Digg was the best social destination of 2007
During this past year, a number of oddities emerged in the world of tech. First, Microsoft was forced to live through an unbridled flop, Apple was enjoying its meteoric rise as the most successful company of the year and social networks gained even more steam. On the back of that, the world's favorite social network, MySpace, quickly gave ground to Facebook and companies like the ill-fated Netscape tried to take on Digg.
And it's that site -- Digg.com -- that emerged this year, not necessarily as the most popular social site (it's tough to call it a full-fledged social networking company in the vein of a Facebook or MySpace), but as the best destination for people surfing the Web.
Don't believe me? Let's take a look at some other social networking sites to see why they couldn't make the cut.
Facebook Sure, Facebook enjoyed immense success this year and as of the end of November, Compete is showing that the site was ranked 19th on the Web, compared to Digg's 36th spot and MySpace's 6th.
And while it may be one of the most popular sites, it's easily one of the most annoying. Let's be honest, how many people out there actually care that you're "tired" or "in a bad mood" each time your status is updated? Even better, do I need to be poked every time you're too darn shy (or stupid) to just send me a message or, here's an idea, call me?
Of course, Facebook's annoyances go far beyond friendships. What about privacy concerns when some lonely guy sitting in his mother's basement starts trolling around the site looking for Halloween pictures of college girls that he doesn't even know? Worse, what about the well-founded concerns of pedophiles finding a new avenue to lure children into unwanted circumstances? Surely that should detract somewhat from this site's allure, right?
But I digress. Not everyone is on Facebook to stalk people and obviously millions of people believe it's a great site. And to them, I say, "great!" Just don't expect me to use it as this junker of a site quickly becomes the cesspool MySpace currently is.
MySpace Which brings me to MySpace. Is it not one of the ugliest and most disgustingly horrid sites you've even been to? Go ahead, try your luck with a search and tell me if it actually works. If so, head to the page of the person you're looking up and tell me if there's music playing automatically, you can't read a thing on the page because the design is awful and there are some weird symbols that are supposed to represent this person's name. If so, get away from it as soon as possible. Trust me, you won't regret it.
The issues I have with MySpace go far beyond its ugliness, though. Once again, privacy concerns should come to the forefront and I'm still not sold on the belief that MySpace will last forever. Personally, I think it has about one more year left in the tank before it hits rock bottom. These sites last a few years, at best. Why should MySpace (or Facebook for that matter) be any different?
Slashdot Okay, so maybe Slashdot isn't a social site in the conventional sense of the word, but it's a major competitor to Digg, so I thought I should mention it.
What makes Slashdot so great is what makes it bad. By and large, Slashdot is a destination for the uber-geek who wants to find out the latest on some of the tech topics that the average person either doesn't care about or has no idea they even existed. Sure, some stories are great and worth reading, but one of the main reason Digg has been able to overtake Slashdot is because the people get to choose which stories should be shown on the front page -- not a group of editors. If Slashdot ever decided to install a quasi-Digg promotion engine into its site, I wonder what kind of stories would hit the front page. My guess? Even geekier stuff -- as long as the Slashdot faithful didn't revolt first.
Digg So what makes Digg so great? It's simple really.
Digg is a hub for millions of people every month and yet it doesn't suffer from privacy concerns and it actually enlightens you instead of making you dumb. Instead of stalking people, you have the opportunity to become part of a community that decides on which topics are worthwhile and those that are not. Simply put, Digg is a place where the average person can find a platform they need to tell the world what really matters. How can that be bad?
Compare that to its competitors and I'm hard-pressed to find just one that offers the enrichment and overall quality Digg offers. Think about it -- it's not ugly, you don't stalk, you learn something and you actually make a difference.
There's no guarantee that any of these sites will be around in 2008 and chances are, many of these will be sold off to the highest bidder. But as long as Digg sticks around and stays true to what it is, I'll be happy -- and I think you will be too.
Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has written about everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Don is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and posts at The Digital Home. He is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.








Secondly, I agree with everything LKJK said.
Bias. That's what best describes this article. Bias. Nothing more.
First off, DIGG? Best? And wait, let me get this straight...you work for a technology company and rely on the results of Compete and Alexa for accurate stats? Psh. CNet management, I've used Digg, Facebook, Myspace, and Slashdot for some time, hire me too so I can pretend to be an expert!!
Facebook is more than strangers poking each other, so don't try to paint that picture. Facebook has an extensive profile privacy setting control panel. You just need to be the tech savvy person you claim to be and actually learn to use them. Genius. And how weak of you to pull the old "pedophiles finding a new avenue to lure children into unwanted circumstances?" It's up to parents to monitor their child's internet use. Don't make this a Facebook issue.
Myspace. I agree with you about the site's sad excuse of page design, but that's about it. While I also detest Myspace, I will say that it's the number one most trafficked website for a reason. Since you seem to care about the community being able to decide on everything on a social website, how come you didn't elaborate on the fact that Myspace is as big as it because users are allowed to choose just about every element of design that goes into their profiles, messages, and various posts/comments.
I'd continue you on with Slashdot, but admittedly I'm not a huge fanatic, probably because I'm not the aforementioned "uber-geek who wants to find out the latest on some of the tech topics that the average person either doesn't care about or has no idea they even existed."
http://www.root-1.co.il/reddit.htm
********. You get anti-semite comments everywhere, including Digg, Youtube and everyplace else... and guess what? They get buried and responded to. There are anti-American comments, anti-Bush comments, anti-everything comments - including anti-Reddit comments...
You could go to any site and pull hundreds of quotes against christians, religion, muslims, americans, mexicans, etc. But the only thing that troubles you are the comments made about Jews - pretty damn hypocritical of you.
These social sites are open to the rest of the world including massive amounts of people from the middle east and surrounding areas. Not saying this is right - just saying that this reflects the world. So the next time you see an anti-jewish comment, respond to it directly instead of whining here.
I think a social network should offer you more than the ability to float a story, throw a toaster or poke someone you'd never associate with offline.
That said, it appears that that's exactly what the masses want to do, doesn?t it?
I think sites like www.FindLikeMinds.com have the potential to offer something more personal and meaningful - things that have influenced others. At least you end up gaining something of value from the visit.
Maybe 2008 will be the year for more meaningful social applications?