console.
you haven't brought up any resources, any objective information. your entire article is just about YOUR OPINION based on YOUR memories as a child, nostalgia is one of the worst biases.
i know i sound like a sony fan boy but im not. i don't own a PSX, i got the PS2 when the 360 was launch, i play more 360 and DS than any thing else. i just know my games. i know the history and the culture around games. i can think about game culture on an objective level. you you sir.... obviously can not.
He's a subjective writer... thats not a secret.
"you don't go into any facts. you claim the SNES had an great library"
Um... are you suggesting that SNES didn't have a great library? 'cause in that case you'd be wrong.
"i know i sound like a sony fan boy but im not."
If it walks like a duck...
"i just know my games."
Oh well then you should be on a game show or something... Oh wait... you're not.
"i know the history and the culture around games."
I believe you... not.
"i can think about game culture on an objective level. you you sir.... obviously can not."
"you, you sir"? Who says "sir" these days anyway. How old are you son?
You say PSX was the first 3d console to make it. First there where 3d abilities in SNES games (sometimes looking better than a psx game...) well before Sony even thought about getting into consoles. Speaking of facts... there would be NO Playstation consoles here if it wasn't for the SNES and Nintendo's bad choices. PSX STARTED AS A SNES ADDON.
So far as library of games... you do not say where your fact of largest library of games come from.... but if you look at quality of titles (something touched upon in this article) then SNES wins again....
Sir your history of the culture of games is flawed. Before you start to bash others on these interwebs, close your eyes, think for a sec.... and for gods sake re-read what you type so you don't sound like an idiot.
"you don't go into any facts. you claim the SNES had an great library but never touched on the fact that the PS2 had the LARGEST library in game history."
He doesn't have to go into facts. There are NO facts when it comes to what games are better than others, only opinions. If you think a larger library equals a better system, you are entitled to that opinion, but it will be my opinion that you have down syndrome. Also, there are more Gameboy games than Playstation games.
"you clam the SNES to be revolutionary, but left out the fact that the PSX was the FIRST 3D CONSOLE TO MAKE IT."
Let's assume that the PSX was the first successful 3D platform (it wasn't). How does that take away from the SNES being revolutionary? All facts aside, please explain your logic. Actually the Sega Saturn was a fully 3D platform and was released before the PSX in Japan and was successful. So even if you don't count the minor 3D capabilities that even the SNES had (look at Mario RPG or Star Fox or Donkey Kong Counrty 1, 2, or 3) there was still that system that beat out the PSX.
"you claim the SNES deserve best console ever because it succeeded the NES. but never went into the fact that the PS2 succeeded the PSX (which sold more units than the NES) and is the birth child of what is the closest thing to a universal game console."
I'm not going to comment about the PS2 part of this comment because your first statement here is wrong. He never claimed that the SNES was superior to the NES because it surpassed it. Even if he did, what does your coment have to do with anything?
Now I find kornsterking's comment funny. Not because of his rant, but because I said that you were obviously Sony biased (at http://blogs.cnet.com/8601-13506_1-9853559.html?communityId=2017&messageId=300356&pageNum=2#300356 - in another article). No matter what you say, you will always find detractors ;-)
SNES isn't the best console of all time. Just NO.
PS2 has that honor. I am not a Sony fanboy, far from it, I love all consoles.
But PS2 has the biggest and best library of all time with games that rival blockbuster movies in depth, storyline and experience.
You got games such as Metal Gear Solid 2 and 3 which are interactive blockbuster movies. Great storyline, allot of heat and gameplay to match it.
RPG's there is Kingom Hearts, Xenosaga, FFX, Dark Cloud 2
Action titles you got Devil May Cry, RE4, God of War
Quirky titles such as Guitaroo Man, Mr.Mosqito,We Love Katamari
FPS well we got Timesplitters, Black,
Scary titles such as Silent Hill
Platformers got Rachet and Clank, Sly Cooper and Jak which all give Mario a run for his money
The PS2 has the most diverse library of all time and includes most of the great classics of old that can be put on the system other than stuff like Metroid,Zelda, Mario all due to being Nintendo property.
But for the PS1 not bringing anything to gaming. PS1 made console gaming mainstream, accepted. It was the first console to really succeed with using disc format (notable exception would be PC Engine CD-Rom). PS1 brought us huge worlds to explore, voice acting unseen before, brought us Hollywood Style epics that are still loved such as FFVII, MGS. PS1 brought gaming into true 3-D, not just blocky graphics along with other such merits. To say PS1 played no significance in gaming is bias, and unprofessional.
I love all system though, some more than others, though I can't actually pick a favorite.
I would claim the DC to be the best console anyway, but that's because I'm a fanboy.
And because it's the best! =D
But hey, I have a Wii/DC/PS2 thing going on at my house, and soon to add an original Xbox I'm getting for free. Don't forget my DS and (bricked) PSP. I couldn't live without my PS2, for sure (one thing it DOES have lots of is music games and RPGs!). But I'd rather just have every system and get it over with :)
Its all about the breathtaking games of the time and the PS1 had so many more all time great games than any other console.
You claim there was no individual, creative games on this console. I disagree, in fact the diversity and development of genres exploded on this console and that everyone has been copying these since or at least working on the themes developed here, some that became mainstream, developed their titles into 3d world....just look at the Franchise's still in play....they are still active/well known titles some 10 years later -
Lets look at this...
Resident Evil - Horror Survival (3rd person shooter)
Tomb Raider - Adventure/Puzzle (3rd person shooter)
Gran Turismo - Racing Sim, Exotic cars, Tune car, parts, grow garage
Tekken - 3d fighting master
Soul Calibur - 3d fighting with weapons
Final Fantasy VII - *** RPG - turn based, large spell, CGI driven, stylistic
Twisted Metal - Apocolyptic battle car genre
Driver - Pre-cursor to GTA going 3d (had record playback functionality within game footage)
Tony Hawk - most extreme sports games coolboards, dave mirra bmx etc all play like this game
Time Crisis - Light gun
Metal Gear Solid - stealth 3rd person shooter
Syphon Filter - elite agent 3rd person shooter
Tenchu - samarai 3rd person/stealth
Colony Wars - attempted at removing linear gameplay with multiple choice storyline development/space adventure/galactic battles
Music 2000 - make your own beats on a console - a sign of the times
Shane Warnes Cricket 2000 - best cricket game made
Pro Evolution soccer - took the title of best soccer game on this console
Vandal Hearts - turn based strategic RPG
This was the 3d generation - where the games took their franchises and turned them into 3 dimensional gaming and graphics, better camera angles, providing that sense of putting the gamer in the players shoes and opening up the in game environments. That cant be disputed.
The system also introduced Storage Devices so you could load your save on other consoles.
Playstation made CD/Disks the new format of choice over other cartridge based systems - meaning chipping consoles also became popular at this time - this was the system that took all that to a new level.
startfox and the other handful of FX chip games brought 3d into console. (unless you count wolfenstein 3d which also was on SNES)
the only thing playstation brought to the table was the mainstreaming of CD consoles. it took what sega and other systems did..and improved on it..
but even 3d platforming wasnt good until n64 came alone with mario 64.
SNES is the most ground breaking system nuff said.
Plus, don't forget the peripherals! Super Scope anyone? 5-player Bomberman? Gameboy games? :P
SNES is my all time favorite,then the N64.
-
by nashy008
January 27, 2008 1:55 AM PST
- I agree with the article being biased, these people must be in there high 20s early 30s and remember it from their childhood...
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 49 Comments >>I think it is the PS2.. It had graphics, decent game collection that continues on even though there is next gen consoles around... The way the console went from opening game to next gen titles was impressive. What impressed me is the fact it has unique games like singstar (cant stand it) guitar hero... They are amazing party games..
Btw.. I owned the Xbox... And sega master system and snes...