• On CBS.com: Sexy women of CBS
July 28, 2008 10:13 AM PDT

Column: Finally, ID fraud protection that works

Posted by Robert Vamosi
  • Font size
  • Print

Jay Foley, co-founder of the Identity Theft Resource Center, told me recently that 57 percent of all identity fraud involves opening new accounts "for short-term gain." The ITRC should know: it has been surveying ID fraud victims for several years and has amassed some impressive real-world statistics.

Foley also said 13 percent of the identity theft victims found out about the attacks only after criminals had established utility or cable service in their names. "So your credit record is more theirs than yours, making it harder to fight them in court," he said.

Clearly the best solution is to stop credit fraud at the moment it starts, when the account is first applied for, but for years credit histories and scores lay shrouded in mystery.

Fortunately, there's greater transparency with regard to credit reports these days. Since 2003, the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, or Facta, makes it possible for individuals to request one free annual credit report from each of the three major credit reporting agencies. (Go to AnnualCreditReport.com.) Initially, it was to correct any errors in the credit report; many people, however, use this process to monitor their reports for credit fraud.

While you can request all three credit reports at once, experts recommend staggering these, requesting one from a different reporting agency every 90 days or so. That way you'll see a comprehensive view. In addition to requesting your credit report, Congress, through laws such as the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), has provided other tools for monitoring your credit activity.

A fraud alert placed on your credit history requires an issuing entity to contact you first before opening a new account. Fraud alerts need to be renewed every 90 days unless you are a documented victim of identity fraud, in which case you are entitled to additional protection for up to seven years.

Another option is to place a credit freeze on your credit history. As of November 1, 2007, all three major credit reporting agencies offer this option. Lenders looking to issue credit in the name of someone with a credit freeze will be unable to access the credit history without your explicit permission. In most states there is no termination date, however there is a $10 fee to institute a freeze, and a $12 fee to lift it whenever you want to allow a credit check. These fees are waived if there is proof the individual is an identity fraud victim. The main advantage of a credit freeze over a fraud alert is that the credit freeze does not expire. Credit freezes, however, do not apply to entities with whom the consumer has an existing account. Nor do they apply to law enforcement agencies and certain governmental agencies.

The plans from Experian, Trans Union, and Equifax are similar, each providing a complementary credit report from all three reporting agencies, continuous monitoring of credit activity and any online use of your personal information, and some insurance against identity fraud abuse. The plans range from $11 to $14 per month, with annual and family plans available for less. They do not, however, place alerts or a freeze on your credit history.

This creates a market for private identity protection companies. One of the first was TrustedID, which costs $10 per month per adult (with annual and family plans available) and places both a fraud alert and a credit freeze on your credit history (requiring you to be contacted in both cases), opts you out of credit offers, $1 million in loss insurance, scans for personal data on the Internet, and monitors change of address. TrustedID also scans for medical fraud and protects against spyware.

Providing similar protection is LifeLock. This company is perhaps the best known because its CEO advertises his personal Social Security number as an example of how secure the company is. Bruce Schneier recently did an analysis of what's right and what's wrong with LifeLock as did the CNET Blogger Network's Chris Soghoian.

The Achilles' heel in all of these plans is that the financial institution does not have to make a reasonable attempt to contact you, so the fraudulent account may still get opened. Even with a credit freeze, some financial intuitions won't contact you. There's no way to prove or disprove an institution called you, said ITRC's Foley.

Until now.

Back in 2004 a guy named Bo Holland took a gamble. He bet that that identity fraud would only get worse, not better. And he was right. Having built a series of start-ups within the financial services industry, Holland had an insider's perspective on the problem; he knew how banks and other institutions handled credit requests; he also had worked at Critix Systems, so he had understanding about application delivery. With his latest start-up, Debix, an identity protection network, Holland pulled together all of his skills.

Not only does Debix put a credit freeze on your profile, but it uses its own phone number to log whether the credit institution tried to contact you. And if you're not available, Debix puts the pending account or loan on hold until you are able to return the call. And by using a Debix phone number, not your home number, on your credit report, that adds another layer of security to the product.

So how does Debix work in the real world? Say you are at a car dealership and you need to finance a new car. Shortly after the salesperson leaves the showroom floor, your mobile phone should ring. That's Debix; you know it because it's your voice saying a secret code. Then Debix asks if you indeed are seeking to establish a new account. If yes, you type in a secret personal identification number.

Say you are on vacation and Debix conveys a permission request for a new account. Since you didn't request a new account, you press star and you are instantly put in touch with a Debix investigator, who then contacts the party requesting the credit check. The advantage here, says Holland, is that the ID fraud case is still hot. In some cases, Debix has been able to identify a particular IP address and then turn that information over the local law enforcement. This saves local law enforcement time; they don't have to get a warrant for the bank's information--Debix has already provided the information.

Jerry Dixon, former director of the National Cyber Security Division of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, told me that there are many reasons why ID fraud cases aren't investigated.

"An assistant U.S. attorney might ask 'What's the likelihood of this going overseas?' 'What is the likelihood of being able to nail down who this is without having to write 20 subpoenas first?'"

If the IP address goes out to Belarus, then Dixon says forget it; the U.S. no longer has a law enforcement attache in Belarus so it's hard to enlist sympathy from law enforcement in that country. But if a company like Debix can provide law enforcement with details from the financial institution and a party willing to press charges, your odds of getting someone arrested improve.

Sound too good to be true? In a study published by Julie Fergerson, vice president of Emerging Technologies, and Debix's Holland, the authors looked at 30,000 Debix-secured transactions during a two-month period at the end of 2007. Of those, 380 were identified as fraud and were stopped immediately. Overall, the rate of new account fraud among Debix customers was zero percent.

ITRC's Foley said he was impressed with the results within the survey. Holland told me that during the survey period there were four instances of new account fraud. In each case, however, the financial institution did not call the customer. With Debix, though, you have some recourse. Debix maintains a record and can prove the institution in question did not attempt to call the customer.

Since learning about Debix in June, I've been trying to knock the protection, but so far cannot. Holland, it turns out, is no stranger to the computer security community; since 2004 he's been showing his wares and soliciting opinions at Defcon in Las Vegas. He invited Phil Zimmerman, creator of Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) to fault it, and he could not. Holland has invited other computer hackers to pick apart his logic. Even Foley and Dixon are full of praise for Debix.

And it gets better.

As of Monday, Debix is lowering its prices "way down" says Holland. One adult can sign up for $24 a year; families with up to three adults and four children can sign up for $72; and families with up to five adults and four children can sign up for $144 a year. That's much less than similar plans being offered by Experian, Trans Union, Equifax, TrustedID, and LifeLock. And Debix has been protecting people since 2004, so it's not some untested entity.

If you can name a more secure ID protection service for less cost, I'd like to hear from you.

Recent posts from Defense in Depth
How to handle ID fraud's youngest victims
Is white listing going mainstream?
How Live OneCare changed the antivirus landscape
Express Scripts clients threatened with extortion
Study: DDoS attacks threaten ISP infrastructure
Security expert talks Russian gangs, botnets
Extortion used in Express Scripts database breach
WPA wireless encryption cracked
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 21 comments
by alenas July 28, 2008 10:52 AM PDT
Stupid US banks and credit agencies - they should be responsible for ID Theft.
In Europe if you want to have a loan - you have to come in person with a photo ID.
In Europe I can post my bank accounts and SSN numbers without any fear - because noone can use that information to achieve anything.
US is just so laizy - so they make all the infrastructure for ID Thefts.
So people who are making this possible should be responsible.
Reply to this comment
by C++ Genius July 28, 2008 2:10 PM PDT
In South Africa (of all places) you need to supply a photo ID and proof of physical residence before opening an account. It is really a pain in the neck to supply all the paperwork, but it is well worth the security and it is a lot cheaper than $24 a year. Banks and credit agencies are not really lazy, they take shortcuts because it is much easier to close a deal with a customer if you have very little paperwork. Their profits are much more important to them than the security of their clients.
by b_baggins July 29, 2008 7:56 AM PDT
Please. Spare us the Europe is utopia mantra. We're getting tired of it. If I have your identity, its trivial for me to make a photo ID with my picture and your information.
by Remo_Williams July 28, 2008 11:28 AM PDT
Ah, now here's a value-add opportunity for a credit card company: offer a free membership with the card, for every cardholder.

-R
Reply to this comment
by CNETFAN59 July 28, 2008 1:43 PM PDT
You say that the Big Three doesn't offer file freezes to customers. Not true at least for one. I know that Equifax offers the ability to lock and unlock your credit any time you want for 2 bucks a month, without all the hoops of the traditional file freeze. Gives credit monitoring from Equifax a leg up.
Reply to this comment
by howiem July 28, 2008 2:51 PM PDT
If yopu are not in the United States (or a possession), forget about trying to log into annualcreditreport.com all you will get is :
The AnnualCreditReport.com website is only accessible through ISPs (Internet Service Providers) located within the United States and its territories.

This organization also refuses to change their policy thus forcing U.S. citizens overseas to use snail mail.
Reply to this comment
by godivarides July 28, 2008 4:45 PM PDT
Ok, so who is governing the Non-Credit Granting Institutions ie Companies using Third Party Agencies demanding your credit report as required criteria for employment consideration? Especially when the policy explicitly, excludes current employees?
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis July 29, 2008 12:12 PM PDT
Well, companies shouldn't really be allowed to ask for credit reports as part of giving you a job. It should be FORBIDDEN, and I don't understand why a law hasn't been passed forbidding this practice, even though I have nothing to hide on my credit report.
by DrKevorkian July 28, 2008 4:52 PM PDT
What's with the stupid "leet" speak in the column title. It is annoying enough when an 11 year old uses it, here it's just plain sophomoric.
Reply to this comment
by DrKevorkian July 28, 2008 4:57 PM PDT
I do "get" the "haxor" inference, it's still stupid.
by DigitalFrog July 29, 2008 7:32 AM PDT
In this case, it isn't 'leet speak' but a common way of rendering a password or passphrase more secure. This is a blog on security after all.
by Lerianis July 29, 2008 12:11 PM PDT
Here is what the government should do: allow anyone to put a credit freeze on their account for NO money whatsoever. Just pass a law saying that the companies in question (Equifax, Transunion, etc.) have to allow people to freeze their credit at ANY time, for no charge.

There is really absolutely NO paperwork to fill out for this procedure. They just type into a computer that a person wants a credit freeze...... ZAP! It's frozen!
Reply to this comment
by Harrison912 July 29, 2008 7:27 PM PDT
I like this plan and as a web site owner with a site dedicated to safety and security products, I'd love to be able to offer this to my customers when they come to my site to shop.

I'm wondering if there is a way to do that?
Reply to this comment
by James Anderson Merritt July 30, 2008 3:30 PM PDT
There is an over-emphasis on "identity." In most cases where personal identification is needed, the nature of the transaction itself does not require the establishment of someone's identity; rather, party A needs (often under compulsion of law) to verify some fact about party B (e.g., age, residence address, etc.), which is recorded on the ID document. When making payments by credit card in person, ID is demanded by the seller in order to verify that the person using the card is entitled to use it. But when making payments by debit card at cash-register card-readers, you put in your own PIN number; the merchant has no need to know your identity.

We could develop a system where identity was not so easily stolen, nor stolen identities much in demand, if we concentrated on not requiring ID in any case where actual identification weren't strictly necessary. We probably won't, however, because those who wish to centralize power in governments and corporations -- and they are a powerful lobby -- find it convenient to be able to keep files about people, and trace their transactions. Instead, people will be taught to fear the spectre of identity theft, and will actually demand and cheer the development of "identity theft protection." Once again, the public will be diverted from a path toward a real cure for a larger problem, of which the much-promoted "crisis" is only a symptom.
Reply to this comment
by 350AZ July 30, 2008 9:47 PM PDT
Privacy group says identity-theft monitoring services may be a waste of money

Many are overpriced and offer protections that can be had for free, PRC claims

By Jaikumar Vijayan

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyId=17&articleId=9111019&intsrc=hm_topic

July 29, 2008 (Computerworld) Consumers who sign up for identity-theft monitoring services may be getting a lot less protection against some common types of fraud than they assume they are, according to an online guide released yesterday by the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse (PRC).

What's more, many of the services offered by identity-theft monitoring vendors can often be obtained for free, the San Diego-based privacy advocacy group claimed.

The PRC's guide doesn't mention any vendors by name and notes that the available monitoring services "vary tremendously" in what they offer. Even so, many of them are overpriced and don't provide anything close to full protection against identity theft or credit fraud, said Paul Stephens, the PRC's director of policy and advocacy and the author of the guide, which offers tips on selecting monitoring services.

"There is no correlation between the price you pay and the services you get," Stephens said.
Reply to this comment
by gnoter August 1, 2008 3:03 PM PDT
I tried to reset my password on debix, and got into their backend system and started viewing code components. The short of it: I broke their system, albiet unintentionally.

[CNET editors' note: Inappropriate material deleted.]
Reply to this comment
by Jordan Skylar August 3, 2008 4:18 AM PDT
The article has some good information, but it is poorly written. Mr. Vamosi jumps from one idea to another without indicating it. He talks about credit freezes and then jumps to plans from Experian, Trans Union, and Equifax. If I didn't know about the different freezes and plans, I would have been somewhat lost. Mr. Vamosi's grammar and spelling could use improvement. At one point, he refers to the company, Critix Systems. Citrix is the correct spelling. I'm sure the company is thrilled.
Reply to this comment
by farrell.brandon August 6, 2008 2:30 PM PDT
If gnoter managed to break debix without even trying, what does that say about QA, especially when the main thing debix supposedly does is put another layer of security over the standard credit freeze and fraud alerts? If debix's secret password calling system fails, what then? Is everything completely frozen until you can get the interns in tech support to quit picking their noses? Furthermore, Mr. Vamosi's article sounds like a Billy Mays infomercial for debix, and seems to spout its praise like it's some kind of excuse for one not to be careful about letting credit history fly about, like mr. lifelock did when someone managed to take out a loan on the SSN he put on all the billboards. Great publicity, that.

CNET's having enough trouble with its credibility after Gamespot's went down the tubes, so I think readers deserve something better than a paraphrasing of debix's press releases.
Reply to this comment
by Piercan August 23, 2008 11:49 AM PDT
I agree with alenas, though I wouldn't advise anyone to advertize their social security number :)
Reply to this comment
by mwiitala November 19, 2008 6:18 AM PST
Quote "Privacy group says identity-theft monitoring services may be a waste of money

Many are overpriced and offer protections that can be had for free, PRC claims"

By Jaikumar Vijayan

Correct, some of the services can be done for free but when you can get it done for $24 and it includes insurance I would much rather pay as I do for many other things. The author also seems to be comparing monitoring systems not fraud alert systems. The Debix system is actually able to prove how their system works, check out their website for details www.debix.com.

Here is a good site that compares the three identity protection companies mentioned - LifeLock, Debix, and TrustedID.

http://www.identitytheftlabs.com
Reply to this comment
by ziggyff December 3, 2008 9:05 AM PST
I'm sure that they have an opportunity to reduce numbers of such crimes. There are a lot of different methods and tools to prevent such crimes. For example <a href="http://fraud-protection.netsoftwaredevelopment.com">this</a> or <a href="http://www.cdyne.com/products/phone-verification.asp">this</a>one
Reply to this comment
 See all 21 Comments >>
advertisement
Click Here

In the news now

Slowing expectations at a green-tech start-up

Six months ago, biofuels start-up Mascoma had the wind in its sails, as did the rest of the clean-tech sector. Now, the company is treading carefully and scaling back.


With JavaFX, Sun seeks new coders, new revenue

With the launch of JavaFX 1.0, Sun is trying to reclaim Java's strength as a foundation for rich Internet applications. But it's no longer the incumbent.


Tim Lincecum, motion capture star

San Francisco Giants pitcher, who won the Cy Young award last month, dons a motion capture suit for 2K Sports' Major League Baseball 2K9 video game.


About Defense in Depth

Covering computer viruses and computer crime, Robert Vamosi goes beyond the hype to provide you with expert interviews of the top security researchers, as well as offering the hands-on, nontechnical advice you'll need to stay safe online.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Defense in Depth topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right