January 15, 2008 7:13 AM PST

An interview with the misguided RIAA

Now that you had the chance to read my column detailing the misguided beliefs of the RIAA, I wanted to give you the opportunity to see the full transcript of the interview I conducted with the organization.

You'll notice that none of the quotes from the previous column were taken out of context because, well, first and foremost, I didn't need to--this organization speaks for itself. You'll also notice that the RIAA really is all of those things most people believe they are. Of course, don't necessarily tell them that, because they won't believe it.

Regardless, this interview depicts the RIAA exactly how they want to be perceived--a group that relies on (and enjoys) lawsuits. It's an organization that has little idea of what we truly want as consumers and, for some reason, has a severe distaste for college students.

In response to my column, one RIAA representative told me that it's easy "to sit on the sidelines and take potshots. It's less easy when you actually have a dog in the fight."

Is it really? Personally, I think it's a sad day when an organization needs to call upon its high-powered lawyers just because it has "a dog in the fight." Along with that, what is that dog in the fight? The artists or the record labels? My guess is the latter.

But without further ado, here is the unabridged transcript of my interview with the RIAA.

Don: Please tell me who you are and what you do.

RIAA: Cara Duckworth, spokeswoman for the RIAA.

Don: What can you tell me about the college deterrence program?

RIAA: Began last February. It was becoming clearer that despite cool new legal services and the ongoing educational efforts, too many students--some of music's biggest fans--were getting their music illegally and learning the wrong lessons about stealing and the law. There had to be a deterrence factor involved so that individuals knew that along with personal consequences (i.e., viruses, spyware infiltrating hard drive) there would also be legal consequences to engaging in illegal downloading behavior. Bringing lawsuits was by no means our first choice, but a necessary step we had to take.

Don: Why college students?

RIAA: First, it should be clarified that our college campaign is in addition to the lawsuits we file against individuals using commercial ISPs to illegally download and distribute music. Second, college students have reached a stage in life when their music habits are crystallized, and their appreciation for intellectual property has not yet reached its full development. These two points coupled together present challenges to those who would like to be compensated for their creative works. Understanding the value of intellectual property is important to the future job market for many of these students--industries that rely on copyright protection employ more than 11 million workers nationwide and continue to grow.

Don: What group of people do you see pirating the most music?

RIAA: While college students used to be some of music's greatest fans, unfortunately that is no longer the case. I would point you to the evidence of the extensiveness of music theft amongst college campuses from Student Monitor and other market research firms to show why we are focusing some of our efforts on universities.

Don: How do you respond to people who say your organization is a group of bullies?

RIAA: I have to step back for a moment. These are certainly heavy issues and none which we take lightly. When an individual is caught illegally downloading music, it sometimes happens that the person creates a stir. The reality of it is that nobody wants to get caught and most people complain when they are. The music industry has lost more than $3 billion in sales over the last few years. Bringing lawsuits is certainly no one's ideal answer--we're well aware of that. But if we had sat on our hands and chosen to do nothing about the piracy problem as the music industry was hemorrhaging jobs and lost sales, imagine what the extent of theft would be today and how the legal marketplace would be struggling to gain traction. The digital music marketplace is demonstrably better because of our efforts.

Don: How have you addressed those huge pirating cartels overseas? Are you going for a soft target?

RIAA: Our preference--first and foremost--is to take action against the services themselves that facilitate the illegal downloading and distribution of copyrighted works. We are actively assisting efforts by policy makers in Washington to encourage countries whose copyright laws have not kept up with the times or who do not appropriately enforce intellectual property violations. Additionally, we are affiliated with IFPI, which represents the interest of the global music community and assists in the enforcement of copyright infringement cases outside of the U.S.

Don: Do you think your policy of lawsuits and settlements work?

RIAA: Absolutely. Since we began this initiative, we've seen a P2P problem that once was growing at dizzying speeds essentially flatten out. People are now more aware of what is legal and illegal when it comes to downloading music. But more importantly, bringing lawsuits is only one piece of the pie--we are actively investing resources in the education of students of all ages on the value of music and importance of copyrights and, perhaps most importantly, music companies are continuously partnering with exciting new services that offer fans an array of innovative opportunities to access their favorite music.

Don: Why do you think you're such a disliked organization?

RIAA: I don't agree with the loaded premise of the question. In some online quarters, there may be lots of heat about the tough stands we sometimes must take. But amongst the general public, the favorability ratings of the record industry remain as positive as ever and surpass other forms of entertainment like movie or TV studios. I believe my answer to question No. 5 can apply here as well. But let it be said--the RIAA is much more than lawsuits. For example, we also are responsible for the Gold & Platinum program awarding artists who have achieved successful album sales and are active proponents of free speech in music. But no one likes lawsuits, and no one likes to get caught. It's not an ideal situation for any party involved. But with all the new, innovative legal alternatives in the marketplace (and more emerging on almost a daily basis), the music community is proactively offering fans ways to avoid lawsuits and get their favorite music at affordable prices.

Don: How do you respond to the people who say you're going after grandmothers and young children when you should be going after real criminals in gunships?

RIAA: I'd give them the facts and encourage them not to believe everything they read that aggressively villainizes the organization. We have a physical antipiracy unit that assists law enforcement agents in shutting down piracy operations both big and small. Oftentimes street peddlers selling bootlegged copies of music are also involved in large-scale drug and weapons trafficking, and we find clear evidence of that on raids. As for individuals themselves, we have no way of screening defendants based on demographics, socioeconomic status, or perceived sympathy. Upon initial discovery of a violation, we have an IP address, a sampling of the files that were shared, and a timestamp of the activity. We consistently follow the prescribed legal process to obtain identifying information and always try to be fair and reasonable in resolving each of our cases.

Don: Is there anything else you'd like to add?

RIAA: Regarding our college initiative, a university's role in reducing the level of piracy on its campus cannot be overemphasized. We have consistently said that the more proactive a school is in the education of its students regarding its IT and enforcement policies, the offering of great legal alternatives so that students can have access to their favorite music (at deeply discounted prices or even for free), and most importantly, implementing effective technology that helps protect the integrity of its network, will lead to fewer instances of violations and fewer instances of hearing from us--a win for everybody!

So there you have it. The full interview with the RIAA.

Have a field day.

advertisement
 
Discover unlimited music for the price of one CD a month
Recent posts from The Digital Home
Why Sega should release a new console
The Digital Home 15: The Violent Video Game Edition
2010 will be an important year for Microsoft
What does the file sharing strikeout mean to us?
Why the iPhone will be open to all GSM carriers this year
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 50 comments (Page 1 of 4)
by andrewrm January 15, 2008 8:52 AM PST
They are so far behind the curve. Artists established and new are now marketing without the leaches at the major lables. They are going to be left behind as they refuse to accept the real world. Fools.
Reply to this comment View reply
by skyzophrenyk January 15, 2008 9:23 AM PST
The RIAA disgusts me. How is it the responsiblity of college campuses? They are suddenly babysitters for grown adults? So everyone should be punished by loss of financial aid becasue somebody decided to download some music? Please, its not even theft, its COPYRIGHT INFRINGMENT. They are not synonyms.
Reply to this comment View reply
by James7777777 January 15, 2008 9:47 AM PST
It's wonderful how they can spin numbers. The RIAA starts acting like the Mafia suing everyone in sight so consumers begin to boycott. Rather then recognize the boycott and improve their business practices they claim the lose of sales is due to piracy. WAKE UP! You are a hated group. You are losing money because educated consumers are boycotting all music that supports the RIAA.
Reply to this comment
by gminetos January 15, 2008 9:58 AM PST
Don, what I wanted to hear/see you offer in these columns re the RIAA was what solution WE as the public want. What's OUR answer to the problem ? How would WE want the recording industry to change ? We need to stop bitching about them and offer solutions to get them to change ! And as a journalist on Cnet you should be leading that. My offer you might ask ? I favor the "all-you-can-eat buffet for one low price" model. This is where for each technology item that you buy that can record and/or play ANY media file then $1 or 1% (or some such portion) of that goes to pay the music/movie industry for your right (or license) to FREELY copy/trade media files without limit or restriction. Such a model does not impact anyone except those enjoying the use of music/movies/videos/etc and it only impacts them in a small way at only discreet times when they purchase certain tech equipment. This should be pitched to the RIAA and MPAA as a solution. If you don't like this model, don't just throw stones at it but come up with a better one. It's high time to offer and debate real solutions instead of crying about the Big Blue Meanies.
Reply to this comment View reply
by MikesVoiceOfReason January 15, 2008 11:24 AM PST
OK, maybe I'm probably missing the point again, BUT.... Who cares if the RIAA goes after Grannies, kids, colleges, etc.? Yes it?s the low hanging fruit, and yes this makes them lazy and hated, and yes they probably are out of touch with the ?real? world, but there is an incredibly easy way to stop all of this. It's a 2 prong approach: 1) Stop stealing. Yes, it really is that simple. We have to put into place all kinds of laws to punish the rest of us (charging more to cover the costs of those who break the laws). Everyone has a basic understanding of right and wrong - ask any 5 year old - we just sometimes choose to ignore the little voice and hope we can get something for nothing. 2) Vote with your wallet. I live in a great country that runs quite well on the free enterprise system. There are a lot of things I WANT for free - free health care, free housing, free transportation, free food, free music, free internet, free text messaging, etc. Guess what, I don't have the RIGHT to these items for free. I can, however, pay for them and am empowered to negotiate for the best price. It always amazes me how people are willing to pay ridiculous prices for sports tickets, concert tickets, etc., but complain when they have to pony up for music, cell phone service, etc. The RIAA may be the most evil org on the planet, but they won't exist long if people get together and collectively boycott their services. I am writing this on Martin Luther King Jr's birthday; a man who accomplished quite a bit of change using the same boycott practice. If you don't like the current price of music - stop buying it! Trust me - prices WILL change. Don, I heard you on TWiT and I'm not sure I see it the same way you do. You are probably closer than I am, but what did you expect them to say? Again, if we don't like them, let's band together, set a price point we are willing to pay for music and stop stealing it. BAM - they are out of business. I work in a group where intellectual property is extremely important to our business' survival. I guarantee if someone infringes on our rights, we will be all over them as well.
Reply to this comment View reply
by aka_tripleB January 15, 2008 11:43 AM PST
I like how they say, "Bringing lawsuits was by no means our first choice, but a necessary step we had to take." Yet have they ever tried any other means? Have they ever pressed criminal charges against anyone? Isn't it considered extortion when they allegedly catch people illegally downloading songs, and take people's money for it without a trial or litigation? Is it possible that the RIAA doesn't follow standard protocol for theft because then people will find out how much their product is worth, have investigation into the worth of their product, or police give their cases low priority because of the worth of their products and frequency of the occurrences? Or have the judicial system question how well they actually secure their products from thieves?
Reply to this comment View reply
by MedicineHead January 15, 2008 11:45 AM PST
I heard you on TWiT as well, and was intrigued to read of the "insulting" nature of the RIAA representative. I don't see it. Many of your questions were very biased and worded poorly, and despite the somewhat hostile nature of the questions, I think the RIAA representative handled things pretty well.
Reply to this comment
by jpmays January 15, 2008 11:56 AM PST
I noticed there was no mention about the skyrocketing prices of CDs over the last five to 10 years! I also saw no mention of the fact that the reason people are downloading music from P2P networks is because of the exorbitant/prohibitive cost of a single CD, which may only contain four or five songs one likes? Maybe the RIAA should address this issue first before pointing fingers!
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
by kwhittingham January 15, 2008 12:50 PM PST
Sad. I don't think that big record companies (i.e. the bulk of the recording industry) are good for music. Quite the opposite. Currently music is no longer successful on its own merit - Darwinism is out. Mostly someone is pre-selecting what we buy. I think (and hope) that over the next few years, the record company as we know it will dissapear. The bulk of the service they provide to us has been replace free of charge by the internet. Good bye and good riddance.
Reply to this comment
by mcooper13 January 15, 2008 1:07 PM PST
Like someone alluded to yesterday, going after college students is a poor strategy. These students will eventually be running the country. In a decade or two these students will be leaders of government and industry. I wouldn't be surprised to see them overturn the DMCA and destroy the RIAA and MPAA - no matter how many lobbyists are thrown at them. Nice short term thinking.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About The Digital Home

  • Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has covered everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Besides his work with CNET, Don's work has been featured in a variety of other publications including PC World and a host of Ziff-Davis publications.

    Don writes product reviews for InformationWeek and is a regular contributor to Processor Magazine. You can visit his personal site at DonReisinger.com or if you would like to email Don with questions or comments, drop him a line at CNETDigitalHome@gmail.com. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Subscribe to the Digital Home podcast

Have you ever wanted a no-nonsense discussion on what is really going with all the tech topics related to your Digital Home? If so, join Don Reisinger as he brings you the same biting commentary you've come to expect from his Digital Home blog in all its audio glory.


View all Digital Home podcast episode blog entries


Don on Twitter

Follow Don at Twitter

Don's del.icio.us bookmarks:

More...



advertisement
On MovieTome: POINT BREAK 2, yes, you read that right!
Visit other CNET Networks sites: