• On last.fm: Check out Lil Wayne's Music for Free
December 31, 2007 6:39 AM PST

Radiohead on its In Rainbows distribution: "It's the only obvious thing to do"

Ask Thom Yorke, lead singer of Radiohead, whether the band's foray into a "pay what you want" model for music was successful and he'll tell you, as he told David Byne (Talking Heads) in this Wired interview:

In terms of digital income, we've made more money out of this record than out of all the other Radiohead albums put together, forever--in terms of anything on the Net. And that's nuts. It's partly due to the fact that EMI wasn't giving us any money for digital sales. All the contracts signed in a certain era have none of that stuff.

Sounds great, except that he's comparing "more money" to "zero money." Apparently the music companies don't pay new bands (or old?) squat for digital sales (read: iTunes) of their music. I can't fathom why. I suppose because they don't have to.

But where the interview becomes useful and interesting is when Yorke talks through the relevance of this new model for new bands. Teaser: it's not.

The only reason we could even get away with this, the only reason anyone even gives a xxxx, is the fact that we've gone through the whole mill of the business in the first place. It's not supposed to be a model for anything else. It was simply a response to a situation. We're out of contract. We have our own studio. We have this new server. What the hell else would we do? This was the obvious thing. But it only works for us because of where we are.

David] Byrne: What about bands that are just getting started?

Yorke: Well, first and foremost, you don't sign a huge record contract that strips you of all your digital rights, so that when you do sell something on iTunes you get absolutely zero. That would be the first priority. If you're an emerging artist, it must be frightening at the moment. Then again, I don't see a downside at all to big record companies not having access to new artists, because they have no idea what to do with them now anyway.

We're in uncharted territory here, just as in the software world. A model that works for one band or one software company may not work well for another. But that's OK. The general principle is to foster and milk abundance. The "how" is up for grabs.

Matt Asay is general manager of the Americas and vice president of business development at Alfresco, and has nearly a decade of operational experience with commercial open source and regularly speaks and publishes on open-source business strategy. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Recent posts from The Open Road
The BBC urged to become UK's "open-source media platform"
Microsoft boosts revenue through licensing complexity
Red Hat CEO: The secret to open-source success is "iteration"
Call for Papers for Open Source Business Conference is now live
Marc Fleury's OpenRemote gets into databases with Beehive
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 2 comments
by zlguocius December 31, 2007 10:23 AM PST
1. Collect underpants.
2. ?
3. Profit.
Reply to this comment
by ZUrlocker December 31, 2007 11:37 AM PST
***?
Nobody told me I needed underpants!

--Zack
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

About The Open Road

Matt Asay brings a decade of in-the-trenches open-source business and legal experience to the Open Road, with an emphasis on emerging open-source business strategies and opportunities. Matt is general manager of the Americas division and vice president of business development at Alfresco, a company that develops open-source software for content management. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Open Road topics

Featured blogs

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right